Posted 06 February 2013 - 05:01 PM
Im struggling to get my head round it
I suppose the screaming in my face on Sunday by a fan of yours saying " are you effing Warrington or what" should have cleared it up
You dont like it
Ill leave you to it lads
All the best for the coming season. You were awesome on Sunday and the best team definitely won
Stack as always was immense
Posted 06 February 2013 - 05:43 PM
Posted 06 February 2013 - 06:14 PM
Regardless of any perceived benefit from having 9 Warrinton players in a side in the Championship you will find all of my posts against it, even if Town had Hock, Brown and John Clarke in their team.
I dread to think how that benefit to Swinton is going to pan out to the next game if there was only 601 at the game, with 150 from Town. Wood is having problems of his own and is (allegedly) talking to Wigan (I can't think why), so that benefit may quickly disappear.
Posted 06 February 2013 - 06:33 PM
I suggest you read my post again,introduce the age limit on DR players again,limit the amount you can register rather than the amount you can play and you fix a lot of what is wrong with the current system
So what youre saying is if the rules fit your interpretation of them its ok
Its not ok to have a player for a match here or ok to sign very young lads to enable them to develop for a sesson
It is however ok to sign direct from super league sessoned pros for a full season? And Dewsbury having a link with Bradford on this occasion is irrelevant
There are some strange morals in this debate
I struggle to see why you all give a ###### so much..
Edited by haven4ever, 06 February 2013 - 06:34 PM.
Posted 06 February 2013 - 09:05 PM
Posted 07 February 2013 - 07:27 PM
I'd take a punt on Karl Pryce in this league any day . Location as ever helps these teams .
He didn't fully deliver a junior or when first in SL or in RU or back in SL