08/02/13 - Hull FC v Bradford Bulls - KO 8pm
Started by
John Drake
, Feb 07 2013 08:48 AM
Club news release
141 replies to this topic
#121
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:27 PM
Should have put 22-6, even though it was off touch. Some kicker is Foster.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#122
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:30 PM
Pitts over, 28-6.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#123
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:34 PM
Horne making a big difference since he came on.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#124
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:44 PM
Briscoe with the tackle of the season.
Bulls score two tackles later.
28-12.
Bulls score two tackles later.
28-12.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#125
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:44 PM
10,952.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#126
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:47 PM
*sigh* Nevermind. As long as we learn for next week then I'll be ok.
#127
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:50 PM
Relying on BCB commentary, so I've no idea how the game went; McDonnell offside, Hull FC head high, Bulls lethargic.
#128
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:18 PM
Sounds like a Blunderside summing up.Relying on BCB commentary, so I've no idea how the game went; McDonnell offside, Hull FC head high, Bulls lethargic.
Bulls found it difficult to break down Hull's defence, Hull played with more direction at last. Horne and Heremiah both terrific. Seymour has a tough job getting picked again for me.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#129
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:23 PM
Sounded like we had a terribly slow start, managed to claw something back to 16-12 in the second half** but nevermind, anxiious for next week though with Castleford winning though.Sounds like a Blunderside summing up.
Bulls found it difficult to break down Hull's defence, Hull played with more direction at last. Horne and Heremiah both terrific. Seymour has a tough job getting picked again for me.
**edit: 16-12 was the equivalent second half scoreline... before anyone picks up on that
Edited by hindle xiii, 10 February 2013 - 05:28 PM.
#130
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:28 PM
Bulls attack clueless. Had so much possession and territory and barely managed to get over our line. Hull cut up their defence at ease at times. Good job we didn't have much ball!
Huge turnaround from last week.
Huge turnaround from last week.
#131
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:48 PM
Good performance from hull, my judgment on arundel was right poor player gets dropped crooks looked a far better more creative option for his winger crookes who I thought was mom
#132
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:50 PM
Makes no sense whatsoever apart from you don't like ArundelGood performance from hull, my judgment on arundel was right poor player gets dropped crooks looked a far better more creative option for his winger crookes who I thought was mom
#133
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:52 PM
From what I heard in commentary, I'd argue dropping Seymour for Horne was a bigger turning point.
#134
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:55 PM
Correct.From what I heard in commentary, I'd argue dropping Seymour for Horne was a bigger turning point.
Oh, by the way, the score was never 16-12.
(Runs for cover...)
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#135
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:58 PM
Kicking a man while he's down, nice.Correct.
Oh, by the way, the score was never 16-12.
(Runs for cover...)
Ner ner!
#136
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:06 PM
What it says is I know what I'm talking about and obviously PG sees it how I see it, arundel out crooks in hull win makes sense to me !!!Makes no sense whatsoever apart from you don't like Arundel
#137
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:30 PM
Maybe, but you can interpret your posts easily.What it says is I know what I'm talking about and obviously PG sees it how I see it, arundel out crooks in hull win makes sense to me !!!
We, mere English speaking mortals, have some difficulty.
On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#138
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:35 PM
I dont have a good memory to lie, so it's easier to say it how it is!!!
#139
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:24 AM
Hull deserved their win, their defence was top drawer throughout and they took their chances.
I think the Bulls' chance went when Platt went off injured fairly early on when putting Crookes into touch, and Kearney was put back to fullback with Danny Addy (a forward) put in at half. We are very thin at half with little cover to start with in the halves, and this move (I guess) is largely why we ignored, at least three, overlap situations, and opted for yet another inside pass for the Hull defence to gobble up...We missed far too many one on one tackles too and weren't anywhere near good enough on the day.
Still, 28 - 12 isn't too bad at the KC - onwards and upwards!
I think the Bulls' chance went when Platt went off injured fairly early on when putting Crookes into touch, and Kearney was put back to fullback with Danny Addy (a forward) put in at half. We are very thin at half with little cover to start with in the halves, and this move (I guess) is largely why we ignored, at least three, overlap situations, and opted for yet another inside pass for the Hull defence to gobble up...We missed far too many one on one tackles too and weren't anywhere near good enough on the day.
Still, 28 - 12 isn't too bad at the KC - onwards and upwards!
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Club news release
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













