Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Super league clubs reserves/U23's

dual reg/twinnig

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 shun

shun
  • Coach
  • 1,503 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:10 PM

Shouldn't super league clubs be aloud to enter there reserves/U23's into the championships? like they do in Spanish soccer.

That would put an end to the current dual reg s**te.

It would give sl clubs the ability to get the players match fit for sl, and it would up the standard of the championships also,

Surely this is a better option than the current one.

Is this possible?

#2 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,464 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:13 PM

Shouldn't super league clubs be aloud to enter there reserves/U23's into the championships? like they do in Spanish soccer.

That would put an end to the current dual reg s**te.

It would give sl clubs the ability to get the players match fit for sl, and it would up the standard of the championships also,

Surely this is a better option than the current one.

Is this possible?


No they shouldn't and, anyway, that's not what they want. They don't want to run a 17 man reserve team, they want seven or eight reserves who can play somewhere else when they're not wanted.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#3 shun

shun
  • Coach
  • 1,503 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:20 PM

No they shouldn't and, anyway, that's not what they want. They don't want to run a 17 man reserve team, they want seven or eight reserves who can play somewhere else when they're not wanted.

dont you think that that is a sad state of affairs when this has to happen? do sl clubs run reserve/U23 teams any more? they did last year didnt they? apologies for being sad on the other thread by the way, i didnt mean to come across that way. :D :lol:

#4 RSN

RSN
  • Coach
  • 3,870 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:32 PM

More cost efficient for SL clubs the current way. That's all that matters at the end of the day.

#5 Pottsy

Pottsy
  • Coach
  • 3,496 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:00 PM

I've often thought it would be beneficial to allow Super League clubs to run Championship feeder clubs in development areas.

#6 kioli

kioli
  • Coach
  • 336 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:05 PM

It'd cost more for SL clubs to do this and it'd kill off the clubs who play in the Champ/Champ1 as there'd be fewer players for them to recruit and less places in the comp.

#7 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,464 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 12:41 PM

dont you think that that is a sad state of affairs when this has to happen?


Yes. Definitely.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#8 South Wakefield Sharks

South Wakefield Sharks
  • Coach
  • 2,136 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:17 PM

So clearly all the RFL's fault - not!!

http://www.therfl.co...ation-timelines




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users