Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Super league clubs reserves/U23's

dual reg/twinnig

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 shun

shun
  • Coach
  • 1,522 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:10 PM

Shouldn't super league clubs be aloud to enter there reserves/U23's into the championships? like they do in Spanish soccer.

That would put an end to the current dual reg s**te.

It would give sl clubs the ability to get the players match fit for sl, and it would up the standard of the championships also,

Surely this is a better option than the current one.

Is this possible?

#2 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,755 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:13 PM

Shouldn't super league clubs be aloud to enter there reserves/U23's into the championships? like they do in Spanish soccer.

That would put an end to the current dual reg s**te.

It would give sl clubs the ability to get the players match fit for sl, and it would up the standard of the championships also,

Surely this is a better option than the current one.

Is this possible?


No they shouldn't and, anyway, that's not what they want. They don't want to run a 17 man reserve team, they want seven or eight reserves who can play somewhere else when they're not wanted.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#3 shun

shun
  • Coach
  • 1,522 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:20 PM

No they shouldn't and, anyway, that's not what they want. They don't want to run a 17 man reserve team, they want seven or eight reserves who can play somewhere else when they're not wanted.

dont you think that that is a sad state of affairs when this has to happen? do sl clubs run reserve/U23 teams any more? they did last year didnt they? apologies for being sad on the other thread by the way, i didnt mean to come across that way. :D :lol:

#4 RSN

RSN
  • Coach
  • 4,046 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:32 PM

More cost efficient for SL clubs the current way. That's all that matters at the end of the day.

#5 Pottsy

Pottsy
  • Coach
  • 3,533 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:00 PM

I've often thought it would be beneficial to allow Super League clubs to run Championship feeder clubs in development areas.

#6 kioli

kioli
  • Coach
  • 336 posts

Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:05 PM

It'd cost more for SL clubs to do this and it'd kill off the clubs who play in the Champ/Champ1 as there'd be fewer players for them to recruit and less places in the comp.

#7 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,755 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 12:41 PM

dont you think that that is a sad state of affairs when this has to happen?


Yes. Definitely.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#8 South Wakefield Sharks

South Wakefield Sharks
  • Coach
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:17 PM

So clearly all the RFL's fault - not!!

http://www.therfl.co...ation-timelines




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users