15/02/13 - St Helens v Hull FC - KO 8pm
#1
Posted 13 February 2013 - 11:50 AM
John Drake
Site Admin: TotalRL.com
TotalRL.com
Email: john.drake@totalrl.com
#2
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:00 PM
I'll be positive and go for a narrow Saints win, though I won't be at all surprised if we come up short.
#3
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:16 PM
#4
Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:09 PM
#5
Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:12 PM
#6
Posted 13 February 2013 - 07:26 PM
St Helens squad: Paul Wellens, Ade Gardner, Jordan Turner, Sia Soliola, Francis Meli, Jonny Lomax, James Roby, Louie McCarthy-Scarsbrook, Tony Puletua, Jon Wilkin, Willie Manu, Anthony Laffranchi, Mark Flanagan, Josh Jones, Lee Gaskell, Tommy Makinson, Joe Greenwood, Alex Walmsley, Anthony Walker.
No James Child?
#7
Posted 13 February 2013 - 08:39 PM
No James Child?
He he....
Saints need to find another gear or they're in for a kicking.....Is this walmsley's first game?....
#8
Posted 13 February 2013 - 08:45 PM
Huddersfield and Wigan's turn this week. Shame he wasn't doing the Sunday game at the John Smith's Stadium...No James Child?
#9
Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:02 PM
2010 Warrington 30 Leeds 6
2011 League Leaders Shield Winners
2012 Warrington 35 Leeds 18
Challenge cups and league leaders shields everywhere! We need more silver polish!
#10
Posted 14 February 2013 - 07:39 AM
Don't think I'll be making it down the East Lancs Highway for this one so that's another reason for thinking we might sneak a win.
Saints 18 Hull FC 22.
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#11
Posted 14 February 2013 - 03:04 PM
#12
Posted 15 February 2013 - 02:10 AM
#13
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:47 PM
I wish Saints would move Wellens to loose, Lomax to full back, Gaskell in at 6 release Lance Hohaia and sign a proper scrum half. I think they'll be a much more of attacking threat with that set up. Game could go either way. Hope Walmsley does well in his first game.
I agree they'd probably be much a better attacking threat structured that way, but I'm not too disappointed that they're not.
#14
Posted 15 February 2013 - 09:54 PM
#15
Posted 15 February 2013 - 10:17 PM
Predictions for the future -
Crusaders RL to get a franchise for 2012 onwards -WRONG
Widnes Vikings also to get a franchise - RIGHT
Crusaders RL to do the double over Widnes and finish five places ahead of them -WRONG
Widnes Vikings NOT to dominate rugby league in years to come! STILL TO COME
http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/cardiffdemonsrlfc/
http://www.walesrugbyleague.co.uk/
I promise to pay �10 to the charity of Bomb Jacks choice if Widnes Millionaires finish above the battling underdogs Crusaders RL. I OWE A TENNER!
http://www.jaxaxe.co...89/Default.aspx
#16
Posted 15 February 2013 - 10:23 PM
#17
Posted 15 February 2013 - 10:35 PM
Given that we were leading for most of that match I'd say Hull won a point and we lost one! Good game in the first half but progressively worse in the second, and I rather think that whatever Brown is doing with us, it is killing us in the last 10 minutes. We are not fit enough and I want to know why Brown thinks that Saints are Canterbury Bulldogs?? We don't have the talent to pass at the line. Only two forwards actually ran forward and did so to make yards; the rest ran like crabs.good game, good game???
#18
Posted 15 February 2013 - 10:39 PM
#19
Posted 15 February 2013 - 11:57 PM
If only Saints hadn't got that lucky try.Saints 18 Hull FC 22.
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#20
Posted 16 February 2013 - 06:48 AM
Given that we were leading for most of that match I'd say Hull won a point and we lost one! Good game in the first half but progressively worse in the second, and I rather think that whatever Brown is doing with us, it is killing us in the last 10 minutes. We are not fit enough and I want to know why Brown thinks that Saints are Canterbury Bulldogs?? We don't have the talent to pass at the line. Only two forwards actually ran forward and did so to make yards; the rest ran like crabs.
We did make some very basic errors, including not playing the ball correctly on two occasions. Not too sure why Wellans threw the ball away when the ball was deemed to have hit his foot! Overall, I though Hull were the better side.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













