Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 401 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, full colour, in-depth coverage from the grassroots through to the international game.
Click here for the digital edition or just download the Rugby League World app from Apple Newsstand or Google Play now.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 401
/ View a Gallery of all our previous 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 401
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Chris Bridge


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 duffymoon

duffymoon
  • Coach
  • 2,573 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:42 PM

According to Warrington Guardian will be playing for Swinton on Sunday.

#2 jt

jt
  • Coach
  • 1,667 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:06 PM

That's why the DR system is causing unrest in the championship Give the younger lads a chance of game time but C Bridges is not a championship player at this present time

#3 guess who

guess who
  • Coach
  • 3,952 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:18 PM

What a complete and utter farce DR has turned out to be.

#4 duffymoon

duffymoon
  • Coach
  • 2,573 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:30 PM

I am a Swinton fan and disgusted at how the club is using the DR arrangement.Worth noting that Morley,Briers and Moaghan are all currently out injured for Wire so no doubt will feature for Swinton as part of their rehabilitation.

#5 Ant

Ant
  • Coach
  • 3,058 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:38 PM

To play devils advocate - wouldn't Morley or Briers add people to the gate just to see them play?


#6 jpmc

jpmc
  • Coach
  • 485 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:41 PM

If people want to watch these players, shouldn't they go watching warrington?

#7 a.n Other

a.n Other
  • Coach
  • 1,548 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:56 PM

To play devils advocate - wouldn't Morley or Briers add people to the gate just to see them play?

It might do if Swinton only charged £5 in or less. Whst is the admission fee at LSV for a Swinton game?

#8 duffymoon

duffymoon
  • Coach
  • 2,573 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:02 PM

£15

#9 1976PMJwires

1976PMJwires
  • Coach
  • 9,453 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:07 PM

Morley will be playing for Swinton when he returns, its totally and utterly wrong, the rfl had really ######ed up!!!

#10 RSN

RSN
  • Coach
  • 3,937 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:10 PM

If people want to watch these players, shouldn't they go watching warrington?


In the RFL's world that is exactly what they want you to do.

#11 shun

shun
  • Coach
  • 1,511 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:12 PM

£15

£15????? thats £4 less than the cheapest warrington ticket

#12 hindle xiii

hindle xiii
  • Coach
  • 21,023 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:26 PM

Another DR thread?

2826856.jpg?type=articleLandscape

 

On Odsal Top baht 'at.


#13 jpmc

jpmc
  • Coach
  • 485 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:38 PM

In the RFL's world that is exactly what they want you to do.


Im not sure thats really the case, simply because there isn't enough of us to make a difference to sl club finances should we all choose to go watch them.

I think the thinking is,championship fans should help to pay for the development of sl juniors and the rehabilitation of of established sl players.

#14 Wolford6

Wolford6
  • Coach
  • 9,724 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:50 PM

£15


How much to get out? ;)

Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police


#15 shaun mc

shaun mc
  • Coach
  • 1,605 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:59 PM

Dual Reg players should be :

A. Under 24 on 01/01/2013
B. No more than 6 dual reg players to be registered at the CC club at any 1 time and a max of 4 can be in the starting 17
C. Those 6 players above to be registered for a full 2 months at a time, without recall by the SL club. Then the 6 DR players are reviewed/revised every 2 months. Can be the same or different players up to the max of 6
D. The DR players can play against the SL club in the Challenge Cup from when they are registered. The SL club cannot have first say as to which team the DR player plays for, except where the player has already played for a SL club (unlikely)
E. The DR player can only play for 1 club in the Challenge Cup from the time the CC clubs first play until the final. So if Player A is DR'd on 01/03/2013 for Dewsbury, then Dewsbury play Bradford in the Cup and Bradford ave injuries then the DR takes precedent.
Points C, D & E may make the SL clubs think a little more as to who they register as DR
F. Any SL player who has appeared in Super League in 2011 or previous to that cannot be a DR player
G. Any SL player who has been in the starting 17 more than 25 times cannot be a DR player. Thats nearly a full season of games so they are not a developing player.
F and G. stop the registering of such as Chris Bridge undermining the system

#16 morty

morty
  • Coach
  • 2,154 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:09 PM

some teams are playing by the spirit of the rules whilst others are taking full advantage of the farce that the powers that be have set up.

Lee Morton

 

Raiders have risen from the ashes


#17 RSN

RSN
  • Coach
  • 3,937 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:10 PM

Spot on exactly how it should be.

#18 guess who

guess who
  • Coach
  • 3,952 posts

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:05 AM

Another DR thread?


Your point?

#19 Oracle

Oracle
  • Coach
  • 467 posts

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:25 AM

Suprised Bridge hasnt gone elsewhere since he is being frozen out of the wolves squad

"is a dream a lie if it don't come true or is it something worse?"


#20 hindle xiii

hindle xiii
  • Coach
  • 21,023 posts

Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:47 AM

Your point?

That there is already a DR thread...

2826856.jpg?type=articleLandscape

 

On Odsal Top baht 'at.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users