Swinton 18 Dewsbury 23 - discuss the game here
#21
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:35 AM
Always a nice set of fans and a good atmosphere
#22
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:35 AM
Mirfield Rams
#23
Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:05 PM
#24
Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:23 PM
#25
Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:43 PM
Heard Hepworth broke his hand yesterday so will be out for a few weeks. Will miss him, he was playing well
which will now give russ spiers, dario esposito or josh tonks a chance to stake a claim. Good strength in depth although hepworth as been a stand out sofar.
#26
Posted 05 March 2013 - 08:47 AM
.Hale hasn't impressed me so far, especially if what I hear about his cost is correct.
BSJ what have you heard about his cost? Hope it was correct at £2k per week and a fully expensed car.
Maybe it is from the same supporter who told me that the terracing will never be built and that the existing
path would have to be taken up because his mate had told him it had been 'built on a drain'.
Where do these people get their information from?
On a more sensible note, the whole guaranteed playing payroll can't be much more than £2k per week.
the
#27
Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:19 AM
.
BSJ what have you heard about his cost? Hope it was correct at £2k per week and a fully expensed car.
Maybe it is from the same supporter who told me that the terracing will never be built and that the existing
path would have to be taken up because his mate had told him it had been 'built on a drain'.
Where do these people get their information from?
On a more sensible note, the whole guaranteed playing payroll can't be much more than £2k per week.
the
If that's what you meant to type WR then yes, that's about what I heard. Expensive for an unproven centre in my book.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#28
Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:23 AM
#29
Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:25 PM
The new pathway has been built on a drain.Or there should have a drain.If that's what you meant to type WR then yes, that's about what I heard. Expensive for an unproven centre in my book.
Dont know about the other stuffbut it has been built on a drain.If that's what you meant to type WR then yes, that's about what I heard. Expensive for an unproven centre in my book.
#30
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:22 PM
who are 'in the know' on this forum by getting them to multiply this by 52 and working out that £104k is more than
the whole squad costs for a year. Mark Sawyer has also stated in the press and at the Fans Forum that our maximum
guaranteed payment per annum per player is fixed at only four times this amount. The fully expensed car was meant to
imply that he gets a lift with the other players who travel from the West Lancashire area!
Equaliser - Who is your source of information on the building issues? I presume that you are aware that all the drainage
issues were sorted long before the path was built and the planning permission was granted for the rest of the project. With
the strict requirements of Building Control, there would be no chance of being granted a certificate to allow a maximum 1800 spectators
to stand on the terracing and use the path if there were any remaining issues.
#31
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:51 PM
The path should have been built little bit further back.You will see next time it throws it down a large puddle will collect on the field behind that end.Dont have to name a sorce thats how it is.BSJ - I thought that you were a master of irony and sarcasm. £2k per week was meant to challenge all the people
who are 'in the know' on this forum by getting them to multiply this by 52 and working out that £104k is more than
the whole squad costs for a year. Mark Sawyer has also stated in the press and at the Fans Forum that our maximum
guaranteed payment per annum per player is fixed at only four times this amount. The fully expensed car was meant to
imply that he gets a lift with the other players who travel from the West Lancashire area!
Equaliser - Who is your source of information on the building issues? I presume that you are aware that all the drainage
issues were sorted long before the path was built and the planning permission was granted for the rest of the project. With
the strict requirements of Building Control, there would be no chance of being granted a certificate to allow a maximum 1800 spectators
to stand on the terracing and use the path if there were any remaining issues.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













