Two tier SL on the way
Started by
Terry Mullaney
, Mar 11 2013 08:39 PM
727 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:39 PM
Warrington CEO, Andy Gatecliffe, believes there is a way of pleasing clubs both at the top and bottom of SL. A move to a two tier SL - one with an increased cap of £2m and another with a £1.2m spending limit, with promotion and relegation between the two. He believes such a system is definitely on the agenda from 2015 onwards.
"I would like that and think it could work as long as you make it so promotion is achievable so its not such a massive step up"
That would certainly breathe some life into the sport and add a great deal of excitement.
Above comments from Gatecliffe taken from today's League Weekly.
"I would like that and think it could work as long as you make it so promotion is achievable so its not such a massive step up"
That would certainly breathe some life into the sport and add a great deal of excitement.
Above comments from Gatecliffe taken from today's League Weekly.
Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request
http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/
Free Showreel DVD On Request
http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/
#2
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:44 PM
Warrington CEO, Andy Gatecliffe, believes there is a way of pleasing clubs both at the top and bottom of SL. A move to a two tier SL - one with an increased cap of £2m and another with a £1.2m spending limit, with promotion and relegation between the two. He believes such a system is definitely on the agenda from 2015 onwards.
"I would like that and think it could work as long as you make it so promotion is achievable so its not such a massive step up"
That would certainly breathe some life into the sport and add a great deal of excitement.
Above comments from Gatecliffe taken from today's League Weekly.
If feasible financially (and I remain to be convinced that the cash is there either at the clubs or Sky to finance this) it would be easily the best option, with a yearly licensed 'election' from whichever tier is below - top 1 or 2 apply if they meet criteria, not necessarily to replace a failing club in SL2
Rugby League is a sport that desperately needs to expand its geographical supporter base and its player base. This imperative means that all other requirements are secondary until this is done.
All power in the game should be with governing bodies, especially international governing bodies.
Without these actions we will remain a minor sport internationally and nationally.
All power in the game should be with governing bodies, especially international governing bodies.
Without these actions we will remain a minor sport internationally and nationally.
#3
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:47 PM
Would the ten SL1 clubs really allow £4.8m? to go out of there league?
#4
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:54 PM
Again, another case of the "haves" dictating the ways and means of the game. I wonder if Gatcliffe would have been so supportive of a two-tier system 10 years ago when the Wire weren't near the top of the tree*. Everyone will be up for it, providing they are in the top Super League.
(*assuming Gatcliffe was at Warrington back then, I don't know but I do know TRLers would be quick to point it out if he wasn't)
(*assuming Gatcliffe was at Warrington back then, I don't know but I do know TRLers would be quick to point it out if he wasn't)
#5
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:58 PM
Sounds like a silly idea to me..
Newham Dockers - Rugby League For East London. 100% Cockney Rugby League!
Twitter: @NewhamDockersRL - Get following!
Twitter: @NewhamDockersRL - Get following!
#6
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:00 PM
Hope this happens with 2 up 2 down get a bit of variety in the leagues
#7
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:05 PM
But won't the gap in funding just make it the same few teams up and down each year? After all if the two teams promoted can pay the higher cap, why aren't they there in the first place? I reckon it would add variety by diluting the bottom yo-yo teams who can't quite compete with the full cap over and over again. Unless I'm missing something...!
#8
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:08 PM
My thoughts exactly.It will be back to the old days.£800,000 is a lot of money to find for most clubs.But won't the gap in funding just make it the same few teams up and down each year? After all if the two teams promoted can pay the higher cap, why aren't they there in the first place? I reckon it would add variety by diluting the bottom yo-yo teams who can't quite compete with the full cap over and over again. Unless I'm missing something...!
Leeds Rhinos,STILL the only Grand Final winning club NOT to have cheated the salary cap.WCC Champions 2012.
#9
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:11 PM
Maybe it would but untill something different is done we will never know, u never know someone like a Leeds or saints culd av a poor year and get relegated
#10
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:11 PM
Gatcliffe is out of order, Warrington are in a healthy position (on and off the field ) and he has no right to make a suggestion.
FFS - all the clubs are taking about it, not just Gatcliffe, they'll have a chance to vote!!!!!!
FFS - all the clubs are taking about it, not just Gatcliffe, they'll have a chance to vote!!!!!!
#11
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:15 PM
Clubs like Leeds and Saints will have that money if they do get relegated and then promoted,could the same be said of other clubs?Maybe it would but untill something different is done we will never know, u never know someone like a Leeds or saints culd av a poor year and get relegated
Leeds Rhinos,STILL the only Grand Final winning club NOT to have cheated the salary cap.WCC Champions 2012.
#12
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:19 PM
maybe not but at the moment the poor clubs are just plodding along at the bottom of superleague at least with a division below they will find there right levelClubs like Leeds and Saints will have that money if they do get relegated and then promoted,could the same be said of other clubs?
#13
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:24 PM
Although I'm being selfish because I wuld want fev to be in super league 2, but it could also be a good idea
#14
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:26 PM
I was trying to generalise the best I could, whilst using the example of Gatcliffe provided. I've no doubt McMannus will also raise the issue in agreement a days from now. And now we can add Koukash, except he'd want to be in the top tier. Go back 6 months and this would be unthinkable. And I don't even know where my team would fit, we're not rich but (without unearthing old feelings) hopefully on a keel of self sufficiency from now.Gatcliffe is out of order, Warrington are in a healthy position (on and off the field ) and he has no right to make a suggestion.
FFS - all the clubs are taking about it, not just Gatcliffe, they'll have a chance to vote!!!!!!
#15
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:27 PM
What's the point of having a 2 tier super league? everyone will just regard the second tier as division 2......so why not cut BS, call a spade-a-spade etc and call for a reduction in the no. of clubs in super league
#16
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:30 PM
I can see why, to bridge the gap between the two competitions.What's the point of having a 2 tier super league? everyone will just regard the second tier as division 2......so why not cut BS, call a spade-a-spade etc and call for a reduction in the no. of clubs in super league
That's my perfect world theory anyway.
#17
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:32 PM
Although I'm being selfish because I wuld want fev to be in super league 2, but it could also be a good idea
So after all their efforts Fev would still not be in the top teer.
#18
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:34 PM
I can see why, to bridge the gap between the two competitions.
That's my perfect world theory anyway.
oh right, sort of like the way a division 2 bridges the gap between division 1 and 3 then?
#19
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:41 PM
So after all their efforts Fev would still not be in the top teer.
At least their chance of promotion would be in their own hands not the RFL's.
#20
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:41 PM
I was trying to generalise the best I could, whilst using the example of Gatcliffe provided. I've no doubt McMannus will also raise the issue in agreement a days from now. And now we can add Koukash, except he'd want to be in the top tier. Go back 6 months and this would be unthinkable. And I don't even know where my team would fit, we're not rich but (without unearthing old feelings) hopefully on a keel of self sufficiency from now.
IIRC this was discussed 6 months ago, just after the Bulls issues.... No Dig ( I Promise you, I'm changed in attitude towards you guys)
Our biggest problem we have no ff-ing sponsors, our game is a joke at present with some fantastic clubs and wonderful players for once.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











