Holliday backs Chambers
Started by
Barnie
, Mar 21 2013 10:56 AM
17 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 21 March 2013 - 11:23 AM
X 2
"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"
#3
Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:06 PM
and me...
#4
Posted 21 March 2013 - 02:47 PM
And me
Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little.
Edmund Burke
#5
Posted 21 March 2013 - 04:06 PM
Good interview with Gary Chambers at Salfordonline. Read it if you are skeptocal about his appointment it may allay your fears a little. But if you have already made up your mind on the subject maybe not.
Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little.
Edmund Burke
#6
Posted 21 March 2013 - 05:06 PM
"The only negative I can see starting out will be waiting for people to get to know me, and see what I'm about. I'll be damned if I'll let Swinton lose any identity even though I've been at Warrington for that length of time".
His words not mine!
His words not mine!
"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"
#7
Posted 21 March 2013 - 06:14 PM
"The only negative I can see starting out will be waiting for people to get to know me, and see what I'm about. I'll be damned if I'll let Swinton lose any identity even though I've been at Warrington for that length of time".
His words not mine!
You can't really argue with that!
I'll be behind him all the way, although I don't think that was the issue with his appointment.
#8
Posted 23 March 2013 - 11:51 AM
I don't think that was the issue with his appointment.
Quite right. To use a bit of football parlance - playing the man and not the ball.
Gary Chambers is not the custodian of Swinton Lion's future identity. John Kidd is.
Rugby League - great game, shame about the administration.
#9
Posted 23 March 2013 - 12:16 PM
True but he has to have a modicum of input into the direction of the club or else what is the point of him being there. His input with regards to match day prep and tactics will obviously affect results (hopefully positively) on the pitch, which in turn will affect policy off it. Its simple win matches and the crowds will come back, they started to in the championship season. Regardless of where we play if we create a positive winning mentality on the pitch the rest will fall into place.Quite right. To use a bit of football parlance - playing the man and not the ball.
Gary Chambers is not the custodian of Swinton Lion's future identity. John Kidd is.
Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little.
Edmund Burke
#10
Posted 23 March 2013 - 02:15 PM
Quite right. To use a bit of football parlance - playing the man and not the ball.
Gary Chambers is not the custodian of Swinton Lion's future identity. John Kidd is.
So what would you rather he say Phil? "Personally Im not arsed about Swinton's identity, Im not the custodian of it"?
Then again I think you would!
"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"
#11
Posted 23 March 2013 - 04:06 PM
True but he has to have a modicum of input into the direction of the club or else what is the point of him being there. His input with regards to match day prep and tactics will obviously affect results (hopefully positively) on the pitch, which in turn will affect policy off it. Its simple win matches and the crowds will come back, they started to in the championship season. Regardless of where we play if we create a positive winning mentality on the pitch the rest will fall into place.
The thing I'm struggling with is - if you have to fill the side with Warrington players in order to win a match, there has to come a point where it feels like a hollow win.
Rugby League - great game, shame about the administration.
#12
Posted 23 March 2013 - 04:07 PM
So what would you rather he say Phil? "Personally Im not arsed about Swinton's identity, Im not the custodian of it"?
Then again I think you would!
I think one thing we might be able to agree on is - on taking the post Gary Chambers didn't say anything that you wouldn't have expected him to say.
Rugby League - great game, shame about the administration.
#13
Posted 23 March 2013 - 04:14 PM
Effectively Phil, anything he said wouldn't have received your approval.
#14
Posted 23 March 2013 - 04:27 PM
I think one thing we might be able to agree on is - on taking the post Gary Chambers didn't say anything that you wouldn't have expected him to say.
Rather ridiculous statement Phil as no coach is going to say anything he's not expected to say on taking up a position, unless he doesn't want to stay long!
"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"
#15
Posted 26 March 2013 - 01:35 PM
We should instigate a "Mock the Week" style thread - "What not to say when you've just become coach of Swinton Lions"Rather ridiculous statement Phil as no coach is going to say anything he's not expected to say on taking up a position, unless he doesn't want to stay long!
Swinton RLFC est 1866 - Supplying England with players when most of your clubs were in nappies
#16
Posted 26 March 2013 - 04:12 PM
We should instigate a "Mock the Week" style thread - "What not to say when you've just become coach of Swinton Lions"
"I think PhillH is correct in what he says"!
"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"
#17
Posted 26 March 2013 - 06:25 PM
Too many to consider....
"I think a new Stadium in Darwen would increase attendances"
or
"When they said Swinton I thought they meant Swindon"
or finally
"My dad John is the Chairman"
"I think a new Stadium in Darwen would increase attendances"
or
"When they said Swinton I thought they meant Swindon"
or finally
"My dad John is the Chairman"
#18
Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:58 PM
"I think PhillH is correct in what he says"!
I agree "not" or do I.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














