Jump to content


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

The Black Card

Novel disciplinary idea

  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,652 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:05 AM

Here's a novel idea to combat the professional foul, introduced for 2014 by the GAA.

Commit a professional foul (there are five specific offences listed), and you get a black card. You go off but you get subbed.

A team is allowed three black cards. After that, you're just off - no sub.

Discuss. :)
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#2 RLDave

RLDave
  • Coach
  • 694 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:07 AM

10 mins in't bin would be better
@ohcallicalli

You can't beat an owl!

#3 MidlandsRugbyLeague

MidlandsRugbyLeague
  • Coach
  • 975 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:14 AM

Depends on what the offences are. They can only refer to technical offences otherwise its a free reign at Foul Play.

#4 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,652 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:18 AM

Depends on what the offences are. They can only refer to technical offences otherwise its a free reign at Foul Play.


Foul play's still covered by your soccer system of reds and yellows.

The interesting comment is that refs would be less reluctant to give a black card, knowing that the team wouldn't be reduced to 14 men.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#5 longboard

longboard
  • Coach
  • 2,295 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:25 AM

The offences are not technical ones.

I think using a black card might be more use in RU, than RL.

Link here:-

http://www.rte.ie/sp...ht-at-congress/

#6 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,652 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:37 AM

The offences are not technical ones.

I think using a black card might be more use in RU, than RL.

Link here:-

http://www.rte.ie/sp...ht-at-congress/


Thanks for that bit of research. The offences certainly aren't what I'd have listed myself.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#7 bearman

bearman
  • Coach
  • 2,320 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:41 AM

5. Arguing with match official in an aggressive manner.
The way we are going this might help.
Ron Banks
Bears and Barrow

#8 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 12,778 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 12:51 PM

If the ref brings any more cards out Wigan would sign Paul Daniels.

          NO BUTS IT'S GOT TO BE BUTTER......                                 Z1N2MybzplQR6XBrwB9egniMH8xqYQ5s.jpg                                                                                                                     


#9 markleeds

markleeds
  • Coach
  • 1,621 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 01:27 PM

Consistency from the refs would help.

#10 longboard

longboard
  • Coach
  • 2,295 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:10 PM

Thanks for that bit of research. The offences certainly aren't what I'd have listed myself.


No research. As a follower of gaelic games I was looking at this yesterday.

#11 longboard

longboard
  • Coach
  • 2,295 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:11 PM

Consistency from the refs would help.


It will happen when players and supporters are consistent. :)

#12 Loiner

Loiner
  • Coach
  • 313 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 02:59 PM

Utter guff

#13 Southstander13

Southstander13
  • Coach
  • 1,259 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 03:04 PM

I always have trouble remembering this, but is there only certain offences that allow a yellow card to be issued? Im sure its only professional fouls (although fighting is included in this too).

#14 Marauder

Marauder
  • Coach
  • 11,782 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 10:44 PM

IMO yellow and red cards are enough, for being aggressive towards an official should be a red.
Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.



http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/

#15 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,652 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 08:07 AM

Hmm - maybe we're getting too hung up on card colours. A wider point might be whether to allow a substitute for a player sent off.

Advantages (maybe)

a. Sometimes spoils the game as a contest if players are sent off
b. Referees might be less reluctant to send a player off early in the game because of (a) above
c. Players might be more careful early in the game because of (B) above
d. Teams are still handicapped by having less subs, but not so dramatically

Disadvantages

a. Not how we've traditionally dealt with it

I'm not sold on it either way.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#16 Southstander13

Southstander13
  • Coach
  • 1,259 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:15 AM

Hmm - maybe we're getting too hung up on card colours. A wider point might be whether to allow a substitute for a player sent off.

Advantages (maybe)

a. Sometimes spoils the game as a contest if players are sent off
b. Referees might be less reluctant to send a player off early in the game because of (a) above
c. Players might be more careful early in the game because of ( B) above
d. Teams are still handicapped by having less subs, but not so dramatically

Disadvantages

a. Not how we've traditionally dealt with it

I'm not sold on it either way.


Big problem with this suggestion is:

Team A player knocks Team B player out with late, high challenge.

Team A player is sent off, sub comes on, Team A have one less sub to use.

Team B player is injured and cannot continue, Team B have one less sub to use.

Team A average player was told to take Team B star player out.

Team A now have an advantage over Team B despite having a man sent off.

#17 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,652 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:36 AM

Big problem with this suggestion is:

Team A player knocks Team B player out with late, high challenge.

Team A player is sent off, sub comes on, Team A have one less sub to use.

Team B player is injured and cannot continue, Team B have one less sub to use.

Team A average player was told to take Team B star player out.

Team A now have an advantage over Team B despite having a man sent off.


True.

On the other hand, under the current rules ......

Team A player gets sent off early in game.

Team B gain unexpected win as a result of having the extra man.

Team C who weren't even there, get relegated as a result.

You can always invent a scenario to prove your point.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#18 Southstander13

Southstander13
  • Coach
  • 1,259 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 01:39 PM

You can always invent a scenario to prove your point.


Appreciate that but if a player commits a foul that warrants a sending off, I dont see how its any punishment to the team if they can bring a sub on to replace them.

Leeds didnt even use one of their subs against catalans despite being down to 12 men on the pitch with two others injured during the game! For me it would potentially see teams targetting players to get them out the game without fear of really going a man down.

As a slight aside, what has been suggested before is that if a player is injured by foul play and cannot return to the field for that game, then an 18th man can be used so as not to disadvantage the team that suffered the injury.

#19 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,652 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 02:39 PM

Appreciate that but if a player commits a foul that warrants a sending off, I dont see how its any punishment to the team if they can bring a sub on to replace them.


Should you punish the team or the player ?
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#20 Bulliac

Bulliac
  • Coach
  • 2,666 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 02:43 PM

It will happen when players and supporters are consistent. :)

Players and fans are always consistent.

Players will always try to steal an advantage [if the ref is prepared to let them, and some are more 'prepared' than others; hence the inconsistency] and fans will always feel the ref is against them [whatever he does], how consistent do you want them to be?
No team is an island.........................................

http://www.flickr.co...s/31337109@N03/




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users