Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Farage poles the electorate


  • Please log in to reply
339 replies to this topic

#81 Shadow

Shadow
  • Coach
  • 8,033 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 02:13 PM

On our bus to the Army Navy game yesterday we had a number of juniors along, aged from 9 to 13 so for the purposes of acceptable standards of language the euphemisms "farage" and "clifford" were allowable in place of the more traditional "f" & "c" bombs. 


God Rides a Harley but the Devil rides a Ducati!

#82 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 16,833 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 02:18 PM

A couple of Telegraph articles:

 

Ken Clarke:  UKIP voters "closet racists"

 

Vince Cable (still a Lib Dem last time I checked):  Pensioners should be next for benefit clawbacks

 

Ah well.  Also, going by Labour's less than stellar opposition, do you think no-one really wants to win the next election?


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#83 Ullman

Ullman
  • Coach
  • 7,450 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 02:39 PM

I hope that UKIP do very well its time that the left wing champagne socialist (Tories/Labour and Lib Dems they are all the same in my book with as NF says not a cigarette paper between them) got a bloody good hiding:))))

As time goes on UKIP will be able to have a better quality of person standing and hopefully also there will be a few defections from the champagne socialist lefties especially the tories who are more left wing than that other criminal champagne socialist TONY BLAG:))))

CM

The champagne socialists, that notorious political sekt.


"I own up. I am a serial risk taker. I live in a flood zone, cycle without a helmet, drink alcohol and on Sunday I had bacon for breakfast."


#84 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,115 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 04:36 PM

Vince Cable (still a Lib Dem last time I checked):  Pensioners should be next for benefit clawbacks

I agree with Vince.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#85 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,115 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 05:02 PM

It comes from the government and that would be true whether it was ring-fenced or not.

It comes from the government and that would be true whether it was ring-fenced or not.

Adopted roads are maintained via income from council tax.

Councils collect that themselves.

A would-be councillor should be aware of that.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#86 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,115 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 05:03 PM

I hope that UKIP do very well its time that the left wing champagne socialist (Tories/Labour and Lib Dems they are all the same in my book with as NF says not a cigarette paper between them) got a bloody good hiding:))))

As time goes on UKIP will be able to have a better quality of person standing and hopefully also there will be a few defections from the champagne socialist lefties especially the tories who are more left wing than that other criminal champagne socialist TONY BLAG:))))

CM

Thank you for confirming that they are basically the Tea Party.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#87 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,496 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 07:13 PM

Thank you for confirming that they are basically the Tea Party.

 

:lol: The Tea Party, without the intellect and a sense of decency.  :lol:


"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."

#88 Just Browny

Just Browny
  • Coach
  • 11,721 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 10:10 PM

Interesting that Canetman stylises Farage's name as 'NF'.

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.


#89 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 16,833 posts

Posted 28 April 2013 - 11:42 PM

I agree with Vince.

A universal benefit is cheap to administer, no means testing, no massive back-end staff requirement, no 3rd rate IT system costing £100m+, no appeals, no loophole abuses, no incorrectly denied people.  It's just a cheap gimmick quote from someone who has been hanging around with the Tories for too long.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#90 Steve May

Steve May
  • Coach
  • 10,111 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:14 AM

I agree with Vince.

Better move quickly. By next week he'll be saying something totally different.

That's me.  I'm done.


#91 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,115 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 05:43 AM

Better move quickly. By next week he'll be saying something totally different.

Just so long as he said "Ed Balls" yesterday.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#92 Steve May

Steve May
  • Coach
  • 10,111 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 06:26 AM

Just so long as he said "Ed Balls" yesterday.

Ed Balls

That's me.  I'm done.


#93 tim2

tim2
  • Coach
  • 8,305 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:37 AM

Ed Balls

One day late
North Derbyshire Chargers - join the stampede

Marathon in 2014 - the hard work starts now

#94 Steve May

Steve May
  • Coach
  • 10,111 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:11 PM

One day late

:)

I was quite impressed that Ed Balls himself tweeted Ed Balls on Ed Balls day.

That's me.  I'm done.


#95 Wolford6

Wolford6
  • Coach
  • 10,062 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:19 PM

I bet his wife still never cracked a genuine smile.


Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police


#96 ShotgunGold

ShotgunGold
  • Coach
  • 858 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 04:59 PM

The three main parties are too similar now. I think UKIP represents good libertarian views for people who believe that the government are way too involved with the lives of the people of this country. For too long the mainstream political arena has been banging on about rights, without talking about responsibilities; talking too much about what the government can do, without explaining what the individual should be doing; and are increasing trying to "socially engineer" outcomes and conclusions. Successive governments now seem to be trying to put out fires that only individuals themselves can put out and in many cases they are wasting a lot of money and effort in doing so.

 

Combine this with the fact that UKIP see the European Union as a drain on our resources - as essentially a transfer of money from the rich UK to the poor Eastern Europe; and take a much more skeptical approach on the supposed 'benefits' of immigration (I still fail to see how any Romanian or Bulgarian immigrants are actually going to significantly benefit the country).

 

Of course it's not all good - many of the UKIP candidates will be incredibly inexperienced compared to Lib/Lab/Con candidates which will likely cause a few problems later on. I think Farage is a strong character but you rarely hear from any other members of UKIP.

 

UKIP will never become a political heavyweight but like many Continental European parties who are either mid/far left or right I see no reason why they can't hover around the 6-12% mark. Of course though, an increasingly Socialist European Union whose 'grand plan' is to shift British, French and German money to the failing countries of the South and the Soviet legacy countries of the East, is bound to occasionally cause support to hit 12-20% sometimes. 



#97 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,496 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 09:04 PM

The three main parties are too similar now. I think UKIP represents good libertarian views for people who believe that the government are way too involved with the lives of the people of this country. For too long the mainstream political arena has been banging on about rights, without talking about responsibilities; talking too much about what the government can do, without explaining what the individual should be doing; and are increasing trying to "socially engineer" outcomes and conclusions. Successive governments now seem to be trying to put out fires that only individuals themselves can put out and in many cases they are wasting a lot of money and effort in doing so.

 

Combine this with the fact that UKIP see the European Union as a drain on our resources - as essentially a transfer of money from the rich UK to the poor Eastern Europe; and take a much more skeptical approach on the supposed 'benefits' of immigration (I still fail to see how any Romanian or Bulgarian immigrants are actually going to significantly benefit the country).

 

Of course it's not all good - many of the UKIP candidates will be incredibly inexperienced compared to Lib/Lab/Con candidates which will likely cause a few problems later on. I think Farage is a strong character but you rarely hear from any other members of UKIP.

 

UKIP will never become a political heavyweight but like many Continental European parties who are either mid/far left or right I see no reason why they can't hover around the 6-12% mark. Of course though, an increasingly Socialist European Union whose 'grand plan' is to shift British, French and German money to the failing countries of the South and the Soviet legacy countries of the East, is bound to occasionally cause support to hit 12-20% sometimes. 

 

 

The three main parties are too similar now.

 

I think there's a case for saying that, but trying to portray yourself as different by adopting every prejudice known to man isn't very clever.

 

I think UKIP represents good libertarian views for people who believe that the government are way too involved with the lives of the people of this country.

 

The word libertarian is probably the most abused word in politics just now. What makes you think UKIP is a libertarian party? To me they come across as authoritarian, and they seem to want restrict freedoms rather than enable them, eg freedom of movement.

 

For too long the mainstream political arena has been banging on about rights, without talking about responsibilities; talking too much about what the government can do, without explaining what the individual should be doing; and are increasing trying to "socially engineer" outcomes and conclusions.

 

I can't think of any mainstream politician (rather than the arena) that actually mentions rights without unthinkingly tagging on the word responsibilities. And, returning to your earlier point about the parties being the same, the mainstream parties are united in their rhetoric about using the private sector more and the public less. Who is advocating the reversal of privatisation or outsourcing?

Social engineering? Are you seriously trying to say that UKIP are not interested in social engineering? What is the prevention of gay marriage for what appears to be nothing other than blind prejudice?

 

Successive governments now seem to be trying to put out fires that only individuals themselves can put out and in many cases they are wasting a lot of money and effort in doing so.

 

A pretty meaningless statement. Some fires can be put out by the individual, on other occasions the fire is so out of control that it needs a robust, collective, yes, even state solution.

 

Combine this with the fact that UKIP see the European Union as a drain on our resources - as essentially a transfer of money from the rich UK to the poor Eastern Europe; and take a much more skeptical approach on the supposed 'benefits' of immigration (I still fail to see how any Romanian or Bulgarian immigrants are actually going to significantly benefit the country).

 

Now we get to the guts of UKIP - the fear of the foreign, whether that's pooling sovereignty with other countries (whether through the EU, NATO, or other organisations created by treaty), or strange looking or sounding people from 'elsewhere'. Oh, and 'libertarianism' goes out of the window when the person wanting to legitimately trade or work is eastern Europe. 

 

Of course it's not all good - many of the UKIP candidates will be incredibly inexperienced compared to Lib/Lab/Con candidates which will likely cause a few problems later on. I think Farage is a strong character but you rarely hear from any other members of UKIP.

I'm struggling to think of any part of UKIP that is 'good'. It seems to be a receptacle for angry middle-aged men and prejudiced people who latch onto any conspiracy theory going. Farage may be the only personality but, as we're seeing in this campaign, there may be a fair few personality disorders about.

 

UKIP will never become a political heavyweight but like many Continental European parties who are either mid/far left or right I see no reason why they can't hover around the 6-12% mark. Of course though, an increasingly Socialist European Union whose 'grand plan' is to shift British, French and German money to the failing countries of the South and the Soviet legacy countries of the East, is bound to occasionally cause support to hit 12-20% sometimes.

 

Now we get to the heart of UKIP's 'big lie' that gullible people succumb to: the socialist EU. That is as laughable as that other 'slogan' Ukippers have used in the past - EUSSR - seeing as the EU is, has been, and will be dominated by the centre-right.


"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."

#98 Phil

Phil
  • Coach
  • 1,906 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 09:37 PM

http://www.independe...rs-8424478.html

 

yeah they suspended him after it became news

 

But they adopted him as a candidate first.


"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

#99 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 20,040 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 09:44 PM

Hmmmm.... there is , in my opinion and experience, at least a slight difference between what one may term  left and right in the UK and left and right in mainland Europe. 

 

France is clearly socialist at present, though even under the right wing of Sarkozy, France was still very much to the left of New Labour in terms of the way the public sector worked, the power of the unions in health, transport etc

 

My idea of the right is of rolling back the state, reducing taxes but this does not seem to figure in say Germany. 

 

Clearly the "EU" isn't entirely socialist as it is pushing privatization very hard. It is though , a bit like the old USSR in that it is crippled by bureaucracy seemingly as a way of creating employment rather than trying to devolve as much as possible to the nation states. I was in Leningrad in 1975 and believe me, the paralysis by bureaucracy was to die for!!



#100 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,496 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 04:02 AM

http://www.independe...rs-8424478.html

 

yeah they suspended him after it became news

 

But they adopted him as a candidate first.

 

Compulsory abortion? Aye, libertarian!


"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users