Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Martyn Sadler and Andy Wilson hint at behind the scenes restructure of Super League


  • Please log in to reply
207 replies to this topic

#1 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 969 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 12:34 PM

......In this weeks SL Backchat programme. 

 

There is a clear point made by Andy Wilson and Martyn Sadler in the first few minutes of the programme, hinting at a restructure headed by Brian Barwick for the 2015 season, wonder what they have up their sleeves.

 

http://www1.skysport...back-chat-ep-12



#2 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,496 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 01:31 PM

"Fewer clubs taking more of the broadcasting money"?


"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."

#3 Grinner

Grinner
  • Coach
  • 451 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 01:54 PM

I took it as "two tens" coming in?

#4 Wolford6

Wolford6
  • Coach
  • 10,026 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 02:37 PM

I saw it. When Stevo said "Superleague isn't working" , my immediate thought was that he had been prompted to say that in the pre-broadcast production meeting.

 

Sky calls the tune and we'll get a structure that Sky wants.

 

This may not be a bad thing because Sky has lost a lot of its rugby union coverage to BT ... freeing up cash and airtime.


Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police


#5 RidingPie

RidingPie
  • Coach
  • 1,207 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 02:57 PM

I'm not so sure Wolford, I don't think anyone can tell Stevo what to say and expect him to say it if he doesn't agree. Maybe Martyn could comment on some of the things he's heard /read for those of us out of the loop (unless he's gagged in some way?)



#6 jt

jt
  • Coach
  • 1,696 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 02:59 PM

It's been on the agenda for months and the top teams along with sky will get what they want. Some S/L clubs find it hard now they would be in alot of trouble if they don't do what sky want

#7 Martyn Sadler

Martyn Sadler

    League Publications Ltd

  • Moderator
  • 2,823 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:21 PM

Just to clarify this, the Super League clubs meet next Wednesday and there will be a presentation to them discussing a range of options.

 

But this isn't being driven by Sky, although it's worth bearing in mind that the Sky contract does specify a minimum of 12 clubs and 24 weeks of competition, so the ten-team scenario seems highly unlikely.

 

In my view the Super League clubs would be remarkably stupid to reduce the size of the competition. In doing so they would not be addressing the main issue which, as I said on the programme, is the game's apparent inability to generate commercial income. Reducing the footprint of the competition would only make that job even harder.



#8 Bomb Jack

Bomb Jack
  • Coach
  • 2,020 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:24 PM

It will be interesting how they choose the 10 Clubs in SL1.

 

I for one won't be happy if we miss out!


Widnes - Super League's newest Club, and Cheshire's Original Glamour Club. Watch out Warrington, we're back !

#9 RidingPie

RidingPie
  • Coach
  • 1,207 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:25 PM

Thanks for clearing that up Martyn, I'll look forward to hearing the results of meeting. I think we all know that something is going wrong commercially with the sport (and most of us have many differing suggestions of what is wrong), how to fix it though is a different matter all together. 



#10 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,094 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:26 PM

it's worth bearing in mind that the Sky contract does specify a minimum of 12 clubs and 24 weeks of competition, so the ten-team scenario seems highly unlikely.

Thanks for this info.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#11 cookey

cookey
  • Coach
  • 1,137 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:35 PM

So Canetman wrong again - no surprise there.



#12 hindle xiii

hindle xiii
  • Coach
  • 21,062 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:49 PM

It will be interesting how they choose the 10 Clubs in SL1.

 

I for one won't be happy if we miss out!

That's the flaw in the 10 Clubs in SL1 plan, everyone is ok with it...

 

... as long as they are in SL1 competition.

 

In my opinion, at the moment, I think only Castleford fans are aware they might face the chop. But fans of the other 13 clubs would be adamant - with good reason - why they MUST be in SL1.


2826856.jpg?type=articleLandscape

 

On Odsal Top baht 'at.


#13 foozler

foozler
  • Coach
  • 969 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:58 PM

Just to clarify this, the Super League clubs meet next Wednesday and there will be a presentation to them discussing a range of options.

 

But this isn't being driven by Sky, although it's worth bearing in mind that the Sky contract does specify a minimum of 12 clubs and 24 weeks of competition, so the ten-team scenario seems highly unlikely.

 

In my view the Super League clubs would be remarkably stupid to reduce the size of the competition. In doing so they would not be addressing the main issue which, as I said on the programme, is the game's apparent inability to generate commercial income. Reducing the footprint of the competition would only make that job even harder.

 

Any chance you can clarify whether that minimum of 12 clubs specifies a required geographic spread?

 

Thanks



#14 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 17,130 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 04:06 PM

But this isn't being driven by Sky, although it's worth bearing in mind that the Sky contract does specify a minimum of 12 clubs and 24 weeks of competition, so the ten-team scenario seems highly unlikely.

Thank you, so I assume the smart money is on 12 clubs.

However Hudgell predicted this long ago.

His version was with "central funding for London".

#15 EastLondonMike

EastLondonMike
  • Coach
  • 4,183 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 04:25 PM

I wonder what chance a ten team superleague and an additional competition to fill the TV schedule gaps... Expanded WCC maybe?..  9's comp?.. Exiles series?..


Newham Dockers - Champions 2013. Rugby League For East London. 100% Cockney Rugby League!

Twitter: @NewhamDockersRL - Get following!

www.newhamdockers.co.uk


#16 Mumby Magic

Mumby Magic
  • Coach
  • 3,158 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 04:31 PM

The clubs have lost focus on the main thing that can drive clubs forward: Marketing. Changing to two tiers 11, 12 14 or 16 with French, Welsh clubs won't make one smidgen of difference if clubs don't market themselves properly. After the so called boom of SL the clubs and the game didn't move forward and things get forgotten. Wasn't Waite suppose to set up a coching programme to have an ever growing list of English coaches? IN the time since we have seen Edwards, Farrell and Ford to name a few gobbled up by RU. If we through aguess as to howmany in SL were properly marketed to the hilt I'd say no more than 4. I'm not saying clubs aren't marketing I mean to their full potential.

Lilly, Jacob and Isaac, what my life is about. Although our route through life is not how it should be, I am a blessed man.


#17 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 14,692 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 04:49 PM

What year does the current contract run to?

#18 a.n Other

a.n Other
  • Coach
  • 1,548 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 05:06 PM


I wonder what chance a ten team superleague and an additional competition to fill the TV schedule gaps... Expanded WCC maybe?.. 9's comp?.. Exiles series?..


Apparently one of the ideas muted could only have come from an accountant, what ever that means.

Edited by a.n Other, 24 April 2013 - 05:06 PM.


#19 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 969 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 05:08 PM


Just to clarify this, the Super League clubs meet next Wednesday and there will be a presentation to them discussing a range of options.

But this isn't being driven by Sky, although it's worth bearing in mind that the Sky contract does specify a minimum of 12 clubs and 24 weeks of competition, so the ten-team scenario seems highly unlikely.

In my view the Super League clubs would be remarkably stupid to reduce the size of the competition. In doing so they would not be addressing the main issue which, as I said on the programme, is the game's apparent inability to generate commercial income. Reducing the footprint of the competition would only make that job even harder.


Thanks for the additional info, id be interested to hear what Brian Barwick presents in his first press conference.

#20 jt

jt
  • Coach
  • 1,696 posts

Posted 24 April 2013 - 06:18 PM

Does anyone know who will make the final decision (RFL or/and S/L) and if its a vote of some kind will all clubs get a vote or will it just be the S/L clubs




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users