Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

LEE BRIERS


  • Please log in to reply
141 replies to this topic

#21 Just Browny

Just Browny
  • Coach
  • 11,729 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 06:36 PM

and who's fault is that?


Not Warrington's, we voted against scrapping the academy league. HTH.

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.


#22 Terry Mullaney

Terry Mullaney
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 08:34 PM


Aah well. Jarred Haynes, Willie Mason etc. have returned to the NRL through the second-tier feeder comp NSW Cup. This is no different.


Except that the Championship isn't a feeder league and this isn't Australia. I saw your other post before it was deleted. Disgraceful

Edited by Terry Mullaney, 30 April 2013 - 08:37 PM.

Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request

http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/

#23 oldrover

oldrover
  • Coach
  • 6,031 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 09:21 PM

Not Warrington's, we voted against scrapping the academy league. HTH.

no it doesn't. i asked who's fault it was, not who's fault it wasn't


joe mullaney is a god
the only good tiger is a stuffed tiger

Posted Image

#24 WolvesFanInTheUSA

WolvesFanInTheUSA
  • Players
  • 41 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 09:26 PM

Reading some of the responses here has me confused.  Where are we getting the notion that the Super League is losing players? :huh:

 

Briers knows he's not 100% for a SL game, so what better way to get back into shape than to play for Swinton?  Why not, Paul Wood did. 

And Lee did say he'll hopefully be back in time for Salford.  I think this is a brilliant move.

 

http://www.superleag...-swinton-outing

 

And speaking of losing players to the NRL (which was pointed out in Boots N' All last week), look at all the top notch players from Aus

that's on the Exiles team.  If anything, I see both sides swapping good talent.  My apologies, but I can't see the worry.



#25 shaun mc

shaun mc
  • Coach
  • 1,660 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 09:40 PM

Yes its ok for the Wolves......fair enough Briers gets match fitness.
Absolutely no way should he be influencing a Championship game.

#26 bearman

bearman
  • Coach
  • 2,369 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 09:44 PM


So who wins in the long run?
Briers gets a run out on his road to fitness... WIN
Warrington get a player acclimatised to the speed of the game......Win
Whitehaven get to face a real star of the game....LOSE
Swinton get a star player that could win them the game....WIN ( short term) but they also pee off their coach that is told who he must play...LOSE....the other Swinton players have to get used to a different style of play for one week...LOSE...
A very disgruntled player loses his place in the team( loss of wages) ...Lose , EVERY other Swinton Player knows that there is a better player waiting to boot him out of the team if someone at another club decides they want him dropped to make way for their star.

Yes, it helps the Superleague but does nothing for the Championship clubs
Ron Banks
Bears and Barrow

#27 Lounge Room Lizard

Lounge Room Lizard
  • Coach
  • 6,425 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 09:46 PM

Playing the likes of Briers at Swinton makes a mockery of the championship. It starts to make the Championship a lottery. Whitehaven would normally beat Swinton. But they could miss out on a playoff spot costing them money if Briers inspires Swinton to a win. It could also cost a team Relegation. The RFL should have sorted the EXACT rules out and made them public before the season started. So far its gone away from what it was announced as and there is much confusion over which club certain players are at. As for the idiot Goldcoaster- The Championship was a good comp and is and never has been a feeder comp. You clearly have no idea on the Championship or the European game by posting such rubbish. There are atleast 3 teams that are in a better state than a number of SL teams and also can field academy teams which SL clubs fail to do.

#28 TaxiEgg

TaxiEgg
  • Coach
  • 2,757 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 10:07 PM

Will you all please stop criticising the RFL they are doing a fantastic job in all aspects of the game . ;)



#29 gillmeister

gillmeister
  • Coach
  • 1,194 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 10:15 PM

Will you all please stop criticising the RFL they are doing a fantastic job in all aspects of the game . ;)

 

The super league clubs and RFL have dropped a huge clanger with how its all been handled but then the majority of the championship clubs could have reached a sensible agreement and didn't self interest always prevails


Forget Chuck and Chad I am the real legend killer

#30 budgiezilla

budgiezilla
  • Coach
  • 190 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 10:20 PM

RFL are so predictable/transparent. They DO NOT give '2 HOOTS' about most championship clubs 'individual ambitions' or else they wouldn't have scrapped the 'over age' ruling in the SL academy. They ARE NOT interested in Leigh, Oldham, Barrow, Swinton, Workington, Whitehaven etc being a top flight club once again.

THEY JUST HAVE NOT GOT THE B@LLS TO SAY SO.....My favourite sport in the world, has been ruined by a bunch of twi(a)ts in suits.



#31 Marauder

Marauder
  • Coach
  • 11,800 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 10:44 PM

Lets not forget that this doesn't stop here! The displaced championship player then moves down the ladder to a lucky amateur club (This causing the same problems Bearman mentioned in the 27th post on this thread) the displaced NCL amateur then moves down into the regional men's league displacing yet another player, this time the displaced player has nowhere else to go for a game, the following week everyone moves back to where they should be except the final displaced player who decides he is going to the coast with his family leaving the bottom team short on match day.


Edited by Marauder, 30 April 2013 - 10:45 PM.

Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.



http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/

#32 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 17,159 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 11:21 PM

The championship does not deserve to be a feeder league simple as! It should be a viably strong standalone division with prospect of promotion.

Well it's not, because there's no money and little interest.

Your solution?

Edited by The Parksider, 30 April 2013 - 11:33 PM.


#33 LOYALION

LOYALION
  • Coach
  • 916 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 11:23 PM

Playing the likes of Briers at Swinton makes a mockery of the championship. It starts to make the Championship a lottery. Whitehaven would normally beat Swinton. But they could miss out on a playoff spot costing them money if Briers inspires Swinton to a win. It could also cost a team Relegation. The RFL should have sorted the EXACT rules out and made them public before the season started. So far its gone away from what it was announced as and there is much confusion over which club certain players are at. As for the idiot Goldcoaster- The Championship was a good comp and is and never has been a feeder comp. You clearly have no idea on the Championship or the European game by posting such rubbish. There are atleast 3 teams that are in a better state than a number of SL teams and also can field academy teams which SL clubs fail to do.


Because they've lost 1 less game than Swinton this season? Stupid statement!

"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"


#34 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 17,159 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 11:24 PM

It helps the Superleague but does nothing for the Championship clubs

It must help the championship if it helps one of it's members?

#35 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 17,159 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 11:27 PM

There are atleast 3 teams that are in a better state than a number of SL teams and also can field academy teams which SL clubs fail to do.

Which CC teams are in a better state "then a number of SL teams"

Which SL clubs fail to field an academy??

#36 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 17,159 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 11:33 PM

RFL are so predictable/transparent. They DO NOT give '2 HOOTS' about most championship clubs They ARE NOT interested in Leigh, Oldham, Barrow, Swinton, Workington, Whitehaven etc being a top flight club once again.

The RFL accepted SKY money for the big clubs to get bigger and the small clubs to rot.

They could have refused the SKY money so that all clubs could stay semi-pro and Leigh, Oldham, Barrow, Swinton, Workington, Whitehaven etc could all have become a top flight club once again, and again over this last 17 years.

Speaking to RL friends in Leeds tonight they say people in Dewsbury, Batley, Hunslet and Halifax don't have the same interest in the game now. Less follow it and the less moan more.

So what about it? Should the RFL have refused to take the SKY money because this money split the clubs??

#37 Ackroman

Ackroman
  • Coach
  • 1,883 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 07:32 AM

Well it's not, because there's no money and little interest.

Your solution?

Certain fans of those clubs don't want DR. Lee Briers is Warrington's problem. So what's your counter argument?

#38 Terry Mullaney

Terry Mullaney
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 07:41 AM

Well it's not, because there's no money and little interest.Your solution?

There also seems to be a fall off of interest at Cas, Salford, London, Huddersfield and Bradford Parky judging by the alarming drop in attendances. Maybe that's why the RFL are actively looking at a possible solution right now. If they come up with the right one, it may well invigorate both leagues hopefully.

This DR shambles isn't helping anyone but SL, look where Swinton are in the table and there's discontent amongst their fan base. It won't exist in its present form after this season.

Edited by Terry Mullaney, 01 May 2013 - 09:59 AM.

Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request

http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/

#39 jpmc

jpmc
  • Coach
  • 502 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 07:53 AM

Yes its ok for the Wolves......fair enough Briers gets match fitness.
Absolutely no way should he be influencing a Championship game.

I hope he scores a try ,sets two more up and wins the game with a last minute drop goal.Just so i can laugh some more at the idiocy of the clubs in the championship for accepting these partnerships

#40 Lounge Room Lizard

Lounge Room Lizard
  • Coach
  • 6,425 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 08:12 AM

Which CC teams are in a better state "then a number of SL teams"

Which SL clubs fail to field an academy??

Fax, Fev and Sheffield are in a better state in a number of ways than London, Castleford and until recently Salford and Bradford. Fev are developing the Stadium-something Cas for example have failed to do despite many nice pictures. Halifax have also a ground that puts Wakefield and Castleford to shame for example. The Ground is being further developed over the summer months with better drainage, new Scoreboard and the North Stand being worked on. Halifax are consistantly making small profit and seeing them in a healthy position especially compared to a number of SL clubs that are losing hundreds of thousands a year, if not more. Sheffield allegedly have one of the best Sponsorship setups within the game and helps them match Fev and Fax despite getting way smaller crowds that them

Salford fail to run an U19s like the rest of the SL clubs. Sheffield and Featherstone who are not in SL manage to do this and fill the gap. But Salford said they couldnt commit to the U19s I believe.Salford do run a U16s/U23s side. But a number of championship sides run U23s and Sheffield, South Wales, Cumbria etc run U16s




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users