Jump to content

Rugby League World - Grand Finals Issue

Try our Fantastic 4-Issue Bundle Offer:
For just £14, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:

The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final drama from both hemispheres plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.

League Express


- - - - -

Gay marriage bill, part 2: The Lords

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 ckn

  • Admin
  • 16,947 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:36 AM

Telegraph linky.  It's like something out of a 1970s sitcom...


"We didn't fight those fuzzie-wuzzies on the beaches just so young men could sodomise each other in time to the Archers theme tune"


"I want gay marriage banned because I want to be called gay when I skip and play outside of Parliament and it not mean something beastly and horrid"


"We swivel-eyed loons don't like these gay people at all, not only am I going to vote against it as it stands but I'll be submitting an amendment that allows such marriage but automatically deports them to our prison island of Australia along with anyone who disagrees with us"


"Bum sex is bad for you you know, the doctors all say it.  It's also not true that I'm so strongly opposed to these things because I'm a frustrated luvvie, I just hated it at school where the older boys would not even give the courtesy of a reacharound."



I still don't get the point of why we persist with the House of Lords.  I thought Labour had 13 years to bring our Parliamentary system fully into the 20th century, never mind the 21st.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway

#2 gingerjon

  • Coach
  • 29,305 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:58 AM

The only argument in favour - and it's weak when you see the current make up of the Lords - is that allows appointments based on skills. So you could have proper scientists, educationalists etc.

Of course instead you get Lord Bufton of Tufton trousering expenses that would make an MEP blush whilst doing sweet FA apart from lamenting the passing of time.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#3 gingerjon

  • Coach
  • 29,305 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:36 PM


Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#4 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,496 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 06:44 PM



Did you get a full house?
"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."