Jump to content


Rugby League World - Grand Finals Issue

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD - THE GRAND FINALS ISSUE - OUT 17 OCT OR DOWNLOAD IT NOW!
Try our Fantastic 4-Issue Bundle Offer:
For just £14, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:

The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final drama from both hemispheres plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Rugby League told to play to its strengths ... but World Cup still waiting for sponsors


  • Please log in to reply
114 replies to this topic

#1 Martyn Sadler

Martyn Sadler

    League Publications Ltd

  • Moderator
  • 2,869 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:07 PM

RESEARCH carried out by media and marketing consultancy Repucom has suggested that Rugby League can generate a larger share of the wider sponsorship market by drawing attention to the profile of its followers.
And, with 76 of the world’s top 100 brands currently investing in sports sponsorship, the payoff for the game could be significant, particularly in a World Cup year.
So far the RFL has been unable to attract any major sponsors for the tournament, largely because of a delay in confirming overseas broadcasting rights.

Click here to view the article

#2 boxhead

boxhead
  • Coach
  • 3,118 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:14 PM

I think the fact there is no major Sponsor for the World Cup or the Super League comp should lead to a change in personnel.

I am worried about all aspects of the game in the UK at the moment.



#3 Pen-Y-Bont Crusader

Pen-Y-Bont Crusader
  • Coach
  • 603 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:14 PM

Very interesting and helpful article Martyn. I'll be using some of the Repucom statistics and information you have provided here in the near future.

 

PBC



#4 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 1,035 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:16 PM

I think the fact there is no major Sponsor for the World Cup or the Super League comp should lead to a change in personnel.

I am worried about all aspects of the game in the UK at the moment.

 

We need another Richard Lewis, someone who has no prior investment within RL to take a more objective approach.



#5 EastLondonMike

EastLondonMike
  • Coach
  • 4,245 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:19 PM

If Leyton Orient can secure Samsung and the FIFA video game as shirt sponsors how the RFL cannot pick up some major names for sponsors is beyond me. I've always thought the RFL look at what money can be made out of a sponsor, rather than what other values a sponsor with a household name could bring to the game. ie they'd rather take £100 from "Colin's Carpets" than £50 from "Sony". Even though partnerships with major brands, someone like a 'Sony", could put the game in a much more positive light than if it had gone with Colin and his carpets and therefore appear more attractive to other sponsors of a similar ilk.


Newham Dockers - Champions 2013. Rugby League For East London. 100% Cockney Rugby League!

Twitter: @NewhamDockersRL - Get following!

www.newhamdockers.co.uk


#6 Futtocks

Futtocks
  • Coach
  • 21,040 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:22 PM

"The average Rugby League supporter is a male three years younger (than the average RU supporter), but with a similar purchasing ability." Interesting, and not something that I think many potential sponsors would realise.

Edited by Futtocks, 20 June 2013 - 12:23 PM.

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn’t work if it isn’t open. Frank Zappa (1940 - 1993)


#7 boxhead

boxhead
  • Coach
  • 3,118 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:28 PM

For any Sponsorship deal to work out it needs to be a partnership where each party gets something from the deal.

There seems to be an inability to sell the game as an asset to potential sponsors.



#8 Pen-Y-Bont Crusader

Pen-Y-Bont Crusader
  • Coach
  • 603 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:31 PM

For any Sponsorship deal to work out it needs to be a partnership where each party gets something from the deal.

There seems to be an inability to sell the game as an asset to potential sponsors.

 

Too much take and not enough give ?



#9 boxhead

boxhead
  • Coach
  • 3,118 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:38 PM

Too much take and not enough give ?

I would say that but I think its the other way around.

The last deal with a few random players on a dozen trucks seemed like the RFL was rolled badly.

What did it do for the game? NOTHING.


Edited by AndyCapp, 20 June 2013 - 12:39 PM.


#10 amh

amh
  • Moderator
  • 11,085 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 12:39 PM

We have representatives from the RFL and RLWC2013 at the ESS2013 and John Dutton  (RLWC) is speaking this afternoon 

 

Some of the quotes I've picked up on so far this morning

 

"Pink: 'to expand the game in Europe we had to break down the perception of cricket as a white middle class English game' "

 

Helen Day from the European Sponsorship Association :'sponsorship has moved on from being a patronage to a commercial arrangement'

93% of all worldwide sponsorship is in sport. Understandably clothing firms account for the biggest share'

 

FACT - Sport is a good investment for govt "@jamesallenSE4: RWC2015 to generate economic impact of £2.1bn to the uk.

 

Moreton: 'Our greatest strength in bidding for events is UK spectator culture. UK events have soul'

 

Coward: 'Policy makers didn't get that sports generated big money through IP- and that needs to be protected. Piracy is stealing'

 

SCRUM - the key principles to make sure Rugby World Cup 2015 is a success #ESS2013 pic.twitter.com/UcuA2FFp3d


Whilst I do not suffer fools gladly, I will always gladly make fools suffer

A man is getting along on the road of wisdom when he realises that his opinion is just an opinion


#11 brooza

brooza
  • Moderator
  • 4,431 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:06 PM

I've always thought the RFL look at what money can be made out of a sponsor, rather than what other values a sponsor with a household name could bring to the game. ie they'd rather take £100 from "Colin's Carpets" than £50 from "Sony". Even though partnerships with major brands, someone like a 'Sony", could put the game in a much more positive light than if it had gone with Colin and his carpets and therefore appear more attractive to other sponsors of a similar ilk.

Like when they took the Betfair money instead of the partnership with Stobart?


St Albans Centurions 1st Team Manager. Former Medway Dragons Wheelchair RL player.

Leeds Rhinos, St Albans Centurions y Griffons Madrid fan. Also follow (to a lesser extent) Catalans Dragons, London Broncos, South Sydney Rabbitohs, Jacksonville Axemen, Vrchlabi Mad Squirrels, København Black Swans, Red Star Belgrade and North Hertfordshire Crusaders.

Moderator of the International board

#12 brooza

brooza
  • Moderator
  • 4,431 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:07 PM

I would say that but I think its the other way around.

The last deal with a few random players on a dozen trucks seemed like the RFL was rolled badly.

What did it do for the game? NOTHING.

Where's your proof that it did nothing for the game?


St Albans Centurions 1st Team Manager. Former Medway Dragons Wheelchair RL player.

Leeds Rhinos, St Albans Centurions y Griffons Madrid fan. Also follow (to a lesser extent) Catalans Dragons, London Broncos, South Sydney Rabbitohs, Jacksonville Axemen, Vrchlabi Mad Squirrels, København Black Swans, Red Star Belgrade and North Hertfordshire Crusaders.

Moderator of the International board

#13 Futtocks

Futtocks
  • Coach
  • 21,040 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:08 PM


Where's your proof that it did nothing for the game?


Use of CAPITALS. ;)

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn’t work if it isn’t open. Frank Zappa (1940 - 1993)


#14 brooza

brooza
  • Moderator
  • 4,431 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:09 PM

Use of CAPITALS. ;)

Ah, the Canetman methodology!


St Albans Centurions 1st Team Manager. Former Medway Dragons Wheelchair RL player.

Leeds Rhinos, St Albans Centurions y Griffons Madrid fan. Also follow (to a lesser extent) Catalans Dragons, London Broncos, South Sydney Rabbitohs, Jacksonville Axemen, Vrchlabi Mad Squirrels, København Black Swans, Red Star Belgrade and North Hertfordshire Crusaders.

Moderator of the International board

#15 Scubby

Scubby
  • Coach
  • 3,989 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:29 PM

For any Sponsorship deal to work out it needs to be a partnership where each party gets something from the deal.

There seems to be an inability to sell the game as an asset to potential sponsors.

 

This is exactly right. Sponsors in the past have seemed almost apologetic when they get involved. What could Gillette or Tetleys or JJB have actually got back if they had put some effort in? Northern Ford (not just Ford but the M62 bit) is an example of the apathy. It is as if it is just too much effort to put the brand behind it as we will get it on the cheap anyway without lifting a finger.



#16 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 15,250 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:32 PM

We have employed all sorts of people from outside of the game yet our fortunes don't change massively.

 

People can talk all they want about customer profiles etc. but there is more to sport sponsorship than this. Prestige is a hard to measure thing.

 

Our Commercial Manager previously worked with Man City IIRC and was involved in major deals with the likes of Etihad - why isn't he just finding it easy to go out and get sponsors in?

 

IMG are selling the rights to the WC - again, whay aren't the broadcasters flocking to them?

 

People need to understand that Rugby League officials are often fighting an uphill battle. Journo's, fans and club officials don't help in the slightest.



#17 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 15,250 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:35 PM

This is exactly right. Sponsors in the past have seemed almost apologetic when they get involved. What could Gillette or Tetleys or JJB have actually got back if they had put some effort in? Northern Ford (not just Ford but the M62 bit) is an example of the apathy. It is as if it is just too much effort to put the brand behind it as we will get it on the cheap anyway without lifting a finger.

 

 I'm not sure that's fair.

 

We see and have seen all sorts of promotions from companies like Gillette, engage, Heinz, Irn Bru, Tetleys that are similar to those other sports get - apart from one big difference - pretty much all our additional branding/activity/promotions are regional in the North of England. Maybe that suits some people, but imho it is massively holding us back.

 

Why would Heinz want a stand dedicated to Sam Tomkins in a Supermarket in Norwich?



#18 Scubby

Scubby
  • Coach
  • 3,989 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:42 PM

 I'm not sure that's fair.

 

We see and have seen all sorts of promotions from companies like Gillette, engage, Heinz, Irn Bru, Tetleys that are similar to those other sports get - apart from one big difference - pretty much all our additional branding/activity/promotions are regional in the North of England. Maybe that suits some people, but imho it is massively holding us back.

 

Why would Heinz want a stand dedicated to Sam Tomkins in a Supermarket in Norwich?

 

Why wouldn't they if they had a breakdown of what percentage of Sky viewers do not live on the M62? It is holding us back I agree.



#19 Dave T

Dave T
  • Coach
  • 15,250 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 01:46 PM

Why wouldn't they if they had a breakdown of what percentage of Sky viewers do not live on the M62? It is holding us back I agree.

 Because ultimately even if 50% of the viewers are outside of the North, that is still only around 100k people.



#20 Scubby

Scubby
  • Coach
  • 3,989 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 02:06 PM

 Because ultimately even if 50% of the viewers are outside of the North, that is still only around 100k people.

 

Or half a million on the BBC. I bet if you showed a picture of Sam Tomkins in a Wigan shirt with a ball to 100 people in Norwich - hardly any would recognise him - fair enough. However, people would know it was a rugby player and quite a few would have heard of Wigan. It takes effort both ways and if sponsors have not got any faith in the brand outside of the M62 then we will always get offered peanuts.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users