Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Another moron opens a car door without looking..


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 13,087 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 11:25 AM

Could easily have been a fatality and very nearly was.

 

http://www.liveleak....=85d_1371847871

 

There needs to be a law brought in specifically for this, I reckon. 

 

Summat needs doing to wake these cretins up.

 

 


Untitled_zpsd0bda754.jpg

 

 

 

_60052630_bentham.jpg    "Forward pass, head and feed to New Zealand.....What's that Mr Sutton?, no we can't go to the f***ing video ref!"


#2 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 17,056 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 11:42 AM

If you make the assumption that the cars are all going about 30mph, as it looks like they're not going that slowly, then the bike is going a good bit faster.  The car door opener has a serious part to play in this but then you have to look at the bike's speed before the full condemnation goes to the car driver.  If the rider had been going at the speed of traffic then he'd probably have had enough time to stop or avoid it.  This was a massive part of my motorbike training in the army, defensive riding all the time and if you don't then don't blame anyone else if you get flattened.

 

There are far too many car drivers who just have no clue how to work with motorbikes, and normal bikes come to that, and I agree that there needs to be some recognition of the number of riders killed or injured by idiot drivers but then they lose sympathy when they break the law themselves.  I saw one incident in London last year when a bike was flattened, rider was uninjured, by a bus because the cyclist went through a red light; the cyclist was ranting at the bus driver and called the police shouting at them to arrest the bus driver for trying to kill him.  A few of us hung around waiting for the police to arrive and let them know who really was at fault.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#3 Severus

Severus
  • Coach
  • 13,267 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 11:55 AM

Never underestimate the stupidity if drivers. I see things that would make you cringe on a daily basis. It's not that they are malicious, just incompetent.
Fides invicta triumphat

#4 tonyXIII

tonyXIII
  • Coach
  • 5,044 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 12:02 PM

Why was the biker overtaking on the inside? Sure the guy who opened the door was wrong not to look, but the biker was at least a bit stupid to drive into a narrow gap between vehicles, leaving himself no room for manoeuvre (sp?). Like ckn says, "defensive riding" is the only way to stay healthy on a bike.


Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.


#5 Severus

Severus
  • Coach
  • 13,267 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 12:25 PM

Why was the biker overtaking on the inside? Sure the guy who opened the door was wrong not to look, but the biker was at least a bit stupid to drive into a narrow gap between vehicles, leaving himself no room for manoeuvre (sp?). Like ckn says, "defensive riding" is the only way to stay healthy on a bike.

Absolutely. Riding in the 'door zone' is asking for trouble but sometimes unavoidable. For a motorcyclist it is easy to 'take the lane' and ride defensively, when I do it on my push bike it tend to get abuse and some drivers use their vehicles in an aggressive to intimidate me.

Edited by Severus, 22 June 2013 - 12:26 PM.

Fides invicta triumphat

#6 Phil

Phil
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 12:49 PM

If you make the assumption that the cars are all going about 30mph, as it looks like they're not going that slowly, then the bike is going a good bit faster.  The car door opener has a serious part to play in this but then you have to look at the bike's speed before the full condemnation goes to the car driver.  If the rider had been going at the speed of traffic then he'd probably have had enough time to stop or avoid it.  This was a massive part of my motorbike training in the army, defensive riding all the time and if you don't then don't blame anyone else if you get flattened.

 

There are far too many car drivers who just have no clue how to work with motorbikes, and normal bikes come to that, and I agree that there needs to be some recognition of the number of riders killed or injured by idiot drivers but then they lose sympathy when they break the law themselves.  I saw one incident in London last year when a bike was flattened, rider was uninjured, by a bus because the cyclist went through a red light; the cyclist was ranting at the bus driver and called the police shouting at them to arrest the bus driver for trying to kill him.  A few of us hung around waiting for the police to arrive and let them know who really was at fault.

 

 

Wow did it really take that long for someone to start blaming the cyclists?


"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

#7 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 17,056 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 01:14 PM

Wow did it really take that long for someone to start blaming the cyclists?

Not at all.  If the cyclist is not at fault then he'll get my support, especially over utter stupidity such as a driver opening a door without looking but if he's breaking the law or the Highway Code then he loses sympathy.  If he's overtaking on the inside, speeding (most likely) and on a congested street with parking like that then he gets almost none at all.

Said as someone who has held a motorcycle license since 1990 and has been knocked off my bike twice by idiots who haven't seen me on a roundabout, never mind the countless other times when only my defensive riding saved me from a driver who just didn't see me.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#8 Gary Coyle

Gary Coyle
  • Coach
  • 7,217 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 01:23 PM

Biker was speeding and undertaking, deserves what he got.



#9 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,374 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 01:24 PM

Wow did it really take that long for someone to start blaming the cyclists?

It is vital that every story where a motorist is proven to be at fault, as they are in the overwhelming majority of incidents involving themselves and other road users, that anecdotal stories are provided straight away as a balance.

It's a law of the internet.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#10 Severus

Severus
  • Coach
  • 13,267 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 03:13 PM

Not at all. If the cyclist is not at fault then he'll get my support, especially over utter stupidity such as a driver opening a door without looking but if he's breaking the law or the Highway Code then he loses sympathy. If he's overtaking on the inside, speeding (most likely) and on a congested street with parking like that then he gets almost none at all.
Said as someone who has held a motorcycle license since 1990 and has been knocked off my bike twice by idiots who haven't seen me on a roundabout, never mind the countless other times when only my defensive riding saved me from a driver who just didn't see me.

I overtake in the inside because that is where the cycle lane is. Unfortunately it is also where people open their car doors and park their cars.
Fides invicta triumphat

#11 Ullman

Ullman
  • Coach
  • 7,569 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 03:13 PM

Could easily have been a fatality and very nearly was.

 

http://www.liveleak....=85d_1371847871

 

There needs to be a law brought in specifically for this, I reckon. 

 

Summat needs doing to wake these cretins up.

There already is in the UK, mate. It's an offence to open a car door in a manner that endangers another road user. It's an offence even if there's no collision.

 

However, I would imagine convictions are like rocking horse poo.


"I own up. I am a serial risk taker. I live in a flood zone, cycle without a helmet, drink alcohol and on Sunday I had bacon for breakfast."


#12 Ullman

Ullman
  • Coach
  • 7,569 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 03:14 PM

Biker was speeding and undertaking, deserves what he got.

Another road user's stupidity is no justification for committing a traffic offence.


"I own up. I am a serial risk taker. I live in a flood zone, cycle without a helmet, drink alcohol and on Sunday I had bacon for breakfast."


#13 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 17,056 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 03:19 PM

I overtake in the inside because that is where the cycle lane is. Unfortunately it is also where people open their car doors and park their cars.

If you're in a cycling lane and someone opens the door on you then I think the law should allow you to shut it again with their head in it.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#14 gazza77

gazza77
  • Coach
  • 2,231 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 04:38 PM

Wow did it really take that long for someone to start blaming the cyclists?

As a biker myself, I'd say the person opening the door was at fault for the incident. The biker didn't however leave himself any margin to manouvre however, due to his positioning and speed. As CKN says, if he'd have ridden more defensively, he may have avoided the incident. Personally, I'd rather have been going slower and further away from the parked cars, in case someone did precisely that. Rule number one for me, always ride as if everyone is out to get you. :ph34r: :lol:


Please view my photos.

 

http://www.hughesphoto.co.uk/

 

Little Nook Farm - Caravan Club Certificated Location in the heart of the Pennines overlooking Hebden Bridge and the Calder Valley.

http://www.facebook.com/LittleNookFarm


#15 Bostik Bailey

Bostik Bailey
  • Coach
  • 1,691 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 05:46 PM

Could easily have been a fatality and very nearly was.
 
http://www.liveleak....=85d_1371847871
 
There needs to be a law brought in specifically for this, I reckon. 
 
Summat needs doing to wake these cretins up.


Do you mean the cretin who was undertaking, past a line of traffic that was not going fast enough for them.

Yes I agree however this particular cretin very nearly didn't wake up

#16 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,374 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:11 PM

Do you mean the cretin who was undertaking, past a line of traffic that was not going fast enough for them.

Yes I agree however this particular cretin very nearly didn't wake up

We've already established we're talking about the braindead lump of humanity who opens their door without looking onto a road.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#17 Bostik Bailey

Bostik Bailey
  • Coach
  • 1,691 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:29 PM

We've already established we're talking about the braindead lump of humanity who opens their door without looking onto a road.


What about the brain dead lump of humanity who thought that they were far more important than the other people in the line of traffic and decided to undertake ( also illegal) at speed,just so they could get a few cars lengths ahead.

I love it when they quote smidsy well if you weren't approaching Mach 3 then maybe people would have a chance of seeing you coming

#18 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 13,087 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:37 PM

For all you lot trying to put up some sort of defence for the car door opener, using the bike's speed in your justification, what if it had been a paramedic on a motorbike speeding to an accident?

 

They cut up the inside and use any means available to overtake traffic.

 

Anyway, I'm not sure the bike was travelling all that fast, had he been doing around 40, as has been implied, he would have ended up cartwheeling down the road.


Untitled_zpsd0bda754.jpg

 

 

 

_60052630_bentham.jpg    "Forward pass, head and feed to New Zealand.....What's that Mr Sutton?, no we can't go to the f***ing video ref!"


#19 Bostik Bailey

Bostik Bailey
  • Coach
  • 1,691 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:45 PM

For all you lot trying to put up some sort of defence for the car door opener, using the bike's speed in your justification, what if it had been a paramedic on a motorbike speeding to an accident?

They cut up the inside and use any means available to overtake traffic.

Anyway, I'm not sure the bike was travelling all that fast, had he been doing around 40, as has been implied, he would have ended up cartwheeling down the road.


Emergency vehicles have a loud siren and flashing blue light to warn other road users that they are approaching.

Do you really think that the riders behaviour did not contribute to this collision.

#20 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 13,087 posts

Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:58 PM

Emergency vehicles have a loud siren and flashing blue light to warn other road users that they are approaching.

Do you really think that the riders behaviour did not contribute to this collision.

They do indeed but I feel motorbikes are loud enough as it is, for the door opener not to hear one approaching suggests they would still have done the same regardless.

 

I think the rider's behaviour contributed to this collision, only in that he was there to be hit.

 

I cannot comprehend people defending the door opener in any circumstance. It's just laziness and a complete disregard for anybody else on the road and shows an "I can't be ar sed to wait for anybody else as I'm more important" attitude.


Untitled_zpsd0bda754.jpg

 

 

 

_60052630_bentham.jpg    "Forward pass, head and feed to New Zealand.....What's that Mr Sutton?, no we can't go to the f***ing video ref!"





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users