Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

No double dip


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 archibald

archibald
  • Coach
  • 646 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 11:12 AM

So, the ONS, who now clearly can't be trusted and are in the pay of the Bullingdon Boys (copyright Kevin McGuire), have decided there wasn't any double dip and in fact the deepest recession since Christ knows when, presided over by Brown, Balls, Miliband(s) et al was actually worse than first thought.



#2 T-Dub

T-Dub
  • Coach
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 02:49 PM

Doesnt seem to be a popular subject on here...

The ONS does what it does pretty well, independently produces statistics on a massive range of subjects, often with the caveat that they are to be reviewed when fuller data is available.

Of course, news doesnt wait, especially when its bad.

The 'double dip' became a catchy sound bite even though it was by no means clear that it happened. Today it was confirmed it didnt.

I wonder how much investment didnt happen, jobs wernt offered, money didnt get spent, how many millions of pounds worth of economic activity didnt happen etc by a public and business comunity all scared to death of the stupid expression 'double dip recession'

#3 Marauder

Marauder
  • Coach
  • 11,686 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 02:55 PM

Doesnt seem to be a popular subject on here...

The ONS does what it does pretty well, independently produces statistics on a massive range of subjects, often with the caveat that they are to be reviewed when fuller data is available.

Of course, news doesnt wait, especially when its bad.

The 'double dip' became a catchy sound bite even though it was by no means clear that it happened. Today it was confirmed it didnt.

I wonder how much investment didnt happen, jobs wernt offered, money didnt get spent, how many millions of pounds worth of economic activity didnt happen etc by a public and business comunity all scared to death of the stupid expression 'double dip recession'

Good shout


Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.



http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/

#4 hindle xiii

hindle xiii
  • Coach
  • 20,982 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 03:18 PM

 Yay! Everything's fine then.

 

  :danced: :dancer:  :locomotive:  :yahoo:  :superman:  :dance:  :drinks:  :good: :friends: :party:


2826856.jpg?type=articleLandscape

 

On Odsal Top baht 'at.


#5 John Drake

John Drake
  • Admin
  • 7,416 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 03:20 PM

Doesnt seem to be a popular subject on here...

The ONS does what it does pretty well, independently produces statistics on a massive range of subjects, often with the caveat that they are to be reviewed when fuller data is available.

Of course, news doesnt wait, especially when its bad.

The 'double dip' became a catchy sound bite even though it was by no means clear that it happened. Today it was confirmed it didnt.

I wonder how much investment didnt happen, jobs wernt offered, money didnt get spent, how many millions of pounds worth of economic activity didnt happen etc by a public and business comunity all scared to death of the stupid expression 'double dip recession'

 

The 'growth' figures are still horrendous and the outlook remains bleak as hell, whether or not it was a technical double dip or not. A statistical revision of 0.1% is hardly cause for popping the champagne corks.

 

http://www.telegraph...-year-high.html


John Drake
Site Admin: TotalRL.com
TotalRL.com
Email: john.drake@totalrl.com


#6 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 19,654 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:19 PM

Real household incomes have fallen by 1.7%  which to be honest does not seem to be very much.  Sure, costs are increasing but see here: http://www.bbc.co.uk...siness-21381921

 

Mortgage rates have halved in the last ten years and this reduction is not trivial.



#7 Bleep1673

Bleep1673
  • Coach
  • 3,430 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:34 PM

I thought it was actually an Official Triple Dip?

Discuss
Swinton RLFC est 1866 - Supplying England with players when most of your clubs were in nappies

#8 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,487 posts

Posted 27 June 2013 - 07:34 PM

The 'growth' figures are still horrendous and the outlook remains bleak as hell, whether or not it was a technical double dip or not. A statistical revision of 0.1% is hardly cause for popping the champagne corks.

 

http://www.telegraph...-year-high.html

 

Despite its reputation, the Maily Telegraph does occasionally come in useful and it has proved so today. When it was announced on the BBC news that the Q1 2012 had been revised from -0.1% to zero it did occur to me that 0%, rounded to the first decimal place, covers a range of growth of GDP from -0.4999% to +0.4999.

And, as ONS chief economist, Joe Grice, confirms, GDP at the end of Q1 2012 was lower than at the end of Q4 2011 - the second consecutive quarter of negative growth - hence, albeit technically and by a tiny margin, still a technical recession.

"

"Today ONS has revised the GDP growth figure for Quarter 1 2012. In rounded percentage terms, it has gone from minus 0.1pc to zero. It is a tiny change, but there is a danger false significance will be attached to it

...

 

"In fact, the pounds million figures also published today show that GDP was lower in Q1 2012 than in the preceding quarter – negative growth – albeit by an amount, £26m, which is insignificant in an economy producing round about £1.4 trillion a year."


"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."

#9 T-Dub

T-Dub
  • Coach
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 10:35 AM

Yay! Everything's fine then.
 
  :danced: :dancer:  :locomotive:  :yahoo:  :superman:  :dance:  :drinks:  :good: :friends: :party:


Anything but. The £1.2 trillion debt, or more importantly the annual interest wasted on servicing it instead of being spent on something useful, will cast a shadow over this generation and the next. Even the Labour front bench eventually realised this week that it needs addressing by another means than simply adding to it

#10 T-Dub

T-Dub
  • Coach
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 10:37 AM

The 'growth' figures are still horrendous and the outlook remains bleak as hell, whether or not it was a technical double dip or not. A statistical revision of 0.1% is hardly cause for popping the champagne corks.
 
http://www.telegraph...-year-high.html


Agreed but a rounding error has been interpreted by the media and politicians as catstrophe and given license to use the words 'double dip recession' which have cast a shadow which has further hindered the economy from recovering

#11 T-Dub

T-Dub
  • Coach
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 10:53 AM

I thought it was actually an Official Triple Dip?

Discuss


Lets try it another way...

If Swintons last 8 results had been Lost, Lost, Won, Lost, Lost, Won, Lost, Lost then they would have had a triple dip recession

Alternatively, if all their last 8 results had all been losses they would only have had a single dip recession

Which would you prefer?

Which would sound like a news headline to a journalist who didnt quite understand point difference and win bonuses?

#12 John Drake

John Drake
  • Admin
  • 7,416 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 10:55 AM

Agreed but a rounding error has been interpreted by the media and politicians as catstrophe and given license to use the words 'double dip recession' which have cast a shadow which has further hindered the economy from recovering

 

Is a 0.1% revision any less of a catastrophe, regardless of the use of the term 'double dip'?

 

I think there are bigger forces at work hindering economic recovery than the use of mere words by the media. If only the cause were that trivial.


John Drake
Site Admin: TotalRL.com
TotalRL.com
Email: john.drake@totalrl.com


#13 archibald

archibald
  • Coach
  • 646 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 10:58 AM

 

I think there are bigger forces at work hindering economic recovery than the use of mere words by the media. If only the cause were that trivial.

Like what?



#14 John Drake

John Drake
  • Admin
  • 7,416 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:05 AM

Like what?

 

George Osborne.


John Drake
Site Admin: TotalRL.com
TotalRL.com
Email: john.drake@totalrl.com


#15 archibald

archibald
  • Coach
  • 646 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:37 AM

George Osborne.

Ah, which of his actions in particular have kept us from not actually falling into recession?

 

This is the more likely explanation, but admittedly a lot less "waaah, the Tories eat children"

 

 
European June economic confidence improves more than forecast
Economic confidence in the eurozone improved by more than economists had forecast in June, adding to indications that the 17-nation economy is beginning to recover from the longest recession since the debut of the common currency

 


Edited by archibald, 28 June 2013 - 11:44 AM.


#16 Saintslass

Saintslass
  • Coach
  • 4,199 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:45 AM

Agreed but a rounding error has been interpreted by the media and politicians as catstrophe and given license to use the words 'double dip recession' which have cast a shadow which has further hindered the economy from recovering

Totally agree.



#17 Saintslass

Saintslass
  • Coach
  • 4,199 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:46 AM

The 'growth' figures are still horrendous and the outlook remains bleak as hell, whether or not it was a technical double dip or not. A statistical revision of 0.1% is hardly cause for popping the champagne corks.

 

http://www.telegraph...-year-high.html

I don't think the outlook remains 'as bleak as hell'.  So far this year we have had consistent growth albeit on the cautious side (I'm happy with cautious growth myself, so long as it remains growth).

 

If you want 'bleak as hell' spend time in Spain, for example, where they have something like 27% unemployment and the economy hasn't been out of recession for years.


Edited by Saintslass, 28 June 2013 - 11:47 AM.


#18 archibald

archibald
  • Coach
  • 646 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:46 AM

Does Osborne have anything to do with Italy?

 

 
Debt crisis in Italy
Italy's finance ministry on Wednesday denied that the billions of euros in potential losses from operations in derivatives in the 1990s posed any risk to public finances. The country is again coming under increasing pressure in the debt crisis.

 

 
I should have posted the one about foreign investment in Germany falling from nearly £50bn to a mere £6bn in 2012.


#19 T-Dub

T-Dub
  • Coach
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 12:06 PM

If you want 'bleak as hell' spend time in Spain, for example, where they have something like 27% unemployment and the economy hasn't been out of recession for years.




Remember the UB40 song 'Ghost Town'? Anyone who thought that applicable to 80s Britain should have a look at rural inland southern Spain. I had a week there earlier this month and the place is desolate

Still, their recession hass only been one long 'single dip' so not as bad as ours, eh?

Errrmmm...

#20 T-Dub

T-Dub
  • Coach
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 28 June 2013 - 12:12 PM

Is a 0.1% revision any less of a catastrophe, regardless of the use of the term 'double dip'?
 
I think there are bigger forces at work hindering economic recovery than the use of mere words by the media. If only the cause were that trivial.


Yes it is because it promotes the headline impression of the UK is an economy in recession when it actually, by whaever margin, hasnt been. Any overseas invester looking at UK would take his investment elsewhere given the negative climate and image promoted by Labour and media doom mongers

Yes there are massive forces at work throughout the global economy and within our own but a rational sense of perspective would have been useful over the last couple of years... but that doesnt sell papers or attract whoops of support on Question Time




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users