2 x12; 3 x 8
Posted 04 July 2013 - 10:34 AM
Each division of 12 will play the other 11 teams home and away and the top division will play their Magic Weekend match. The top 8 teams in the top division will then play each other once more either at home or away giving some teams 4 home and others 4 away!!!
The second group of 8 will be made up of the teams that finished 9 - 12 in the top division and the teams that finished 1 - 4 in the second division. This group will play each other just once either home or away and again with an uneven number of home or away matches. The top four in this group of 8 will then join the top group of 8 to form the top division of 12 for the following season.
The third group of 8 will play each other just once again with an uneven number of home and away games with the bottom team being relegated in to the Championship 1 and replaced by the Champion of that league.
Apart from all the financial mismatch between clubs on £1.2 million and clubs on £180k funding I still can't work out which club would be the Champions of the second division of 12. Is it the top club after the 22 matches or is it the top club after the 7 additional games because that is obviously two different teams?
If it is the top team after 22 matches then what is the point of the other clubs playing the additional 7 games other than to decide which club is relegated, which again is an unfair system and a team that was clear bottom after 22 matches could have a good 7 additional games and someone else gets relegated!!!! Could the team that finished 5th be the Champions from playing 7 games with 4 at home and 3 away? Could the team finishing top come 5th in the middle group of 8 and win nothing?
I can see why the SL clubs are wanting this system because it is fairly certain that everything is geared up for them to maintain the status quo. I cannot see why any Championship club, even Fev, would want this system where they will not only play against 4 SL clubs but also 2 ex-SL clubs relegated to get the divisions down to 12. What exactly are the benefits for teams like us or Haven or Barrow in that third group of 8?
It seems that everyones views have been taken in to account other than the fans and I have yet to meet anyone who has a good word for this system. Paul Cullen was saying on Boots'n All last night that clubs need to be informing their fans just how they have voted and for more transparency.
I remember when .............................
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimension, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave Hadfield - Independent 25th August 1996.
Posted 04 July 2013 - 11:18 AM
Only the RFL could come up with such a stupid idea that will only benefit the elite clubs, and disregard the impact it will probably have on the others.
The worst of it is that the clubs with aspirations ( or dillusions of grandeur) from the Champ will probably vote it in too. They will then face the reality of trying to cope with playing teams with salary caps almost tenfold of their own too much to compete with and end up going into administration, the same may happen to the SL teams that don't make it to the big table and have to play Champ teams. The RFL will then point the finger at the club and blame them for getting into that financial mess.
Any bets whether we would get the 4 home or 4 away matches?
Posted 04 July 2013 - 11:44 AM
Edited by DavidM, 04 July 2013 - 11:47 AM.
Posted 04 July 2013 - 12:45 PM
no wonder the game is on its ar se
Raiders have risen from the ashes
Posted 04 July 2013 - 01:59 PM
Posted 04 July 2013 - 03:33 PM
Posted 04 July 2013 - 07:11 PM