Jump to content


Rugby League World - Grand Finals Issue

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD - THE GRAND FINALS ISSUE - OUT 17 OCT OR DOWNLOAD IT NOW!
Try our Fantastic 4-Issue Bundle Offer:
For just £14, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:

The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final drama from both hemispheres plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Martyn Sadler - Take a bow


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
76 replies to this topic

#1 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 1,023 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 12:53 PM

Great article in this months RL World and it's refreshing to see/hear common sense with regards to the direction the RFL is taking the sport in. 

 

As you've said the club game can only take RL forward so much and trying to split the SL pie further and reintroducing P & R is just self destruction. We need to develop the international game and bring in sponsorship through the trickle down effect as is the case with Union and Cricket. 

Cricket gets terrible county attendances but sponsorship is vibrant due to a vibrant international scene.

 

In any case great journalism Martyn and agree with all you've had to say regarding the RFL proposals.



#2 Terry Mullaney

Terry Mullaney
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:16 PM

So

Great article in this months RL World and it's refreshing to see/hear common sense with regards to the direction the RFL is taking the sport in. 
 
As you've said the club game can only take RL forward so much and trying to split the SL pie further and reintroducing P & R is just self destruction. We need to develop the international game and bring in sponsorship through the trickle down effect as is the case with Union and Cricket. 
Cricket gets terrible county attendances but sponsorship is vibrant due to a vibrant international scene.
 
In any case great journalism Martyn and agree with all you've had to say regarding the RFL proposals.

So why have the SL clubs instigated these possible changes if its so easy to attract the necessary level of sponsorship under the present system? Doesn't make sense
Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request

http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/

#3 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 1,023 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:20 PM

So So why have the SL clubs instigated these possible changes if its so easy to attract the necessary level of sponsorship under the present system? Doesn't make sense

 

Huh?



#4 a.n Other

a.n Other
  • Coach
  • 1,548 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:21 PM

Great article in this months RL World and it's refreshing to see/hear common sense with regards to the direction the RFL is taking the sport in.

As you've said the club game can only take RL forward so much and trying to split the SL pie further and reintroducing P & R is just self destruction. We need to develop the international game and bring in sponsorship through the trickle down effect as is the case with Union and Cricket.
Cricket gets terrible county attendances but sponsorship is vibrant due to a vibrant international scene.

In any case great journalism Martyn and agree with all you've had to say regarding the RFL proposals.

He is a Wakefield fan if I am not mistaken. So as per Mysterious has asked and stated on other posts, he may be looking after his own clubs self interests with his articles and posts as they may be one of the clubs affected.

#5 Terry Mullaney

Terry Mullaney
  • Coach
  • 1,991 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:36 PM

Huh?


How can we emulate Cricket's sponsorship performance when we don't have the vibrant international scene that cricket, RU and football have. The RFL are striving to introduce more vibrancy into the sport with the changes they are likely to introduce. If they're successful then maybe sponsors will be more likely to support an exciting and intense competition rather than the sterile one which licensing has produced. Hope that makes things a little clearer for you

Edited by Terry Mullaney, 05 July 2013 - 01:39 PM.

Wedding Films For The Discerning by Picture House
Free Showreel DVD On Request

http://www.pictureho...ingfilms.co.uk/

#6 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 1,023 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:40 PM

How can we emulate Cricket's sponsorship performance when we don't have the vibrant international scene that it has. The RFL are striving to introduce vibrancy into the sport with the changes they are likely to introduce. If they're successful then maybe sponsors will be more likely to support an exciting and intense competition rather than the sterile one which licensing has produced.


I see your point, but we've got to build it brick by brick and close the gap between teams.

#7 Doghead

Doghead
  • Coach
  • 1,049 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:43 PM

International Rugby League beside being the pinnacle of the game, must be the main priority over the coming years, the NRL have thrown ESL a lifeline with all our home grown players they are signing, lets not miss this chance.

#8 Larry the Leit

Larry the Leit
  • Coach
  • 3,040 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 01:54 PM

He is a Wakefield fan if I am not mistaken. So as per Mysterious has asked and stated on other posts, he may be looking after his own clubs self interests with his articles and posts as they may be one of the clubs affected.


Sorry but when Martyn writes it certainly isn't with red white and blue glasses on. He has been consistently neutral and/or harsh over decades regarding Trinity, and is not generally liked by our fans as a result.
The Unicorn is not a Goose,

#9 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 41,535 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 03:10 PM

So So why have the SL clubs instigated these possible changes if its so easy to attract the necessary level of sponsorship under the present system? Doesn't make sense

they haven't


WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#10 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 41,535 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 03:14 PM

He is a Wakefield fan if I am not mistaken. So as per Mysterious has asked and stated on other posts, he may be looking after his own clubs self interests with his articles and posts as they may be one of the clubs affected.

I argue like cat and dog with Sadler about all sorts

but the idea that he pushes his own club's agenda in his publishing is the lowest of the low.


Edited by l'angelo mysterioso, 05 July 2013 - 03:14 PM.

WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#11 Bedford Roughyed

Bedford Roughyed
  • Moderator
  • 5,361 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 03:22 PM

We know it's right.  We get more coverage, TV, Radio, print during the 4 nations than we do for most of the season.  When we get in a final, we have actually led the sports news.  Internationals matter to the press. 


With the best, thats a good bit of PR, though I would say the Bedford team, theres, like, you know, 13 blokes who can get together at the weekend to have a game together, which doesnt point to expansion of the game. Point, yeah go on!

#12 Bostik Bailey

Bostik Bailey
  • Coach
  • 1,690 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 04:07 PM

Cricket has P and R

#13 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 41,535 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 04:25 PM

Cricket has P and R

what are attendances like?

 

must be in the high dozens

 

the other forms of cricket that are played subsidise it.


WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#14 jpmc

jpmc
  • Coach
  • 517 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 04:57 PM

So So why have the SL clubs instigated these possible changes if its so easy to attract the necessary level of sponsorship under the present system? Doesn't make sense


Some people can't see beyond the end of there noses.
SL,licencing has failed.
London,Salford,wakefield hkr,cas bradford,all failed or failing and will continue to do so.
Why should sky/rfl or sponsors of the sport has a whole continue to prop these clubs up.
Its well over due that these clubs were made to stand on ther own two feet instead of continually leaching a living of others

#15 thirteenthman

thirteenthman
  • Coach
  • 2,673 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 05:00 PM

We know it's right.  We get more coverage, TV, Radio, print during the 4 nations than we do for most of the season.  When we get in a final, we have actually led the sports news.  Internationals matter to the press. 

 

You're absolutely spot on, but unfortunately the club game always comes first. It's why the whole direction of the sport is constantly being altered - to suit the clubs. It's why we'll never see a mid season test series like Mr Sadler suggests in RLW - purely down to self interest from the clubs. The only way a gap in the season would be created is if it was for an extended WCC, which benefits the clubs, and even that looks like it'll be knocked back due to the clubs down under not being interested - again, more self interest. And as we don't have a proper world governing body, it won't change anytime soon. Instead we have basically 2 bodies running the sport, both acting primarily in the interests of the clubs.

 

Of course, you could argue that one of our problems is that internationals don't appear to matter to a lot of the fans. The biggest crowd we get most years is for a club match.



#16 South Wakefield Sharks

South Wakefield Sharks
  • Coach
  • 2,213 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 05:37 PM

This is actually a good piece by Martyn. Most of what he writes is tosh as far as I'm concerned. Moans and no solutions. This seems to be a very sensible solution.

 

I think if the Aussies went for it, I don't think it would be hard to persuade our clubs to support it. If what he says is true about NRL interest dropping during Origin, then it would seem to be in the interests of the Aussies too.

 

Not sure, how you'd deal with the international squads. Would they be together for the whole 3 weeks and then return to their club sides after the third mid week international, or would they be available for their club sides each weekend?

 

If the former, then that is at least 250 players taken out of the club scene for a whole 3 week period. If the latter, then you'd only be losing the players for the "touring" country (ie alternately England or NZ).

 

Decent idea though, worth pursuing, but unless the Aussies were interested in bringing Origin back to back, then there's not much the rest of us can do about it.



#17 goldcoaster

goldcoaster
  • Coach
  • 2,750 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 06:11 PM

Good to see some sensible opinions coming to the fore. The 'Bring back P&R' brigade have had too much air recently. Any sensible person knows bringing back P&R would be the death of the game over here.
Posted Image

Posted Image

#18 Bostik Bailey

Bostik Bailey
  • Coach
  • 1,690 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 06:48 PM

what are attendances like?

must be in the high dozens

the other forms of cricket that are played subsidise it.


High dozens! I think you have the union calculator out

#19 The Daddy_merged

The Daddy_merged
  • Coach
  • 1,023 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 07:11 PM

Good to see some sensible opinions coming to the fore. The 'Bring back P&R' brigade have had too much air recently. Any sensible person knows bringing back P&R would be the death of the game over here.


One of the arguments they use is....."P & R is a part of british sporting tradition", ......So is losing.

#20 bewareshadows

bewareshadows
  • Coach
  • 1,084 posts

Posted 05 July 2013 - 07:41 PM

Surely the issue with the international game, is that all the money is in the club game.

 

The NRL holds most of the cash, so internationals are a hindrance to this cash flow.


Super League the only place in the world where people still believe that less competitors and a closed market to new competition will improve the quality of the product.

Even the Chinese and the Cubans gave up on these marxist principles years ago.


SL with a reduced number of competitors and a closed market = North Korea.