Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

forward passes going to video ref


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#21 Larry the Leit

Larry the Leit
  • Coach
  • 2,275 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 08:03 AM

Is John Senior still of this parish? I'd love to read his views.

I'm not sure we can get it any better with TV than we do with the refs on forward passes.

Edited by Larry the Leit, 08 July 2013 - 08:04 AM.


#22 Duff Duff

Duff Duff
  • Banned
  • 717 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 09:22 AM

The Union law is that unless the video ref is 100% sure it is a forward pass and then the try should stand. The benefit of the doubt is with the attacking side and and referees original decision.

#23 Celtic Rooster

Celtic Rooster
  • Coach
  • 1,636 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 09:40 AM

Forward passing is allowed in Super League.

#24 Maximus Decimus

Maximus Decimus
  • Coach
  • 7,677 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 03:07 PM

The problem with the Union law is that it would cause more unnecessary controversy in the game. Firstly, we'd see a lot more decisions being referred upstairs and their being watched over and over again. The fact that they have to be certain and the difficulty in judging forward passes would result in a lot of controversial decisions. For instance, we would have blatant forward passes let go because they weren't 100% certain. This for me would be worse and more frustrating than a referee missing it during the game.



#25 thirteenthman

thirteenthman
  • Coach
  • 2,612 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 03:27 PM

 if the video ref cannot make a decision it becomes ref's call which I believe happens in the NRL.....

 

The NRL got rid of Refs Call. Now when a ref goes to the video ref, they have to make a call on whether they believe it was a try or not. Basically, the video ref then has find evidence to either agree or disagree. If, for example, the referee thought it was no try, then the video ref would have to find conclusive evidence in the replays to give a try. If no evidence is found, the try is disallowed.

 

There have been a couple of instances where a try could potentially have been allowed because the on field ref called it as no try but the video evidence was inconclusive. The video ref would have no evidence to disagree with the on field refs original call no matter which way the ref called it. Most times it seems to work though.



#26 madwire

madwire
  • Players
  • 18 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 04:17 PM

If forward passes were to go to the screen in rugby league Leeds will be f****d.

#27 terrywebbisgod

terrywebbisgod
  • Coach
  • 8,061 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:06 PM

If forward passes were to go to the screen in rugby league Leeds will be f****d.

We have a winner,surprised it took so long :sclerosis:


Founder of the convent pontoon team.

#28 Southerner

Southerner
  • Coach
  • 911 posts

Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:30 PM

No more video ref please. I don't know the facts but I bet there's an average of 4 referrals per game wasting about 2 minutes each. That's 8 mins of the most boring negative reruns with Eddie and Stevo arguing over the rules and sounding like a right pair of old farts. Hate video ref.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users