I was just reading the league Weekly report of the match, and noticed amongst other things (Liam W being described as Alex W etc) that Walton received a 7 whilst every other Batley player received an 8 or above.
Now I was there, and other than one knock on in the second half, I didn't think Walton was our worst player at all. He did so much hard work and made the hard yards. I am mystified why this should be the case. The lowest score on the Leigh side was also 7. I do not think that Walton was as bad as Maden or Higson for example.
I really do wonder where these ratings come from!