the RFL has done more than any other governing body to grow the game internationally!! especially since setting up & funding the RLEF since 2003....
So going back to my point, you think that the RFL has no obligation to grow the game internationally? and you dont think the game will struggle for improved public perception, increased revenue oppurtunities and will have a multitude of nations to play against at the highest level.
SO what if the RLC and NZRL take the same attitude towards the English? you think the game will prosper? what about if they neglected the Islands, said no to hosting the Tonga v Samoa game, you think thats the way to go?
Mate, you need to drop that chip off your shoulder, I don't care what you have fought for, I really don't, but saying that a governing body has no obligation to grow the game and create interest further afield is quite frankly idiotic.
as for what the RLC & NZRL have done...hahaha you clueless prat! anyone with any idea about international RL knows the aussies & kiwis have done little to nothing in terms of developing international RL in the pacific....i point you to the fact you can count the number of tests the pacific island nations have played since the world cup on your FINGERS!!! where as the celtic nations & france,led by the RLEF & RFL,have played close to 60 tests!!!!
so when you know what you are talking about come back with a better argument pal!
Edited by roughyedspud, 20 September 2013 - 11:39 PM.