Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Royal Mail privatisation


  • Please log in to reply
130 replies to this topic

Poll: Are you in favour of Royal Mail privatisation? (28 member(s) have cast votes)

Are you in favour of Royal Mail privatisation?

  1. Yes (5 votes [17.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.86%

  2. No (23 votes [82.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 82.14%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#121 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 14,907 posts

Posted 03 April 2014 - 08:57 PM

How where they going to value it would they seek the advise of the shysters that would then go on to buy big stakes?

 

Or was it just going to be "better" because it was being done by a Labour government?

It wasn't going to be done by a Labour government at all, to quote from the 2010 manifesto "continuing modernisation and investment will be needed by the Royal Mail in the public sector"


"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#122 Garvers

Garvers
  • Coach
  • 484 posts

Posted 03 April 2014 - 10:29 PM

Andrew Neil (supported by BBC research dpt. :rolleyes:) confirmed it had never been a Labour manifesto pledge. 

 

Genuine question - just wondered what you meant about the BBC political research unit..?



#123 shrek

shrek
  • Coach
  • 5,833 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 07:20 AM

It wasn't going to be done by a Labour government at all, to quote from the 2010 manifesto "continuing modernisation and investment will be needed by the Royal Mail in the public sector"

I didn't make any reference to the 2010 manifesto.

 

I'm actually reffering to the 2009 botched "part privatisation" attempt by Gordon and Mandy.



#124 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 14,907 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 07:33 AM

I didn't make any reference to the 2010 manifesto.

 

I'm actually reffering to the 2009 botched "part privatisation" attempt by Gordon and Mandy.

But what happened in 2009 doesn't commit the party now to anything, what it promised to do in 2010 doesn't commit them either today but at least is relevant. But Cameron told a lie in Parliament when he said Labour would have privatised the Royal Mail.  Admit it.  They've got form both for lying and selling off state assets to their pals at "mates rates"  That's what the Tories do.


"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#125 shrek

shrek
  • Coach
  • 5,833 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 07:44 AM

But what happened in 2009 doesn't commit the party now to anything, what it promised to do in 2010 doesn't commit them either today but at least is relevant. But Cameron told a lie in Parliament when he said Labour would have privatised the Royal Mail.  Admit it.  They've got form both for lying and selling off state assets to their pals at "mates rates"  That's what the Tories do.

I never said they were committed to anything.

 

I only made reference to the last Labour government, there hasn't been an opportunity for a Labour government to implement the contents of the 2010 manifesto, I'm fully aware of this not sure why your linking my reference to the previous Labour government to Camerons cock up on Wednesday which was clear for all to see.



#126 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 16,549 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 07:57 AM

I never said they were committed to anything.

 

I only made reference to the last Labour government, there hasn't been an opportunity for a Labour government to implement the contents of the 2010 manifesto, I'm fully aware of this not sure why your linking my reference to the previous Labour government to Camerons cock up on Wednesday which was clear for all to see.

Even then, they lost the election.  Political practice is that the manifesto is only usable as budgie tray liner once an election is lost.  Even the two parties in government abandoned parts of their manifestos when they didn't win outright and had to sign up to a Coalition Agreement.  Once they signed that though it was a vastly different story as it was no longer a sales document to convince you to vote for them, it was an actual statement of government intentions.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#127 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 14,907 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 07:59 AM

I never said they were committed to anything.

 

I only made reference to the last Labour government, there hasn't been an opportunity for a Labour government to implement the contents of the 2010 manifesto, I'm fully aware of this not sure why your linking my reference to the previous Labour government to Camerons cock up on Wednesday which was clear for all to see.

It wasn't a cock up it was a lie.  He went red in the face. Cameron is a known and proven liar. He orchestrated the entire 1992 Tory election campaign, a campaign which afterwards the ever indiscrete Ken Clarke admitted on "Any Questions" was based on lies.  


"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#128 shrek

shrek
  • Coach
  • 5,833 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 08:08 AM

Even then, they lost the election.  Political practice is that the manifesto is only usable as budgie tray liner once an election is lost.  Even the two parties in government abandoned parts of their manifestos when they didn't win outright and had to sign up to a Coalition Agreement.  Once they signed that though it was a vastly different story as it was no longer a sales document to convince you to vote for them, it was an actual statement of government intentions.

 

 

It wasn't a cock up it was a lie.  He went red in the face. Cameron is a known and proven liar. He orchestrated the entire 1992 Tory election campaign, a campaign which afterwards the ever indiscrete Ken Clarke admitted on "Any Questions" was based on lies.  

Call it what you like, I don't care and in fact don't disagree. 

 

Point stands though Trojan I was clearly making reference to the last Labour Government, who couldn't find a buyer for the 30% they'd valued at £2 billion, not a none existant line in a manifesto. 



#129 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 16,549 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 08:10 AM

Call it what you like, I don't care and in fact don't disagree. 

 

Point stands though Trojan I was clearly making reference to the last Labour Government, who couldn't find a buyer for the 30% they'd valued at £2 billion, not a none existant line in a manifesto. 

If Labour could have got it through the unions then they'd have done exactly what the Tories have done.  Their other problem was that from 2007 the market was tanking with no sign of it going the other way, they'd have been easy pickings for the Tories to accuse them of selling it off cheaply.


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#130 ckn

ckn
  • Admin
  • 16,549 posts

Posted 30 April 2014 - 10:09 AM

More fun from the Royal Mail shares aftermath.

 

It is, after all, the fault of the posties...


Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway


#131 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 14,907 posts

Posted 30 April 2014 - 09:59 PM

Cameron trying to get some fun out of the great mail rip-off when the Speaker stopped him dead!

Brilliant


"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users