The prosecution are making their case at the moment. Thus the contents of the letter, which are plain enough though there seems to be no proof it was ever posted, never mind even received, will naturally be represented in a way that assists the prosecution case. It will of course be more than interesting to hear the defence case in due course.
Mind you, Mr Edis told jurors he was not revealing the affair to deliberately intrude into their privacy or to make a "moral judgment". Is personal integrity not included?
One thing, though..I bet Private Eye sales soar! This is going to run and run. To find out more about the person the left wing press, Private Eye and this forum loves to hate, see http://en.wikipedia..../Rebekah_Brooks
PS. She's from Warrington.
Edited by JohnM, 31 October 2013 - 04:33 PM.