Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Modern politicians - do they achieve power when they are too young?


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 Martyn Sadler

Martyn Sadler

    League Publications Ltd

  • Moderator
  • 2,733 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 01:24 PM

An interesting article by Peter Oborne in the Telegraph.

 

I tend to agree with him.

 

http://blogs.telegra...g-and-too-dull/



#2 Wolford6

Wolford6
  • Coach
  • 9,603 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 01:30 PM

My Mam and Dad were at school with Roy Jenkins. He wasn't popular.

 

In Pontypool, even when he was a leading politician, his own generation mostly thought he was not half the man his father was.

 

i tend to agree with them.


Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police


#3 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 28,869 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 01:36 PM

The politicians get younger, the people they look after first get older.

 

But, I tend to agree with the first comment I saw under the article.  Age isn't really the issue.  Some young people will be good at the job, some older people never will be.  The issue is the growing lack of diversity in experience, background, education and culture of most the political class.


Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#4 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 19,653 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 01:38 PM

Our MP has just decided to pack it in at the early age of 84 see http://www.bbc.co.uk...litics-26683935



#5 Phil

Phil
  • Coach
  • 1,879 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 02:29 PM

The Labour Party particularly seems to place being young and good looking and a willingness to toe the blairite line above any other considerations
"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

#6 Bob8

Bob8
  • Coach
  • 9,318 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 03:25 PM

I suspect the more politicians are born to the job, the smaller the pool and the younger they get to power.  Hence, when they came from all walks of life they tended to be older and experience was required to set you apart. 

 

When the job was the preserve of the upper classes and highest middle classes, Pitt the Younger could get the main job at 24.  Now it is coming back to a specific class and network, the age is drifting down.


"You clearly have never met Bob8 then, he's like a veritable Bryan Ferry of RL." - Johnoco 19 Jul 2014

”I am all for expansion but not to start and string the teams all over the place” – stewpot01 – 11 July 2014

"2013 is on course to be one of the most disastrous in its history." - Creditwhereitsdews - 2nd January 2013


#7 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 19,653 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 05:21 PM

The Labour Party particularly seems to place being young and good looking and a willingness to toe the blairite line above any other considerations

 

well, that will exclude Balls and Miliband on both counts, unless by Blairite you mean electoral expediency...but then again Balls and Miliband can't even do that bit right. What do these guys actually stand for and believe in?  



#8 Phil

Phil
  • Coach
  • 1,879 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 05:37 PM

well, that will exclude Balls and Miliband on both counts, unless by Blairite you mean electoral expediency...but then again Balls and Miliband can't even do that bit right. What do these guys actually stand for and believe in?


Buggered if I know!!
"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

#9 Padge

Padge
  • Coach
  • 17,937 posts

Posted 22 March 2014 - 08:26 PM

The biggest change is career politicians.

 

It is now a case of leave school , pathetic politics degree, a year as a researcher and grovel to the boss and get stuck into a safe seat.

 

As opposed to, graft your way through industry/business as boss or underling, both give a broad experience, and then fight with local rivals to prove you have the credentials.

 

Politics has become business. We are ruled by those that want to ensure that we want to keep them on the gravy train and not by those who want to get evreyone on it.



Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com
Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

 

This country's wealth was created by men in overalls, it was destroyed by men in suits.


#10 clwydianrange

clwydianrange
  • Coach
  • 118 posts

Posted 22 March 2014 - 08:37 PM

I can't think of any politicians I have any respect for at the moment except Frank Field. I believe he is there because he feels he can make a difference irrespective of which party a person supports.

#11 bearman

bearman
  • Coach
  • 2,235 posts

Posted 22 March 2014 - 08:39 PM

There's nowt new under the sun.
Pitt the Younger was 24 when he became PM.
Ron Banks
Bears and Barrow

#12 Johnoco

Johnoco
  • Coach
  • 19,624 posts

Posted 22 March 2014 - 10:33 PM

There's nowt new under the sun.
Pitt the Younger was 24 when he became PM.

But life expectancy was only 32 then, so he was actually a pensioner.

No I don't care if you're if you're into different bands

No cause for so much hatred, I'm just a different man

Pull off that cover, I will too, and learn to understand

With music deep inside we'll make world unity our plan

 

7 Seconds -Walk Together, Rock Together


#13 Padge

Padge
  • Coach
  • 17,937 posts

Posted 22 March 2014 - 11:07 PM

All political discussions should be banned from TV other than for 6 weeks before a general election..

 

If you want to hear or get involved in any political discussion you should be made to get off your arris and go and get involved.

 

Also politicians would have to stand up and be accountable face to face with their electorate.



Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com
Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

 

This country's wealth was created by men in overalls, it was destroyed by men in suits.


#14 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 14,949 posts

Posted 23 March 2014 - 09:26 AM

The biggest change is career politicians.

 

It is now a case of leave school , pathetic politics degree, a year as a researcher and grovel to the boss and get stuck into a safe seat.

 

As opposed to, graft your way through industry/business as boss or underling, both give a broad experience, and then fight with local rivals to prove you have the credentials.

 

Politics has become business. We are ruled by those that want to ensure that we want to keep them on the gravy train and not by those who want to get evreyone on it.

Wilson was young to be PM but nevertheless he was an experienced minister, as were Thatcher and Major.  Blair wasn't but then who was left that was after 18 years in opposition?  Brown certainly was experienced, much good it did him.  This lot Cameron, Osborne, IDS, etc were very inexperienced and TBH it shows.  Basically Cameron is a PR man trying to pull a big con, will it succeed or won't it, we'll know next year.  It's usually in a government's second term that we learn their true aims.  Personally I preferred it when our leaders had some background of trying to make ends meet. One of the true things Blair said was that you come into power with a large amount of popular support and make mistake after mistake, by the time you're learned how to do it you're no olnger popular.  This should have been true for Wilson, but by the time he came back in 1974 it was clear that he was losing it.


"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#15 John Drake

John Drake
  • Admin
  • 7,416 posts

Posted 23 March 2014 - 10:26 AM

I don't think age is the issue. I'd love it if Parliament had more young firebrands in there who believed in something and who wanted to change the world.

 

But what is Parliament these days? It's become an excuse-making factory for wider corporate interests. No wonder so many are disgusted or disinterested in it. The age of the people who sit inside it is irrelevant.


John Drake
Site Admin: TotalRL.com
TotalRL.com
Email: john.drake@totalrl.com


#16 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 19,653 posts

Posted 23 March 2014 - 12:49 PM

It's this sort of thing, on all sides, that  gets to me: Chuka Umunna as shadow business secretary? Uniquely qualified with his lifetime experience in running a successful business. see here: http://en.wikipedia....ki/Chuka_Umunna



#17 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 14,949 posts

Posted 23 March 2014 - 02:48 PM

It's this sort of thing, on all sides, that  gets to me: Chuka Umunna as shadow business secretary? Uniquely qualified with his lifetime experience in running a successful business. see here: http://en.wikipedia....ki/Chuka_Umunna

Cameron hadn't even run a sweetshop when he became PM.  He was only elected in 2001 to Parliament and by 2005 he was leader of the Tories. Judging by his performance so far a few years finding out what life is really like wold have done him the world of good. Any worthwhile politician would have won hands down in 2010, given an unpopular PM and a government that had run out of steam. BTW why is it John you only seem to be able to find dirt on Labour people? could it be you're not looking for it on the Tories.


"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#18 WearyRhino

WearyRhino
  • Coach
  • 3,081 posts

Posted 23 March 2014 - 03:22 PM

If Labour politicians are to be considered unsuitable for industry portfolios on the basis that they are not businessesmen (sic!), does that mean Tories are disbarred from ministerial jobs that concern human beings?

LUNEW.jpg


#19 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 19,653 posts

Posted 24 March 2014 - 10:18 AM

Cameron hadn't even run a sweetshop when he became PM.  He was only elected in 2001 to Parliament and by 2005 he was leader of the Tories. Judging by his performance so far a few years finding out what life is really like wold have done him the world of good. Any worthwhile politician would have won hands down in 2010, given an unpopular PM and a government that had run out of steam. BTW why is it John you only seem to be able to find dirt on Labour people? could it be you're not looking for it on the Tories.

 

Have a read of my post again - it's you who chose to polarise the argument: " It's this sort of thing, on all sides, that  gets to me"

 

Umunna is an excellent example of my point, but not the only one, I am sure -  and he certainly hasn't run a sweet shop..nor will he get the opportunity as I doubt he has the skills. There is nothing in his CV to suggest that he has. 



#20 JohnM

JohnM
  • Coach
  • 19,653 posts

Posted 24 March 2014 - 10:20 AM

If Labour politicians are to be considered unsuitable for industry portfolios on the basis that they are not businessesmen (sic!), does that mean Tories are disbarred from ministerial jobs that concern human beings?

 

As Dennis Healy would have said, "What a silly billy you are."  :tongue:  :tongue:






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users