They annoy me at times, but overall I don't have too much of an issue with them.
I'm not convinced anybody would be good enough for RL tbh - I liked Voss, but he still played it for laughs far too much - I prefer commentators to treat us like adults and talk about the game and throw in some stats and facts.
I think one of the slight issues with the Sky team is that as they do pretty much every game together it just comes across as a bunch of mates covering the games - tbh sometimes that works but I do understand why some people find them annoying.
What I would say is I have never heard a neutral have a major issue with them, and certainly nobody has turned off because of the commentators that I know of, it is people who know more about the game and disagree with their approach that seem to have the issues with them.
I think we should relax a little.
I think this is about right as usual Dave. Both occasionally get on my baps (especially Eddie), but that's due to familiarity as much as anything, and I'm yet to hear the RL commentator that wouldn't have the same effect on me if I heard them for 4+ hours a week, every week.
I also like Ray Warren, but agree with those who say he can be a little too passive at times, even in the face of the quality RL he commentates on each week. As for Phil Gould, he comes out with nearly as much rubbish as Stevo.