Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

11/04/14 - Wigan Warriors v London Broncos KO 8pm


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

Poll: Who will win? (6 member(s) have cast votes)

Who will win?

  1. Wigan Warriors (5 votes [83.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 83.33%

  2. Draw (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. London Broncos (1 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 16,859 posts

Posted 13 April 2014 - 07:50 AM

And as I understood it Licences could be revoked. If not, then why the angst over Bradford's first journey into administration (or was that all just to wind Bulls fans up). Licencing failed because clubs like London, Wakefield, Bradford and Salford were all allowed to either go bankrupt or decay at the foot of the table year after year without sanction. In hindsight it's hard not to disagree with Andy Wilson on backchat that London's place in Super League should have been addressed two years ago.

 

Indeed they could but not without fair and moreso equitable reason. Warning letters once went to clubs who had promised grounds to be built that still await the first sod to be turned.

 

"Either" going bankrupt or decaying? Surely the same thing, but why remove weak businesses only to replace with weaker businesses, were Sheffield ever better resourced than any of the "decayers". Did any CC club ever push for the poisoned chalice of replacing a failed SL club mid license?? The idea London may have given up leaving a spot to be filled frightened the SL wanabees into silence.

 

For me London eventually were only ever there for the player development system, something the RFL did not want to give up in return for another "ready to fail" M62 club with no development system. If a reason why licensing failed is being sought try the fact that when the clubs were applying for said licenses only four were actually up to real Superleague standard.

 

A = Superleague club(4) B=not up to scratch(5) C = ready for failure (6).

 

This has been reflected in the seasons under licensing we have had when we we see the same clubs at the top and the same at the bottom and the same jiggling around in the middle.


Edited by The Parksider, 13 April 2014 - 09:39 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users