Jump to content

Rugby League World - Grand Finals Issue

Try our Fantastic 4-Issue Bundle Offer:
For just £14, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:

The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final drama from both hemispheres plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.

League Express


- - - - -

11/04/14 - Wigan Warriors v London Broncos KO 8pm

  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

Poll: Who will win? (6 member(s) have cast votes)

Who will win?

  1. Wigan Warriors (5 votes [83.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 83.33%

  2. Draw (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. London Broncos (1 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 The Parksider

The Parksider
  • Coach
  • 17,359 posts

Posted 13 April 2014 - 07:50 AM

And as I understood it Licences could be revoked. If not, then why the angst over Bradford's first journey into administration (or was that all just to wind Bulls fans up). Licencing failed because clubs like London, Wakefield, Bradford and Salford were all allowed to either go bankrupt or decay at the foot of the table year after year without sanction. In hindsight it's hard not to disagree with Andy Wilson on backchat that London's place in Super League should have been addressed two years ago.


Indeed they could but not without fair and moreso equitable reason. Warning letters once went to clubs who had promised grounds to be built that still await the first sod to be turned.


"Either" going bankrupt or decaying? Surely the same thing, but why remove weak businesses only to replace with weaker businesses, were Sheffield ever better resourced than any of the "decayers". Did any CC club ever push for the poisoned chalice of replacing a failed SL club mid license?? The idea London may have given up leaving a spot to be filled frightened the SL wanabees into silence.


For me London eventually were only ever there for the player development system, something the RFL did not want to give up in return for another "ready to fail" M62 club with no development system. If a reason why licensing failed is being sought try the fact that when the clubs were applying for said licenses only four were actually up to real Superleague standard.


A = Superleague club(4) B=not up to scratch(5) C = ready for failure (6).


This has been reflected in the seasons under licensing we have had when we we see the same clubs at the top and the same at the bottom and the same jiggling around in the middle.

Edited by The Parksider, 13 April 2014 - 09:39 AM.