Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 401 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, full colour, in-depth coverage from the grassroots through to the international game.
Click here for the digital edition or just download the Rugby League World app from Apple Newsstand or Google Play now.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 401
/ View a Gallery of all our previous 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 401
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

RFL Community Club Registration Fees


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#41 Marauder

Marauder
  • Coach
  • 11,764 posts

Posted 08 June 2014 - 03:40 PM

Seems like more and more people are coming alive to the RFL and it's Dick Dastardly tricks these days, I remember being shouted down years ago for saying so.


Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.



http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/

#42 LordCharles

LordCharles
  • Coach
  • 706 posts

Posted 09 July 2014 - 08:54 AM

And so it begin's..............
 
Mr Gent advised that the process has started to investigate other National Governing Bodies of Sports’ membership schemes, such as British Cycling and UK athletics. The main purpose of the membership scheme is to allow members and the RFL to communicate effectively with one another. At this point, no cost implications have been explored. 
 
Mr Gent did clarify that Sport England have challenged the RFL to seek further revenue to reduce the reliance on Sport England funding, particularly for the “core costs” of the Community Game and this is being taken into consideration when researching others sports’ membership schemes. 
 
What that really means is...........
 
"We don't want to charge you all anything we were only doing this to improve communication, its Sport England that have told us we have to look at how much we can get out of you for no apparent reason!!!"
 
Oh really, can you tell us all then just how much funding is currently allocated to the running of the Community game by the RFL, what it is actually spent on and what percentage will not be there in the future and you now need to look at generating from the Community game as a consequence Mr Gent?

Edited by LordCharles, 09 July 2014 - 09:06 AM.


#43 TaxiEgg

TaxiEgg
  • Coach
  • 2,723 posts

Posted 09 July 2014 - 09:03 AM

Cost to communicate ????

Edited by TaxiEgg, 09 July 2014 - 09:04 AM.


#44 LordCharles

LordCharles
  • Coach
  • 706 posts

Posted 09 July 2014 - 10:02 AM

Cost to communicate ????

 

Communication is expensive these days Taxi Egg............have you seen the price of e-mails lately?

 

Twitter and other social media coats a fortune to subscribe to, did'nt you know that?

 

Not sure I am to clear on the price of "Core costs" though, its a bit of a broadbrush term that.......are you aware of the financial implications relating to core costs?


Edited by LordCharles, 09 July 2014 - 10:03 AM.


#45 Marauder

Marauder
  • Coach
  • 11,764 posts

Posted 10 July 2014 - 09:31 PM

When the R FL where throwing money towards the amateur game in the summer, what did they actually give to the BARLA regional leagues?


Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.



http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/

#46 Death to the Rah Rah's

Death to the Rah Rah's
  • Coach
  • 466 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 03:23 PM

Hmmm .... NOTHING!!!

#47 LordCharles

LordCharles
  • Coach
  • 706 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 03:29 PM

Any idea why that was the case?

 

The RFL currently chuck 50K a year at the NCL just to subsidise travel costs in that League!


Edited by LordCharles, 11 July 2014 - 03:33 PM.


#48 Bedford Roughyed

Bedford Roughyed
  • Moderator
  • 5,171 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 03:54 PM

Throwing money?  4 free balls a season for a while...


With the best, thats a good bit of PR, though I would say the Bedford team, theres, like, you know, 13 blokes who can get together at the weekend to have a game together, which doesnt point to expansion of the game. Point, yeah go on!

#49 Defender1

Defender1
  • Coach
  • 239 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 03:57 PM


The RFL currently chuck 50K a year at the NCL just to subsidise travel costs in that League!

Is that to keep them on side? from the recent NCL survey results everything seems fine or the majority of those that responded said things are ok

Edited by Defender1, 11 July 2014 - 03:58 PM.


#50 LordCharles

LordCharles
  • Coach
  • 706 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 04:07 PM

Is that to keep them on side? from the recent NCL survey results everything seems fine or the majority of those that responded said things are ok


I think that is a very cynical view Defender1.

#51 Bedford Roughyed

Bedford Roughyed
  • Moderator
  • 5,171 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 04:31 PM

So if the RFL supports the NCL, it's a bribe?  I presume if they withdrew the funding you would castigate them for abandoning the grassroots?


With the best, thats a good bit of PR, though I would say the Bedford team, theres, like, you know, 13 blokes who can get together at the weekend to have a game together, which doesnt point to expansion of the game. Point, yeah go on!

#52 LordCharles

LordCharles
  • Coach
  • 706 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:18 PM

So if the RFL supports the NCL, it's a bribe?  I presume if they withdrew the funding you would castigate them for abandoning the grassroots?


No.....more that you would think all leagues at grassroots would carry as much importance and warrant as much support, financial or otherwise as the next.

Strategically the RFL have financially supported certain grassroots leagues and have offered to financially support/acquire others, which at that time was rebuffed due to the alleged "uncomfortable" nature of the direct approach to individual reps on behalf of said leagues.

The point being, they know damn well they can't support everyone so have only put eggs in certain baskets to the benefit of themselves via the political strength/weight it brings as a result.

Recent discussions have been had at Community Board level regarding what the "consequences" will be for those grassroots leagues who chose to remain officially outside of the RFL umbrella come the start of 2015.

A case of sign up or else, hardly the correct approach from the NGB if a regional leagues membership doesn't feel it is appropriate to fall under the RFL's governance and policy.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users