Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

DR mess


  • Please log in to reply
69 replies to this topic

#1 phildog

phildog
  • Moderator
  • 306 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 09:38 AM

So Dewsbury have their response, not guilty. Wasn't our case held at the same meeting? How many of our 38 points have they knocked off!! Anyone from Donny got any idea of their result?

#2 buford t justice

buford t justice
  • Coach
  • 1,797 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 10:42 AM

Ive heard a whisper weve got a 3 point deduction as opposed to a fine.

Sundays game is make or break if true.

Edited by buford t justice, 06 August 2014 - 10:44 AM.

What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law

#3 Piggy's mate

Piggy's mate
  • Coach
  • 3,196 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 10:45 AM

Fair if we're guilty

Now where did I leave that pointy thing that bloke Damocles gave me, I've work to do!


 

BATLEY BULLDOGS RLFC :bb:


#4 From the South

From the South
  • Coach
  • 216 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 10:58 AM

Kevin said this on 1st August

 

"Update - matters will be looked at by Rfl next week and if they feel a Tribunal should decide any issues need to give 7 days notice so will be sorted by following week I am lead to believe."

 

Now if he has got this right and I have no reason to think otherwise, and if I have interpreted it correctly, a decision on any penalty cannot have been made yet. Dewsbury have been told they have no case to answer, I suspect the RFL think we have and it will be referred to a tribunal to decide any penalty imposed. Batley have to be given 7 days notice of this tribunal, so if we have a case to answer it will not be for a while before we know the outcome.


Edited by From the South, 06 August 2014 - 10:59 AM.


#5 LeeF

LeeF
  • Coach
  • 802 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 11:05 AM

Announcement by RFL later today

#6 phildog

phildog
  • Moderator
  • 306 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 04:54 PM

Well, we have a comment under 'oh dear', does anyone know how Dewsbury's case differs from ours and Docaster? AND, if they dock points (surely it can't be more than 3) can we survive if we don't beat Whitehaven, considering we still have to play Dewsbury and Doncaster? Let's hope they only fine us.



#7 redditchbulldog

redditchbulldog
  • Coach
  • 1,676 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 04:54 PM

14th august is when we get to know what happens if found guilty


Stoopid Cup Winner 2012

#8 JimbobRam

JimbobRam
  • Coach
  • 405 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 05:59 PM

Our case differs to yours due to the fact our dual player earns less then 20k a year. Whilst yours and Doncaster's are paid over the 20k mark.

#9 DavidM

DavidM
  • Coach
  • 6,002 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:12 PM

Does the fact Donny didn't win their game make a difference regard them losing points ?

#10 toffee

toffee
  • Coach
  • 232 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:14 PM

Yet again the governing body makes a cock up introduce dualreg then put all reponsibilty on the clubs . Why should clubs be held accountable for this . They run the game and then pass the buck to the clubs who are part time to make sure they have followed correct procedure . Then penilise the clubs for not doing the job they should be doing correctly

#11 Ackropj

Ackropj
  • Coach
  • 311 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:27 PM

Yet again the governing body makes a cock up introduce dualreg then put all reponsibilty on the clubs . Why should clubs be held accountable for this . They run the game and then pass the buck to the clubs who are part time to make sure they have followed correct procedure . Then penilise the clubs for not doing the job they should be doing correctly


Are you for real, the Blame lies solely with your board and your coach. If they want to play the duel reg game then read the bloody rules first!!. Fax fielding in eligible player in the challenge cup got us kicked out and you went through automatically. Martin Hall resigned because of it.

Does anyone know who complained in the first place?.

#12 coolie

coolie
  • Coach
  • 3,858 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:35 PM

Are you for real, the Blame lies solely with your board and your coach. If they want to play the duel reg game then read the bloody rules first!!. Fax fielding in eligible player in the challenge cup got us kicked out and you went through automatically. Martin Hall resigned because of it.

Does anyone know who complained in the first place?.


mark "tappy up" aston

sore losing sheffield coach

#13 weighman

weighman
  • Coach
  • 196 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:54 PM

Sheffield ( allegedly ) may have their own problems with a loanee not having a valid work permit (allegedly).

#14 morty

morty
  • Coach
  • 2,171 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:59 PM

this is another reason DR should be consigned to the scrapheap

Lee Morton

 

Raiders have risen from the ashes


#15 GeordieTownie

GeordieTownie
  • Coach
  • 1,286 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 07:02 PM

Does the fact Donny didn't win their game make a difference regard them losing points ?


It shouldn't. They played him hoping that he'd enable them to win and they didn't so for me they should lose an additional 3!

#16 Blind side johnny

Blind side johnny
  • Coach
  • 9,455 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 07:14 PM

Yet again the governing body makes a cock up introduce dualreg then put all reponsibilty on the clubs . Why should clubs be held accountable for this . They run the game and then pass the buck to the clubs who are part time to make sure they have followed correct procedure . Then penilise the clubs for not doing the job they should be doing correctly

 

 

I think that they make the gross assumption that clubs operating in a professional sport will have a professional administration.

 

Clearly they were wrong, so it's all the RFL's fault.


Believe what you see, don't see what you believe.


John Ray (1627 - 1705)

#17 DOGFATHER

DOGFATHER
  • Coach
  • 260 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 07:42 PM

 


Edited by DOGFATHER, 06 August 2014 - 07:49 PM.


#18 John North

John North
  • Coach
  • 1,539 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 07:47 PM

I know the RFL have to give 7 days notice prior to a tribunal hearing but might it not be better for Batley/Doncaster to waive that right in order to get the hearing to take place asap?

I would think that it would benefit both clubs to know what (if any) penalty is going to be imposed sooner rather than later?

 

(assuming that the clubs dont need the time to build a defence)


Edited by John North, 06 August 2014 - 07:48 PM.

Red Amber Black - Its that simple

#19 Piggy's mate

Piggy's mate
  • Coach
  • 3,196 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 08:02 PM

Oh I'm sure Kevin will be building a defence! He can make a stamp stick back-to-front that guy and we'll probably come out of it with three extra points for the inconvenience :lol:

Now where did I leave that pointy thing that bloke Damocles gave me, I've work to do!


 

BATLEY BULLDOGS RLFC :bb:


#20 LeeF

LeeF
  • Coach
  • 802 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 08:09 PM

Sheffield ( allegedly ) may have their own problems with a loanee not having a valid work permit (allegedly).


They have been cleared of that by the RFL - it was in League Express




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users