The Parksider

Coach
  • Content count

    12,336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

955 Excellent

About The Parksider

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

10,222 profile views
  1. Unlike the shambles of clubs in Superleague eh? The failed clubs that have 8,000,000 people on their doorstep and a motorway linking them all up and yeh, look at how rubbish they have done despite 20 years of TV money - all wasted. Yet in a matter of month's Toronto have achieved so much more and showed our useless clubs the "phenomenal" way forward. Read Og's post that sets out for you the reality so far as regards Toronto. Come back to me when they make a real "phenomenal" achievement
  2. How about you engage in the actual debate and points made. Every Toronto thread clearly raises the issue of their SL ambitions as does this one as does the last several threads on Toronto. Or do you want to shout down debate by narrowing down this thread to exactly what? How do we think Brierley will go playing for Toronto? I'll say OK .
  3. The context is clearly stated. The reality is 7,500 people the bulk of them from WMDC watched Cas last year no different to 2008. The reality is Millward's coaching dragged the club down whilst the brilliant Powell has dragged them right back up there. Gill is a fine fellow but Powell effectively joined his home town club, and joined to get a SL coaching berth. Gill didn't have to do anything to persuade him and can't reasonably be credited with pulling off a masterstroke. As for debts the Fulton family should take the credit for helping to clear those. It's a vacuuous article.
  4. They may have a different opinion or they may call you a Capper Gary and try to shout you down as being negative or an RU troll etc etc. The other day I posed this question about what would happen here if we reduced the footprint of M62 clubs in SL, In 1996 the idea was that less but bigger clubs would see all the fans and players outside the immediate areas of those clubs getting excited about Calder, Cheshire Manchester and Humberside etc. I don't think that anyone over the last 20 years now sees that as a good thing or thinks for example that if Leeds and Bradford were the only West Yorkshire SL clubs in a transatlantic league RL would prosper. That was your stance too and so I do think it's worth thinking hard about this. It would be hard to deny Toronto a chance in SL if that could be a catalyst for their own game to grow, there is room and if new clubs can bring big money then more room can be made to 14 clubs. This is what Lenegan's stance was and it's a fair one.
  5. "In these parts, rugby league is not so much a hobby as it is a way of life. A quarter of the town’s 40,000 population watch Castleford Tigers" Really? Nobody from Ponte or Knottingley then?
  6. He said:- The long game here is 10 years from now if a SL team can draw eyeballs. Its taken 10 years for MLS (North American soccer pro league) to get eyeballs for TV games. It will take that long, if not longer for TWP. There is a LOOOONG history in Toronto and Canada of failed sports adventures. People are seriously skeptical of TWP. More importantly, the awareness of the team locally is next to nil (yes I saw that Sun article - one of their biggest advertisers is Air Transat - take it with a grain of salt). Toronto is a "top league or we don't care" town. Until the TWP are in SL, attendance and interest will remain dampened. I'd be sure Toronto will get some sort of junior system going but it will be hard to do. As above Og argues that Toronto would need to be in SL to generate genuine interest to attract the kids. It's the same here, you generally need a local SL club to get the kids coming along in enough numbers and to get decent athletes amongst them. It will probably be a catch 22 with Lenegan saying "develop Canadians" and Toronto saying "We can do that but we need to be in SL to do so"..... That's the stand off I've envisaged all along, whilst others have envisaged half a dozen North American Superleague clubs in the next decade.
  7. They probably don't even need to do that. They just need to appoint some of their own people to offer local kids the chance to try Rugby League. It may be that the cart has to come before the horse and Toronto actually need to play home games to kick the possible interest off. Then I assume they will embark on the path of fighting RU for the same kids. RU offers no professional pathway which is what Toronto are boasting. They've promised to so something, as Double D says. There is time for that to still happen this season once Toronto start to get through a batch of home games. Let's see what they say and do then when they are in front of their own audience.
  8. http://www.canadarugbyleague.com/canadian-young-athlete-first-win-professional-rugby-league-contract/ This is the very start of the young player development with Ngwati who has New Zealand roots being the first to join the club as a Canada based player. The base they have to build on is the same as anywhere, i.e. any young players who fancy a career in RL. Ngwati will maybe get a run in the home games.
  9. Re-read your slavish proclamations of how Castleford are a paragon of virtue, the special ones, for "getting of their Asses" to develop the club management and new stadium all the way to the top. So who hasn't "got off their asses"?? Inference is a trick many people play on here. Indirect criticism. You can clear this up by admitting Wakefield, your local rivals your post made an inferred dig at, are making as great an effort as Cas are to move their business forward.
  10. Thanks for being brave enough to talk about the issues. (1) 10 years of heavily invested Canadian Junior development will most likely start to produce Canadian SL level players by then but one or two not a 25 man squad. Toronto face having to get away with dipping into the English, French and NRL player pools heavily for many years. By talking about the Burgesses and signing the Brierleys' this elephant in the room is now coming to the fore. (2) Toronto can't also steal English Juniors for an English Academy and call them Canadian as well. That trick is wearing off already. (3) There isn't a reserves league to play in BUT, what they said about Canadian development IIRC was there were a lot of Grid iron players wanting a tryout. What better an idea than to actually start looking for Canadian Trialists and get them in a Canadian Toronto team and come over and play Siddal, Brighouse etc. it would really boost their PR and it would put money into the coffers of the amateur game here.?
  11. What? You mean like at Acton, Liverpool, Coventry, Gateshead, Crusaders, Kent, Newcastle, Mansfield, Nottingham, Pontypridd, Liverpool, Carlsle, Streatham, Scarboro, Paris, Sheffield, Chorley, Blackpool Runcorn and so on?? It's not "bound to fail" but it's a very tough ask, however it won't hurt their progress one bit to talk about the challenges they face along the way. Everyone wants them to succeed, of course they do, but they need to bring something to European Superleague not take it out. The more they take SL players away like Brierley and the more CEO's like Thewlis speak of the problems with the "thin" SL player pool, the quicker the honeymoon period will end. Yes the owners are apparently mega rich, but if the European SL doesn't see much of that money, or benefit positively from it -as Lenegan said of Toulouse - "Bring us a TV contract, bring us a new pool of playing talent" - then the bandwagon will probably come to an abrupt halt.
  12. You don't need to actually refer to Wakefield. All you need to do is talk as though Castleford have made great efforts to sort their club and ground out whilst others have not, Wakefield is the obvious inference. All you need to do is actually mention them and tell me you admit that Wakefields efforts have been as strong as Castlefords. Your the one winding others up declaring Castleford have done so much to improve their club whilst others have been lazy, so go on name the "lazy" clubs and stop winding others up.
  13. Thanks very much indeed, Off topic I know, but as you mentioned it a few minutes ago on another thread that Brierley was now going to Canada it's worth pointing out what Thewlis at Fartown said:- "Giants Managing Director Richard Thewlis (said) From our side the search for additions to the squad is an ongoing process and whilst it may be viewed that this strengthens our position in being able to recruit the reality is that the player market is incredibly thin in the UK." And so they are already raiding SL for players leaving such as Huddersfield nowhere to plug those gaps. It may or may not be a good thing if gradually half our playing staff go off to North America to help it "grow" there (If there is any intention of producing players apparently the Canadians are not bothered), but the current ban on talking about it imposed by Toronto's cheerleaders on here means I'll have to leave that with you.
  14. And that quote is well worth remembering when we're projecting stuff like a 2x10 superleague.
  15. We'll have to hold that thought Gary, as it's "off topic" but certainly it poses fundamental questions about allowing North American teams into Superleague. Once the cheerleaders calm down and get down to actually being able to discuss the problematic situation Toronto pose, we can resurrect this.........