Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Red Willow

The Photography Thread

3,004 posts in this topic

This is bloody genius: recreating famous images using Lego men. There are some on the BBC site but not this one:

The Full Set

Quality! Thanks for sharing the link, some of those are fantastic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The fire exit sign spoils that. Not rock n' roll.

Tell that to Deep Purple. :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I quite like this one...

DSC05444.jpg

Good stuff. Nice reflection in the water and nice trail from the swan to the pond/lake as well.

Could it be cropped a little tighter though - just a personal opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jessops have a deal on at the moment

450D plus the usual lens it comes with a card and telephoto/macro lens for

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - where's everybody else's photies??? :dry:

Here are some from my debut run with my lovely new Nikkor 70-300 on the South Bank on Friday.

2576460892_683ac3a844.jpg

2575633559_8dd477e68a.jpg

2576462896_6771664182.jpg

2575631665_f1d642877e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a bit of a wizz with the old black and white shots GJ. The accordion player is spot on. Does your camera allow you to shoot in b&w? I have to take photos in colour and remove the colour with photoshop and it all looks a bit washed out, no where near as sharp as yours - whats your secret, hows about a quick lesson?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Got a Canon S5 IS last month, its a step up from a normal digi camera but is obviously not as big a step as a digi SLR. I was thinking of getting a SLR but the cost at this moment was too much (especially all the extra lenses!)

I can get a lense adapters that -

The TC-DC58B tele-converter converts the focal length of the body lens by a factor of approximately 1.5 (35 mm film equivalent at maximum telephoto: approximately 648 mm) when attached.

or

Converts the focal length of the body lens by a factor of approximately 0.75 (35 mm film equivalent at maximum wide angle: approximately 27 mm) when attached.

But what that all that mean? What does it do to my pics?

Anybody know what those 2 lenses would do to my pics? In simple terms?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Right - where's everybody else's photies??? :dry:

Here are some from my debut run with my lovely new Nikkor 70-300 on the South Bank on Friday.

2576460892_683ac3a844.jpg

2575633559_8dd477e68a.jpg

2576462896_6771664182.jpg

2575631665_f1d642877e.jpg

By an amazing coincidence I was stood at the bus stop on Waterloo Bridge with those Albanian tinkers on Saturday night - they got on every damn bus for half an hour and tried to steam on and not pay! Either they're garbage buskers or they we're telling a porkie about not having any change...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Help!!!!!!!!!!!

I have a SD card, I have tried a few test photos which I can see on the view finder but neither card reader seems to be able to see the card. Have I done something wrong? (or not done something)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help!!!!!!!!!!!

I have a SD card, I have tried a few test photos which I can see on the view finder but neither card reader seems to be able to see the card. Have I done something wrong? (or not done something)

It could be a SD HC card which I believe some readers don't recognise?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It could be a SD HC card which I believe some readers don't recognise?

It is in deed does this mean I need a new card reader? My lap top doesn't recognise it either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is in deed does this mean I need a new card reader? My lap top doesn't recognise it either.

'Fraid so...

I got a new internal reader from Scan for about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Either they're garbage buskers or they we're telling a porkie about not having any change...

They're very good buskers so they're probably lying furriners.

You are a bit of a wizz with the old black and white shots GJ. The accordion player is spot on. Does your camera allow you to shoot in b&w? I have to take photos in colour and remove the colour with photoshop and it all looks a bit washed out, no where near as sharp as yours - whats your secret, hows about a quick lesson?

Well, to take the accordion player ...

This is original - all I've done here is re-save the original RAW file as a jpeg.

2585131646_bd03a6df65.jpg

And here it's just been converted to grayscale. If I used the camera's B/W function this is what it would look like. It's okay here but you're right in that it can just be washed out - plus if all you do is desaturate or convert to BW this is what happens. Plus having the image as black and white/desaturated limits what you can in terms of filters.

2585132720_95c7127e70.jpg

So. The gingerjon way - which is probably not the best way but it delivers the results I like is:

Open the RAW image in Photoshop Elements. Sort out any under/over exposure and white balance. Boost the clarity. Open image in the editing window.

With the image still in colour adjust first levels and the brightness & contrast. At this stage it will look somewhat unnatural in colour as I'm looking to build up contrasts (although without going crazy) - so the levels will probably move the midtones slightly and possibly drift in the under and over exposure bit. On the contrast I will probably move it within the range of +1 to +6 and move the brightness either + or - up to 4 or 5.

So that's three layers after which I flatten the image to get back to 1. Then I apply the Gradient Map which is the best tool for converting to monochrome. It's best to experiment with this - I like using the orange/red end of the filter and having it almost black but not quite.

Again flatten the image. Now go to enhance image and apply the Unsharp Mask. I tend to use: 60%, radius 1.0 pixels with 0.0 threshold - don't ask me what all that means I got there by experimenting!

Finally apply any colour filters as required which will help with the overall toning of the image. This is something that can't be done if the shot has been converted to BW or was shot in monochrome mode.

Flatten image. Save.

And that's that. Probably clear as mud. :unsure:

Mods: Can we merge the two photo threads we have going please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They're very good buskers so they're probably lying furriners.

Well, to take the accordion player ...

This is original - all I've done here is re-save the original RAW file as a jpeg.

2585131646_bd03a6df65.jpg

And here it's just been converted to grayscale. If I used the camera's B/W function this is what it would look like. It's okay here but you're right in that it can just be washed out - plus if all you do is desaturate or convert to BW this is what happens. Plus having the image as black and white/desaturated limits what you can in terms of filters.

2585132720_95c7127e70.jpg

So. The gingerjon way - which is probably not the best way but it delivers the results I like is:

Open the RAW image in Photoshop Elements. Sort out any under/over exposure and white balance. Boost the clarity. Open image in the editing window.

With the image still in colour adjust first levels and the brightness & contrast. At this stage it will look somewhat unnatural in colour as I'm looking to build up contrasts (although without going crazy) - so the levels will probably move the midtones slightly and possibly drift in the under and over exposure bit. On the contrast I will probably move it within the range of +1 to +6 and move the brightness either + or - up to 4 or 5.

So that's three layers after which I flatten the image to get back to 1. Then I apply the Gradient Map which is the best tool for converting to monochrome. It's best to experiment with this - I like using the orange/red end of the filter and having it almost black but not quite.

Again flatten the image. Now go to enhance image and apply the Unsharp Mask. I tend to use: 60%, radius 1.0 pixels with 0.0 threshold - don't ask me what all that means I got there by experimenting!

Finally apply any colour filters as required which will help with the overall toning of the image. This is something that can't be done if the shot has been converted to BW or was shot in monochrome mode.

Flatten image. Save.

And that's that. Probably clear as mud. :unsure:

Mods: Can we merge the two photo threads we have going please?

Double geek.

I thought this thread was about ordinary people taking ordinary photo's , not a masterclass from BBC 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mods: Can we merge the two photo threads we have going please?

Done :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is bloody genius: recreating famous images using Lego men. There are some on the BBC site but not this one:

The Twickenham Streaker

I thought it was jesus being arrested in the garden of gethsemane

2489710349_57673b836d.jpg

The Full Set

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You must be happy with that new lens.

I am so far! Not had chance to test on action pics yet and it's a bit top heavy on my light camera but it really does the job. There's some free lunchtime concerts near work this week and providing I can dodge the PCSOs and Park Police I'll be taking some snaps there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is in deed does this mean I need a new card reader? My lap top doesn't recognise it either.

I've had the same problem, I have started plugging the lead in to the camera and the pc and dragging/drop the pics off the camera to the pc. So haven't had to buy a new card reader (yet!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've had the same problem, I have started plugging the lead in to the camera and the pc and dragging/drop the pics off the camera to the pc. So haven't had to buy a new card reader (yet!)

I always worry about attaching the camera, I'd rather pay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the issue with plugging the camera straight in? :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's the issue with plugging the camera straight in? :unsure:

Never heard of camera weevils? Nasty little buggers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Never heard of camera weevils? Nasty little buggers.

Are they the bastards that have put blotches on the inside of my viewfinder?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 10th April 2017

Rugby League World - April 2017