Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Lobbygobbler

Brian Carney on B&A on Wed

51 posts in this topic

'New stadia,' doesn't have to mean new stadia since they were last in the league.

Correct my Cheshire Friend.... A yorky pudding trying to be a smart ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ooer, the Cheshire mafia are closing ranks. :lol:

Well i am spending the afternoon in Widnes tomorrow :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well i am spending the afternoon in Widnes tomorrow :P

Now I understand why you're closing ranks. ;) Is it missionary work or community service?

Edited by deluded pom?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now I understand why you're closing ranks. ;) Is it missionary work or community service?

Day release ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ooer, the Cheshire mafia are closing ranks. :lol:

As someone who was actually born in God's own county (That's Cheshire before anyone asks), can I remind everyone that Widnes and Warrington are in Lancashire. They are NOT in Cheshire.

Thank you :angry::lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As someone who was actually born in God's own county (That's Cheshire before anyone asks), can I remind everyone that Widnes and Warrington are in Lancashire. They are NOT in Cheshire.

Thank you :angry::lol:

i was born in 76, and Warrington was part of Cheshire ;);)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i was born in 76, and Warrington was part of Cheshire ;);)

From 1974-1997 Warrington was put under the control of Cheshire County Council. This was purely for administrative purposes. North of the Manchester Ship Canal is Lancashire, south is Cheshire. That has never changed.

And anyway, what's wrong with coming from Lancashire? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From 1974-1997 Warrington was put under the control of Cheshire County Council. This was purely for administrative purposes. North of the Manchester Ship Canal is Lancashire, south is Cheshire. That has never changed.

And anyway, what's wrong with coming from Lancashire? :)

Nowt........and that means i've always been cheshire :P

You going tomorrow, I'll be in the Widnes Bowling Green

PM if you want to meet up??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And anyway, what's wrong with coming from Lancashire? :)

Sorry mate but I don't have the time or the inclination to answer that one. I'm on holiday in a fortnight. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nowt........and that means i've always been cheshire :P

You going tomorrow, I'll be in the Widnes Bowling Green

PM if you want to meet up??

Sorry, not going tomorrow. We've had to forgo watching Warrington this year after we went to Oz at easter. I didn't want to go but my wife insisted... :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I totally disagree with Carney's view about licensing on Wed. He siad that they should forget about defo promoting one club and just make sure the best 14 teams are there

This is a totally flawed argument because the teams in the Co-Op championship don't get the opportunity to get big crowds week in week out for at least 3-years, so cannot be equally compared to SL clubs. Also do we really want to restrict the number of towns to 14 who can ever have aspirations?

Also someone needs to explain the "chicken and egg" situation to everyone on sky and at the RFL.

People will not watch RL in numbers much great than 1-2k if there is no definite route to promotion on-the-pitch

Also investors will not come in unless there is a guaranteed route. What happens if two clubs were meeting the criteria at the moment? In reality the RFL shoudl put both up BUT they will not. Therefore this puts off fans and investors

The RFL has just layed out some criteria, so why not modify it to say that the highest placed club who wins the most things AND meets the other criteria then defo goes up

agreed

just because somebody can play the game doesnt mean they have a clue whats good for the sport as a whole

widnes in SL will get bigger crowds than at least 2 current heartland teams

plus if clubs from outside SL are excluded then there is no reason for these clubs to improve, nor for clubs like cas or wakey to improve either

wakey being relegated for widnes will be a very good thing for the game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A Yorkshireman would have put his foot down. ;)

So I believe. I think I saw it once on a documentary about life in Yorkshire. It was called Last of the Summer Wine, or something like that... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So I believe. I think I saw it once on a documentary about life in Yorkshire. It was called Last of the Summer Wine, or something like that... ;)

I saw something in a documentary about a henpecked husband in Lancashire. Jack something they called him. It was called Coronation Street or something like that. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I saw something in a documentary about a henpecked husband in Lancashire. Jack something they called him. It was called Coronation Street or something like that. ;)

:lol::lol::lol:

I take it you haven't seen any shows about Cheshire then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:lol::lol::lol:

I take it you haven't seen any shows about Cheshire then?

North of the Mersey is Lancashire. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
North of the Mersey is Lancashire. ;)

I assume you haven't read through all the posts then? :rolleyes:

And anyway, North Of the Manchester Ship Canal is Lancashire.

(btw What's the weather like in Humberside today?)

Edited by thirteenthman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I assume you haven't read through all the posts then? :rolleyes:

And anyway, North Of the Manchester Ship Canal is Lancashire.

(btw What's the weather like in Humberside today?)

I was close. One Lancy river looks much like another ;) Weather's been fine here mate. Thanks for asking ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm an English republican and I don't sing that ####.

It should not be the anthem for GB&I anyway

well said..

he isnt an irish republican as such, he is just simply Irish and playing for Great Britain and Ireland.. he isnt taking the Queens shilling he was playing for the representative team of Great Britain and Ireland the fact the athem is wrong and insulting to anyone from ireland (ignoring the other arguments as you post above, which i would tend to agree with) is more the point than his quite obvious and understandable refusal to sing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I totally disagree with Carney's view about licensing on Wed. He siad that they should forget about defo promoting one club and just make sure the best 14 teams are there

This is a totally flawed argument because the teams in the Co-Op championship don't get the opportunity to get big crowds week in week out for at least 3-years, so cannot be equally compared to SL clubs. Also do we really want to restrict the number of towns to 14 who can ever have aspirations?

Also someone needs to explain the "chicken and egg" situation to everyone on sky and at the RFL.

People will not watch RL in numbers much great than 1-2k if there is no definite route to promotion on-the-pitch

Also investors will not come in unless there is a guaranteed route. What happens if two clubs were meeting the criteria at the moment? In reality the RFL shoudl put both up BUT they will not. Therefore this puts off fans and investors

The RFL has just layed out some criteria, so why not modify it to say that the highest placed club who wins the most things AND meets the other criteria then defo goes up

I think the whole point of what Carney was saying has been completely missed..

He said the RFL made a mistake in guarenteeing a place to the club in the championship... i agree personally... His point being that thy made abit of a rod for their own back and that IF there werent better clubs applying then they could be getting rid of a strong club for a weaker club.. his point is a bit out dated as there will be a better club applying than in the league but IMO it is a fair point, there should be no guarentees and that inclkudes for super league clubs.. which IMO is the point he was making..

he was saying that all clubs from the Super League should apply as should AS MANY AS POSSIBLE from below that, anyone who is interested basically. And the top 14 (in this case) should be in no matter where they are playing at the moment.

so his point is that the best teams should be int he super league, i dont see anything wrong with that.

Also do we really want to restrict the number of towns to 14 who can ever have aspirations?

whos doing this exactly?

You limit the numbers due to the money coming in, this time around it was announced that it would be 14 becuase the money was there for 14 but no monre. Next time around if the money is more they may well up it to 15 or 16 there is no definate "it will be 14 for ever more" it is taken round by round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You limit the numbers due to the money coming in, this time around it was announced that it would be 14 becuase the money was there for 14 but no monre. Next time around if the money is more they may well up it to 15 or 16 there is no definate "it will be 14 for ever more" it is taken round by round.

:wacko: How many clubs you have included depends not on the money but how you share it. You can go for a 10 club ultrasuper league, or a 20 club all inclusive league.

The number is down to a decision, not the money.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Barrow and Featherstone were once in the top division, so they've had their chance and blown it. Or do we ignore anything pre-1996?

1996. The top 12 teams in the old division would be going to creating a new super league. Fev finished 12th that season but were dropped to make way for a team from Paris. That worked out well then :lol: Promotion and relegation should be brought back, its about the team,the way they've played all season,not about the shiny new stadium that a team has! One question that should be asked is, would we as rugby fans rather be comfortable in a new stadium and watch the same teams winning all the time, with the stronger teams getting stronger and the weaker teams getting weaker or watch good rugby with two teams playing with pride and passion because they deserve to be in that league not because they have a better capacity that someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:wacko: How many clubs you have included depends not on the money but how you share it. You can go for a 10 club ultrasuper league, or a 20 club all inclusive league.

The number is down to a decision, not the money.....

mumps/measels... same argument really, either more money or re splitting the money but its still down to that rather than someone saying "we will never have more than 14"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - April 2017

League Express - Mon 10th April 2017