Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

usain bolt

ncl discipline minutes 15th oct

92 posts in this topic

What about the Pats lad who headbutted the East player, the linesman comes on and clearly indicates it to the ref, then he runs back in and headbutts another player off the ball, the second just out of camera shot, but clearly seen by everyone as play was still stopped and the ref gives a yellow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A definite high tackle but I would say more a reaction than a deliberate act. The ban is far too severe for the offence and if the NCL disciplinary code sets this as a new benchmark then they will be deliberating on games of tick & pass in the future. Rugby League is a contact sport and tackles like this one happen, occasionally intentionally but more often then not due to poor position, timing or reaction. The NCL Management Committee should appeal the decision to reduce it to a more reasonable punishment of six games to prevent a shambles of a 2013 season which they can do without in the current climate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know anything about the lad or his previous disciplinary records, but it must be bad for them to give a 12 month ban for that. However it doesnt matter how bad it is, they cannot justify 12 months from what I can see there.

Did the club and player attend the disciplinary?

If this is going to be how it is from now on, teams are going to struggle even more, never mind weddings and holidays half the players will be banned. Once again - absolute joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently no appearance at the Discipline hearing from Leigh East which I find strange , everybody in the game knows if you do not make an appearance at the original hearing then you lose your right of appeal .

Think its fair to say there is a groundswell of opinion that the punishment does not fit the crime so to speak , so why cant for the discipline panel review the decision or perhaps if someone from the panel at least give an explination as to the severity.

Read below the RFL GUIDLINES where does a twelve month ban fit in , something is quite clearly wrong with this decision.

http://www.therfl.co.uk/~rflmedia/docs/On%20Field%20Compliance%20Sentencing%20Guidelines%202012%20-%20Final.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd forgot that one, just watched it. Actually worse than the hit by Kilsh

There are things that go on in that game that go un punished so i am wondering did the panel watch the whole DVD ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know anything about the lad or his previous disciplinary records, but it must be bad for them to give a 12 month ban for that. However it doesnt matter how bad it is, they cannot justify 12 months from what I can see there.

Did the club and player attend the disciplinary?

If this is going to be how it is from now on, teams are going to struggle even more, never mind weddings and holidays half the players will be banned. Once again - absolute joke.

From our own personal experience, there is no doubt that if you appear before the Committee they do appear to take a more favourable view on events. Not sure why, mind you, as this leads to inconsistencies in the bans handed out, in my opinion anyway :rolleyes: .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they had a personal appearance because they thought he might get a 6 or 8game ban and he thought fair enough I deserve it,but kilsh is on about retiring now and to me that's not right when there's videos showing lads running in on brawls and late tackles which are far worse than a reaction tackle like the one kilsh did

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they had a personal appearance because they thought he might get a 6 or 8game ban and he thought fair enough I deserve it,but kilsh is on about retiring now and to me that's not right when there's videos showing lads running in on brawls and late tackles which are far worse than a reaction tackle like the one kilsh did

I dont know anything about the lad or his previous disciplinary records, but it must be bad for them to give a 12 month ban for that. However it doesnt matter how bad it is, they cannot justify 12 months from what I can see there.

Did the club and player attend the disciplinary?

If this is going to be how it is from now on, teams are going to struggle even more, never mind weddings and holidays half the players will be banned. Once again - absolute joke.

I was told on Wednesday night that the lad in question is still suffering fits. After the incident the lad was hospitalised till Sunday night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently no appearance at the Discipline hearing from Leigh East which I find strange , everybody in the game knows if you do not make an appearance at the original hearing then you lose your right of appeal .

Think its fair to say there is a groundswell of opinion that the punishment does not fit the crime so to speak , so why cant for the discipline panel review the decision or perhaps if someone from the panel at least give an explination as to the severity.

Read below the RFL GUIDLINES where does a twelve month ban fit in , something is quite clearly wrong with this decision.

http://www.therfl.co...012 - Final.pdf

Who know sits on the disciplinary panel these days, is it still the same guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were's the forearm smash ?? Although I don't condone it, it was a high shot and the impact of the other defender wouldn't of helped the lad either. It was a sending off but 12 months ???? Very harsh. Hope the pats lad has recovered ok.

first time i have seen the video but are you trying to say he doesnt bring his arm back and deliberetely smash him?? watch it again, your not a ref are you ???

bit harsh a 12 month ban and he admitted to some of the spectators on his way off he deserved to go, the ban must reflect his previous record

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 12 month ban is a disgrace for Dan Kilshaw who has given 24 years of his life to amateur Rugby League and Leigh East ARLFC.He has represented his country on numerous occasions and is probably the best amateur player in the country.

This is certainly not the best way to end such a prestigious career,,,,,,

He has always been a target on the Rugby field and spectators have turned up to watch the game as Kilsh was playing and bayed for his blood.

I think the NCL have to reconsider this judgement as we are going to have no players playing if this is the way they are going to do things..... I realise that the lad in the tackle from Pats had a fit,,,, is he epileptic,???,,, did the club know this,,,???, the tackle may not have caused the fit???

the discipline committee have not watched the game , but as the guidelines say all evidence must be used ,,, and when giving such a hefty ban ALL EVIDENCE should have been used..

Lets hope the NCL see sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

first time i have seen the video but are you trying to say he doesnt bring his arm back and deliberetely smash him?? watch it again, your not a ref are you ???

bit harsh a 12 month ban and he admitted to some of the spectators on his way off he deserved to go, the ban must reflect his previous record

I cant see how his prevous record can be so bad as to justify 12 months and having watched the video the player does seem instantly remorseful about the tackle what happened to the player is unfortunate but should not be a massive factor when deciding the punishment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly I hope the lad makes a full recover, however I don't think that this should reflect on the punishment. I am no medical expert but fitting is not normally a result of being hit in the face, broken jaw, nose etc is, therefore I would suggest the lad may have had a condition he knew or didnt know about.

With regards to Kulshaws disciplinary record. If he has played in the pack for so many years he will have picked up a few cards here and there, especially if he is as popular as he sounds. However the best forwards in the game are the same, Peacock, Morley, Mcdermott, Fielden etc. It goes with the territory im afraid.

Ive seen players spit at middle aged female fans, players stamp on opposition players head and blind side opposition players (that was just in one game) and guess what nothing came of it.

However you cant escape the fact that Leigh East and the player himself have been slack by not attending (or di they set off and the bus broke down?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point regarding the 12 month ban. are Liegh East running a open age winter? If they are say the ncl thinking may have been if we give him 10/12 match ban these would be served with the winter side and he gets away with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point regarding the 12 month ban. are Liegh East running a open age winter? If they are say the ncl thinking may have been if we give him 10/12 match ban these would be served with the winter side and he gets away with it.

well they could have banned him till say April to stop that,but to ban him for a full season is a joke,iv seen lads taken out intentionally and premeditated not get banned that long

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a joke, 12 months is ridiculous yes its high but 12 months? Kilshaw must of shagged the panels daughters to get that ban iv seen much worse that hasn't even received red cards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well they could have banned him till say April to stop that,but to ban him for a full season is a joke,iv seen lads taken out intentionally and premeditated not get banned that long

Kaykie in a earlier post i wrote i thought 12 months ban was harsh. I was justing trying see it from all angles.Liegh East and the player mite have viewed the winter side as thier get out of jail card. Hence not asking for personel appearance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the panel have not seen the video what have they based their decision on, the refs report? what has he said to make them come up with that decision? has he said he took him out with a forearm smash? as someone said earlier in this thread, because thats clearly wrong. Did the ref really see what happened? i had a great view and did'nt nor any of the people around me, it took me a few views of the video to see properly what happened. I think the ref has guessed what happened based on the injury. He did'nt get a lot right in the rest of the game either, but then right or wrong they will back the ref.

Perhaps if the ref in question reads this forum and has viewed the video he could contact someone to have it looked at again, i don't know if thats possible. It takes a big man to admin he has made a mistake, but if this is based on his report........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently refs report states ' High tackle but not malicious'

Were is samsung ???? very quiet on this thread..... ????? can you enlighten us ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it was a fore arm smash to one of the young lads who was trying to gather a high ball and then he landed on his head, its on vedio, i was at the game but personally not seen the vidio but been told it was pretty bad. the lads not played since and i think hes still having treatment.

No forearm smash and no high ball, the ball bounced up into his hands off a little dink over the top, were you really there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point regarding the 12 month ban. are Liegh East running a open age winter? If they are say the ncl thinking may have been if we give him 10/12 match ban these would be served with the winter side and he gets away with it.

Suspensions have to be served with the league he was playing in and also stops him from playing in anyother league, We found this out years ago when we had teams in the Hull League and West Yorkshire League during the 80's.

BARLA stopped allowing permit players because one had received a long bad at the end of the BARLA season, however the RFL overturned this bad so the permit player could go back to his pro club, just a thought but why couldn't BARLA overturn this suspension and allow Dan Kilshaw to play in the winter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 12 month ban is a disgrace for Dan Kilshaw who has given 24 years of his life to amateur Rugby League and Leigh East ARLFC.He has represented his country on numerous occasions and is probably the best amateur player in the country.

This is certainly not the best way to end such a prestigious career,,,,,,

He has always been a target on the Rugby field and spectators have turned up to watch the game as Kilsh was playing and bayed for his blood.

I think the NCL have to reconsider this judgement as we are going to have no players playing if this is the way they are going to do things..... I realise that the lad in the tackle from Pats had a fit,,,, is he epileptic,???,,, did the club know this,,,???, the tackle may not have caused the fit???

the discipline committee have not watched the game , but as the guidelines say all evidence must be used ,,, and when giving such a hefty ban ALL EVIDENCE should have been used..

Lets hope the NCL see sense

How do you know the discipline committee have not watched the game? How do you know all evidence has not been used?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspensions have to be served with the league he was playing in and also stops him from playing in anyother league, We found this out years ago when we had teams in the Hull League and West Yorkshire League during the 80's.

BARLA stopped allowing permit players because one had received a long bad at the end of the BARLA season, however the RFL overturned this bad so the permit player could go back to his pro club, just a thought but why couldn't BARLA overturn this suspension and allow Dan Kilshaw to play in the winter?

Think you have got this one wrong Marauder i know of players who have served NCL bans with summer clubs and i know of one player who got 8 matches ban playing summer 2011 and he missed the four games of the new ncl season completing his ban. This may come as a shock Marauder but Barla dont control the NCL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 24th July 2017

Rugby League World - August 2017