Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Wolford6

Chris Bryant MP

100 posts in this topic

It's not my default position in everyday conversation. I may be common, but not that common.

Use of profanity has nothing to do with being common or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use of profanity has nothing to do with being common or not.

If you do not know the person you are talking to, swearing shows a lack of respect for him/her/them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suppose he lost his job ... which at a private company he could have for expenses irregularities. Would you be happy for him to come and work with students (including insecure eighteen year old lads) at your place? Would you challenge your Head of Department if he decided against making such an appointment on the basis of the reported Gaydar posting?

I would be happy for him to work with students. Why not? Why wouldn't Bryant be able to work with young lads? Do you think my single colleagues (or non-single for that matter) prey on students of the gender they are attracted to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not know the person you are talking to, swearing shows a lack of respect for him/her/them.

I assume (although I have never been on one, honest) that use of the f word to mean copulation is quite a regular occurrence. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be happy for him to work with students. Why not? Why wouldn't Bryant be able to work with young lads?

Because, as an educationalist he should be a role model for students ... accepting that everyone has flaws. However, I can't see how he is a gleaming role model in his personal or professional life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume (although I have never been on one, honest) that use of the f word to mean copulation is quite a regular occurrence. :rolleyes:

Not in my house, comparatively rarely amongst my friends and never in mixed company. The use of the word thus becomes more effective when deployed.

Like many of my generation, I'm working class with a Grammar School education

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because, as an educationalist he should be a role model for students ... accepting that everyone has flaws. However, I can't see how he is a gleaming role model in his personal or professional life.

Are you saying that Bryant isn't a good role model because he is a single gay man who used a dating site? Or because of his expenses scandal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that Bryant isn't a good role model because he is a single gay man who used a dating site? Or because of his expenses scandal?

As far as I am concernened: -

- Bryant isn't a good role model for students because he is a single gay man who used foul language looking for rampant casual sex on a dating site and because he has serial expenses scandals.

- He's a disgrace to the Valleys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am concernened: -

- Bryant isn't a good role model for students because he is a single gay man who used foul language looking for rampant casual sex on a dating site

Fair enough, you don't like bad language. Not sure what you have against a natural sexual appetite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough, you don't like bad language. Not sure what you have against a natural sexual appetite.

Well Sev, I'd never have placed you for regarding casual gay anal penetration as a natural sexual appetite.

There again, you do come from the other side of the Severn. I've heard they get up to all sorts over there.

;):D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Sev, I'd never have placed you for regarding casual gay anal penetration as a natural sexual appetite.

If you'd seen his Facebook page this wouldn't surprise you.

But it is entirely natural. It's the repulsion about what other consenting adults get up to that is unnatural.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you'd seen his Facebook page this wouldn't surprise you.

But it is entirely natural. It's the repulsion about what other consenting adults get up to that is unnatural.

Well I think gay sex between men is anything but 'entirely natural', or else any man would think nothing of trying it.

I've never tried gay sex and never will. Neither has, to my knowledge, any of my longstanding friends and colleagues. Mind you, we are all knocking on a bit.

However, seeing as gay anal penetration is apparently 'entirely natural', presumably loads of our regular younger contributors will queue up to post confirmation that they regularly indulge in it. :O

Somehow, I think that's extremely unlikely!

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think gay sex between men is anything but 'entirely natural', or else any man would think nothing of trying it.

I've never tried gay sex and never will. Neither has, to my knowledge, any of my longstanding friends and colleagues. Mind you, we are all knocking on a bit.

However, seeing as gay anal penetration is apparently 'entirely natural', presumably loads of our regular younger contributors will queue up to post confirmation that they regularly indulge in it. :O

Somehow, I think that's extremely unlikely!

:D

Now we get there, you are a homophobe.

The Rugby Football League should quite rightly be proud of its Stonewall Award and the work it has done in tackling homophobia. What do you think about it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now we get there, you are a homophobe.

What is it about this board. Everyone tries to stick labels on me.

Now apparently, I'm a homophobe.

No I'm not; I'm just not gay and will never be too timid to be anything other than politically correct. Suddenly people who think it's 'entirely natural' to have gay sex get all self-righteous because I have the temerity to laugh at their opinion.

I've worked with gay colleagues in the past and got on well with them.

Oh well, that's it for tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it about this board. Everyone tries to stick labels on me.

Now apparently, I'm a homophobe.

No I'm not; I'm just not gay and will never be too timid to be anything other than politically correct. Suddenly people who think it's 'entirely natural' to have gay sex get all self-righteous because I have the temerity to laugh at their opinion.

I've worked with gay colleagues in the past and got on well with them.

Oh well, that's it for tonight.

You have said you would discriminate against a gay man because he has used a online dating site to meet other gay men. You have said that you wouldn't want a gay man having a position of care over young people. You have said that two gay man having sex is unnatural. That sounds pretty homophobic to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have said you would discriminate against a gay man because he has used a online dating site to meet other gay men. You have said that you wouldn't want a gay man having a position of care over young people. You have said that two gay man having sex is unnatural. That sounds pretty homophobic to me.

Look, Sev, just because someone has said they don't like or trust men who have sex with other men, just because someone has described sex between two consenting men as unnatural, just because someone has said that they are damn sure that no one they know has ever had gay sex, just because someone believes that a man who has had gay sex should not teach young people in any situation, just because of all that, that doesn't make a person homophobic.

Though if someone had all those views you have to wonder why they can't handle the description of what that makes them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Begs a few question of Wolford: Do you believe that homosexuality is taught? Are gay men more likely to be paedophiles? Do your views apply to gay women too? Should young gay men and women be taught/spiritually guided by straight men and women? Are there any other sections of society who should be excluded from teaching?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the witch-hunters care to review my contributions to this thread they will see that I have reserved my comments about the suitability of gay people to tutor young adults to a single person and people who behave in a manner similar to his own. I know it suits you to make out that i have made generic comments about all homosexuals, but I haven't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the witch-hunters care to review my contributions to this thread they will see that I have reserved my comments about the suitability of gay people to tutor young adults to a single person and people who behave in a manner similar to his own. I know it suits you to make out that i have made generic comments about all homosexuals, but I haven't.

So your beef is with someone who has posted a swear word on a dating site? So this means they are unsuitable to work with young people? You are a sensitive soul.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the witch-hunters care to review my contributions to this thread they will see that I have reserved my comments about the suitability of gay people to tutor young adults to a single person and people who behave in a manner similar to his own. I know it suits you to make out that i have made generic comments about all homosexuals, but I haven't.

You repeatedly referred to consensual acts between two men as unnatural.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so would anal penetration between a consensual heterosexual couple be natural?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so would anal penetration between a consensual heterosexual couple be natural?

It wouldn't be natural for me.

Neither has any woman ever suggested to me that we do it that way.

If other people are consensual about indulging in the practice, well, what they do in private is their choice. It's certainly not a topic that would ever be discussed in my circle of friends and colleagues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so would anal penetration between a consensual heterosexual couple be natural?

Why not? Is vaginal penetration the only sex act that is considered natural?

BTW it is a common misconception that for gay men, sex means anal penetration. It could mean all manner of sex acts. In the same way that some heterosexual women don't like anal sex, neither do some homosexual men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be natural for me.

Neither has any woman ever suggested to me that we do it that way.

If other people are consensual about indulging in the practice, well, what they do in private is their choice. It's certainly not a topic that would ever be discussed in my circle of friends and colleagues.

Do you think it is unnatural that gay people may be attracted to members of the same sex?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think it is unnatural that gay people may be attracted to members of the same sex?

I think that most gay people are born with those tendencies; most straight people aren't. The problems arise with the very small number of teenage kids who are confused about their sexuality. They could make a mistake, or be exploited and the experience could haunt and scare them for the rest of their lives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - April 2017

League Express - Mon 10th April 2017