Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hindle xiii

Bulls news thread

159 posts in this topic

I actually think you are correct and there is zero chance the Bulls will be thrown out. On the other hand the Titanic was considered to be unsinkable.

I think that is fair comment, to be honest.

From what I've read of the conditions it doesn't really sound certain at all; the printed matter goes on about standards being met and complying to requirements etc and sounds very onerous. Which, given the circumstances, is fair enough I guess, after the problems, and anyway who knows what 'assurances' might have been given in private? Logically though, it wouldn't make any sense at all for the RFL and SL, to have gone to all the trouble of facilitating the take over, only to sink the new ship before it had done its maiden voyage.

It does seem that the RFL are going to keep an "on-going" check on the club, which I'd expect would obviate the necessity of the 'mini licensing round', affecting just the Bulls, at the end of this season. It is though all guesswork and assumptions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows what 'assurances' might have been given in private?

:D The movers and shakers are having their own little meetings agreeing things whilst we get fed "press releases".

The usual suspects were down at Toulouse earlier last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:D The movers and shakers are having their own little meetings agreeing things whilst we get fed "press releases".

The usual suspects were down at Toulouse earlier last year.

I can only imagine!!

It is difficult for the authorities to be fair; they try to help one 'down and out', only to be accused of ignoring another so they make public promises which can only be sanctioned by the agreement of several people - some of whom may not, in truth, be in total agrreement - and who knows what arm-twisting goes on in these meetings and what terms have to be included to keep clubs on-side with it.

I'm firmly under the impression that the terms, as written down on paper, are far more onerous than the 'realité' - but, of course, it's the officials who decide whether those terms have been met, so what they may have beeen told by these officials is probabaly more important than the written contract. If a written contract actually exists....Anyway, things seem to be moving along sweetly enough at the moment. B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:D The movers and shakers are having their own little meetings agreeing things whilst we get fed "press releases".

The usual suspects were down at Toulouse earlier last year.

What annoys me is that if the Toulouse licence comes off, it will be at the expense of an existing SL club.

I don;t know why any new SL club like Toulouse cannot be allowed in and all clubs cut their cloth so that no team is removed and they all operate with a bit less.

Or Toulouse could be let in and not have an initial share in the Sky money. However that was tried with Gateshead and I am sure that was a factor in their eventual demise, that and the old boys club looking after Hull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We can't let the game stagnate any further by reshuffling the sae old pack.

We need a new injection of fans, money and interest. Good luck to Toulouse

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We can't let the game stagnate any further by reshuffling the sae old pack.

We need a new injection of fans, money and interest. Good luck to Toulouse

So what are you saying, dump Widnes or Wakefield or Castleford or Hull Kr or London or Salford. I have nothing against Toulouse, but it would seem crazy to dump an existing team, a British one at that for another French team who are not attractive to advertisers or whom do not contribute much to clubs coffers from gate receipts.

Better to keep them all plus Toulouse and exist on a little smaller salary level for those who cannot meet the present cap without spending every penny and then some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What annoys me is that if the Toulouse licence comes off, it will be at the expense of an existing SL club.

If it happens it will be a club who can offer more to the game replacing a club who offers less.

That's been the whole principle of licensing.

But before you start that's the same principle as P & R - remove a club who are losers with one who are winners.

So I don't understand your point one little bit.

By all means call for a 16 club SL, but don't criticise something that's only the same as the P & R you favour

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bulls won't be replaced by a Championship Club.

Never mind the polictics of it all, if the Bulls have sold 6500 season tickets at full price then they will not be threatened.

Halifax, Featherstone or Leigh will struggle to get 6500 season tickets between them.

It wouldn't surprise me to see the Bulls gates exceed those three with their crowds combined.

One SL club or maybe two could be threatened by Toulouse but that's a different matter altogether.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bulls won't be replaced by a Championship Club.

Never mind the polictics of it all, if the Bulls have sold 6500 season tickets at full price then they will not be threatened.

Halifax, Featherstone or Leigh will struggle to get 6500 season tickets between them.

It wouldn't surprise me to see the Bulls gates exceed those three with their crowds combined.

Blimey :O You in a mood?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what are you saying, dump Widnes or Wakefield or Castleford or Hull Kr or London or Salford. I have nothing against Toulouse, but it would seem crazy to dump an existing team, a British one at that for another French team who are not attractive to advertisers or whom do not contribute much to clubs coffers from gate receipts.

Better to keep them all plus Toulouse and exist on a little smaller salary level for those who cannot meet the present cap without spending every penny and then some.

To tell the truth, though I am Bradford through and through and have gone home and away since 1975, I wouldn't mind it if we merged with Huddersfield and/or Halifax to free up a Superleague spot for a team with major potential. I'd certainly rather merge than be ripped off by Bradford City.

Obviously, I would object to merging with Leeds, but then so would everybody else.

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To tell the truth, though I am Bradford through and through and have gone home and away since 1975, I wouldn't mind it if we merged with Huddersfield and/or Halifax to free up a Superleague spot for a team with major potential. I'd certainly rather merge than be ripped off by Bradford City.

Obviously, I would object to merging with Leeds, but then so would everybody else.

;)

Now I find that strange. I only followed the Bulls (Northern) when I moved to the city in '93 and so have only really known the rivalry with Leeds - I was aware of the Halifax one, but it rarely seemed to manifest itself.

However, everything I have been led to believe is that Halifax is the traditional rivalry and Leeds is Johnny-come-lately one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, Halifax were always a rival but not the rival. Over the years, I have often been to watch them midweek or when the Bulls have not been playing. I have never done the same for Huddersfield or Keighley.

Both Thrum Hall and the Shay have been great RL venues and offered terrific fan atmosheres.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I find that strange. I only followed the Bulls (Northern) when I moved to the city in '93 and so have only really known the rivalry with Leeds - I was aware of the Halifax one, but it rarely seemed to manifest itself.

However, everything I have been led to believe is that Halifax is the traditional rivalry and Leeds is Johnny-come-lately one.

I guess all local rivals are 'derbies' but Leeds is the only real one for most I'd say. Maybe it depends which side of the city you come from? From the western, Buttershaw end, you might think a bit more of the Fax game I dunno. Then I've always quite liked Fax as a club ('cept when we play them, of course) also Keighley though they always seem to dislike us for some reason. In fact some Cougar fans seem to get wound up when I don't hate them back!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess all local rivals are 'derbies' but Leeds is the only real one for most I'd say. Maybe it depends which side of the city you come from? From the western, Buttershaw end, you might think a bit more of the Fax game I dunno. Then I've always quite liked Fax as a club ('cept when we play them, of course) also Keighley though they always seem to dislike us for some reason. In fact some Cougar fans seem to get wound up when I don't hate them back!

That's nothing to do with rugby. Keighley hate Bradford full stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SL needs the bulls, this is more god news ahead of the new season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's nothing to do with rugby. Keighley hate Bradford full stop.

I think there is a certain antipathy towards the council but they're unlikely to get much of an argument from the rest of us about that either, to be honest.. B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12:00 kickoff on Saturday. Game finished by 14:00. Train to London at 15:00. King's Cross by 18:00.

Either that or play the game on Thursday or Monday. If there's people wanting to make a weekend of it at Wembley, they may well be wanting to go straight from work on Friday night anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12:00 kickoff on Saturday. Game finished by 14:00. Train to London at 15:00. King's Cross by 18:00.

Either that or play the game on Thursday or Monday. If there's people wanting to make a weekend of it at Wembley, they may well be wanting to go straight from work on Friday night anyway

I know my bro has an overnight travel package, he may have told me the details but I've forgotten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, Halifax were always a rival but not the rival. Over the years, I have often been to watch them midweek or when the Bulls have not been playing.

Just seen the Fax squad for 2013. I think they'll do well and I'll make the effort to go and see them a few times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the RFL are right on this one. Shouldn't clash with WCC. Saturday would seem a reasonable compromise.

I agree it shouldn't. And my preference would be Saturday. However if the club deem it to be financially damaging then they should plead their case further. As mentioned before, it's only this freak occurance which has forced the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyhoo, whenever the game is played, put all your money on Saints... I can't help think we'll be on the end of a hiding that particular game, as a gentle reminder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - April 2017

League Express - Mon 10th April 2017