Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Barnie

what do you really want?

79 posts in this topic

PhillH,

I have never seen anyone write such inflammatory nonsense for the apparent sake of it.

We all want the same thing in essence but you appear to live in a utopian world where whatever you wish for comes true. You obviously cannot compare Leigh and what happened there to us or we would be in exactly the same position. People are different so owners of clubs are different, local councils are different. We can aspire to be the very best but reality dictates we are limited to what we have and the funds/means available at the time.

We could go it alone and leave the Warrington angle out of the equation but I guarantee the same whiners would be on here complaining we were in the lower echelons with no ambition.

What do you want that is genuinely attainable given the present management, funds and support? And I mean what can you suggest be done, not what we all imagine could be done given an infinite amount of time and funds. Give me examples and tell us all what you have done to progress them outside of this forum.

I hope you have a page full because I really want to believe you are not just a whingeing know all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look upon the idea of partnerships as "a waste" if you so wish, but to my way of thinking there is plenty of potential for well thought out initiatives to deliver very worthwhile benefits directly relevent to the needs of the local area and therefore be "money well spent". Plus there is a huge amount of evidence from other areas to show positive outcomes can be achieved when these things are done well. Now who's being the pessimist?

If Dr Koukash completes his buyout of Salford City Council's share in the Salford City Stadium next week it ought to equate to roughly a £20-25m unplanned windfall to council coffers, perhaps just a modest slice of that could be made available to at least do some early facilitating and also level the playing field between the support given to the two local sides. Just a thought.

Perhaps you could ask Trevor Barton how many people told him LSV would never happen. The only problem is likely to be that by about 2007 he lost count. Were you a Doubting Thomas? If so, he proved you wrong! Now LSV is up and running, do you think the venture was/is wasteful? Perhaps more importantly - do you think the people of Leigh view it as having been a waste?

We have two multi £million public sector building projects currently ongoing in the Borough - the new Moorside High School and the new St Ambrose High School (shortly to be expanded to accomodate pupils from St George's in Walkden). Plus another huge development that involves the private sector on former NHS land at "Nightingale Gardens" aka the former Children's Hospital. The landscape is being changed, some things are still possible. There has to be room for vision and good ideas and progress, even when times are in some ways hard.

I did not say that it is "Warrington A or bust". What I did say is that there has to be a limit on how far the concept of a partnership can be taken. Interesting that you have used the phrase "merger" - the ultimate extent and perish the thought, surely? What we don't currently have is a clear and realistic vision of a better future for Swinton RLFC in its own right, within which there should be a defined but restricted roll for the relationship with Warrington to play a positive part. Hopefully the end goal IS NOT a "merger".

"Why can't we just go back to how it was before?" Because if you keep doing what you have always done, you will keep getting what you have always got. And according to you, that's not very much. The question I ask is: Why can't things be BETTER than how it was before?

our overriding sentiment appears to be, "We are rubbish, have pretty much always been rubbish, and there is no realistic way we will ever cease being rubbish". And you call that OPTIMISM?

That reply is pure nonsense.

I cannot even find the enthusiasm to reply. Its laughable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

super league clubs cant even get it right phil, watch inside out tonight 7.30pm bbc1 if they cant get it right what hope have we got?.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No no no Julian...you and Phil are the optimists!

Ive been spun so comprehensively that I am the doubting Thomas

Super league is great. All the clubs are in the black. Theres an endless supply of money even though first time buyers cant even secure a mortgage and we run out of ambulances about an hour into every day.

I say again just in case no one heard me first time. Agecroft will never be built. The "merger" with Warrington is rubbish. John Kidd never did owt for Swinton. "DR" Koukash is not only a real doctor but hes as rich as John Whittaker,and Philh was born with the ability to smile he just chooses not to.

Ps Dale Cunniffe was rubbish.

I plan to repeat this every week after every game until we all agree.

We are all doomed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark, I preferred it when you referred to him as Ming.

I sincerely hope that in your future posts you refer to him as Ming as it shines a light in my otherwise tedious life. I am, after all, a Swinton fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark,

I think you need a holiday lol, I am there for you if you need a break.

My son is on for a first in BSc Computer Science and he says forums are the cess pit of the Internet.

It would be boring if we agreed.......ever!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark,

I think you need a holiday lol, I am there for you if you need a break.

My son is on for a first in BSc Computer Science and he says forums are the cess pit of the Internet.

It would be boring if we agreed.......ever!

to be fair i dont think you need any form of qualification to come to that conclusion. its a load of victor meldrews giving their take on rugby league with the majority of opinions being shot down in smoke by other budding victors! (of which i count myself in that description)

and thats why i love and hate this forum in equal measures!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark,

Many thanks, I get better with age. All brains from mum.

Barnie,

Victor Meldrew was happy go lucky compared with this cheery lot lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to be fair i dont think you need any form of qualification to come to that conclusion. its a load of victor meldrews giving their take on rugby league with the majority of opinions being shot down in smoke by other budding victors! (of which i count myself in that description)

and thats why i love and hate this forum in equal measures!

No barnie you're wrong

Ha ha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark,

Many thanks, I get better with age. All brains from mum.

Barnie,

Victor Meldrew was happy go lucky compared with this cheery lot lol.

Yes my dads a bright chap sometimes. . Just think though that if your mum and my dad are the bright ones wtf are we swinton fans?? They're to blame!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PhillH,

I have never seen anyone write such inflammatory nonsense for the apparent sake of it.

We all want the same thing in essence but you appear to live in a utopian world where whatever you wish for comes true. You obviously cannot compare Leigh and what happened there to us or we would be in exactly the same position. People are different so owners of clubs are different, local councils are different. We can aspire to be the very best but reality dictates we are limited to what we have and the funds/means available at the time.

We could go it alone and leave the Warrington angle out of the equation but I guarantee the same whiners would be on here complaining we were in the lower echelons with no ambition.

What do you want that is genuinely attainable given the present management, funds and support? And I mean what can you suggest be done, not what we all imagine could be done given an infinite amount of time and funds. Give me examples and tell us all what you have done to progress them outside of this forum.

I hope you have a page full because I really want to believe you are not just a whingeing know all.

Clearly the first thing is the new ground. I believe it would help the chances of a good outcome if the whole project were opened up. That is a lesson worth taking on board from what wasn't done well at Barton but was done well at Leigh. Get supportive people on board on a broader basis. It will help in the long run and generate interest too.

There's a lot of value in doing a comparison with other areas and other projects. Starting with the numerous stadiums that have either been built from new / totally redeveloped / in the planning in recent years. There is a seriously big portfolio; varying sizes, varying sports, with varying degrees of success - all sorts of positive things that could be replicated and mistakes best avoided. Of course the solution needs tailoring to the local circumstances, but fundamentally if the likes of Dewsbury, York, Batley (Mount Pleasant is now truly a lovely ground), FC United, etc etc etc have been able to do something good, we should be asking why can't Swinton also do something good? Our community definitely has the talent within it. We were tenants at the very modest Park Lane long enough - hardly an architectural icon - I used to look around bemused why it wasn't possible to at least replicate it inside M27, at least then you'd have a foothold to start from....

A key objective being: Make the council really want the club playing back in the area. That unlocks resources and makes life a lot easier. Plus a lot of what is needed to achieve that objective is stage management and doesn't really cost anything. John Wilkinson was a past master at it.

The next tier of work should be an openly available strategy of marketing and community development work intended to target an identified audience of people to boost the club's profile, make it relevant and attract the new generations of support plus hopefully attract sponsors. Some of this could begin pronto. Could include things similar to the youth team tournament that preceded Ian Watson's testimonial - why not repeat the exercise on a periodic basis throughout the season? Work with the schools to get kids involved and the parents come along too - hold events on matchday. Help local companies deliver their corporate responsibility agenda - an obvious big target at the moment being ASDA.

Partnerships are needed with as many local stakeholders as possible - a good starting point would be to get a visible Community Development Officer in post and get that person to every meeting of the Swinton Community Committee, start to build relationships with local NGOs, schools, health services, sports clubs, council officers. Be seen. Understand current issues. Explore common objectives. Explore funding opportunities, likely to be a combination of both grants and sponsorships.

I've done more than my fair share of campaigning on this issue with the powers that be over the years, a proportion of which the board moderator is aware of as he also made a contribution to the M27 Sports and Community Project several years back. One of the things that ought to be fixed and would cost nothing is to re-establish a functioning framework through which the Supporters Trust could be engaged at strategic level. That firstly needs the Trust to get its board position and share holding back. Energise some volunteers in the right way and a lot more things would be possible without much of an outlay.

For example the Mayor is on the record as being a stated fan of Supporters Trusts, something he showed by deed when agreeing to be the Honorary President of M27SCP when acting as the MP for Eccles and it came up again surrounding the problems at Salford City Reds. He opened a few doors back then and has even more power to his elbow now. Engage him in the right way and there is every reason to believe that some worthwhile advice and opportunities would result again, which could only help the chances of getting Agecroft up and running and off to a good start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you gave me the page lol.

All great ideas that I wouldn't argue against but you miss my overall point. For whatever reason be it financial, time or drive these common sense ideas are not being developed...that I know of......therefore whilst I appreciate the matter needs raising, maybe not on pretty much every thread and not stoking up nonsensical arguments when bottom line is we all agree on the fundamentals.

I don't know if you appreciate the fact that most who have a pop at your posts do so out of frustration as opposed to a complete aversion to the majority of your ideas. The problem is ideas cost nothing and its easy to knock people for not taking up ideas, even when they are common sense. We don't know their reasons and should cut them some slack...the club is still functioning and even if not always to your liking, are striving to achieve the best they can on the field with what is available. Maybe a sticky be created with fans genuine ideas of what can be improved and how......I'm sure club officials and players look at the forum at some point and they could check out an ideas thread without getting caught up in bickering?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets sum up the pros ond cons on this topic it seems the pros are Warrington help us out with players and training facility's the cons our own players get pushed threw the door the kids don't have to spend any money from there T.V money on players we will lose our identity we will never get a new stadium and will soon be playing our games at Warrington we might as well jump into bed with Salford and become there feeder club and play our games there it's a JOKE we need to be SWINTON and have our own players our own identity our own ground the club owners will have to stand up and be counted for the sake of SWINTON LIONS or sit back and be swallowed up by super league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We all know what we want. I'm just going outside to shake the funds from my money tree. Won't be long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we don't have any Money to get our own players nobody pays to watch us no TV money no money from R.F.L. Oh well lets beg Warrington for players then the powers that be won,t have. To spend any of this money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets sum up the pros ond cons on this topic it seems the pros are Warrington help us out with players and training facility's the cons our own players get pushed threw the door the kids don't have to spend any money from there T.V money on players we will lose our identity we will never get a new stadium and will soon be playing our games at Warrington we might as well jump into bed with Salford and become there feeder club and play our games there it's a JOKE we need to be SWINTON and have our own players our own identity our own ground the club owners will have to stand up and be counted for the sake of SWINTON LIONS or sit back and be swallowed up by super league

Yeah the kidds are making a fortune. I'll add that to my earlier list!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently the RFL have some rules in place with regard to the dual reg system that will help protect the integrity of the competition.Found this on another forum.Just to clarify some of the concerns within this thread. What people may not be aware if is that the RFL have produced a whole list of governance procedures, restrictions and criteria regarding the dual reg arrangements - particularly around salary cap and numbers of games permitted.

Each player has been given a notional value by the RFL (Governed by their parent Club actual salary). So anytime a player (with the exception of U21s) plays on dual reg, the dual reg receiving club has to absorb the players notional value on to their salary cap returns. Thus intending to prevent a glut of top players playing week in week out.

Also, there is a restriction on players being involved in the latter stages of the competition. The player has to have played a defined number of games to be able to play in the last eight weeks of competition - up to the play offs.

These, along with other measures will go a long way to protecting the integrity of the competition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting quote from last nights inside story was that people have been predicting rugby leagues demise since the 1890s.

The cumulative debt in super league being around £70million.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we don't have any Money to get our own players nobody pays to watch us no TV money no money from R.F.L. Oh well lets beg Warrington for players then the powers that be won,t have. To spend any of this money

i take it you've not been to any of the meetings that have been held by the club recently. this vitriolic diatribe is ridiculous at best.

we are playing by the rules set out. if you dont like it dont watch Swinton. simples.

i hear there is a game called soccer or something like that. try giving that a watch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moving on slightly - we may see Phil Joseph lining up for Workington on Sunday I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently the RFL have some rules in place with regard to the dual reg system that will help protect the integrity of the competition.Found this on another forum.Just to clarify some of the concerns within this thread. What people may not be aware if is that the RFL have produced a whole list of governance procedures, restrictions and criteria regarding the dual reg arrangements - particularly around salary cap and numbers of games permitted.

Each player has been given a notional value by the RFL (Governed by their parent Club actual salary). So anytime a player (with the exception of U21s) plays on dual reg, the dual reg receiving club has to absorb the players notional value on to their salary cap returns. Thus intending to prevent a glut of top players playing week in week out.

Also, there is a restriction on players being involved in the latter stages of the competition. The player has to have played a defined number of games to be able to play in the last eight weeks of competition - up to the play offs.

These, along with other measures will go a long way to protecting the integrity of the competition.

Just to add to your post some figures that will be used:-

A SL player on salary of £100k+ adds - £1,500 per match to the Championship clubs salary cap total

A SL player on salary of £60k - £99,999 adds - £1,000 per match

A SL player on salary of £40k - £59,999 adds - £750 per match

A SL player on salary of £20k - £39,999 adds - £500 per match

A SL player on salary of Under £20k adds - Actual costs incurred.

It doesn't matter if the Championship club doesn't have to pay a penny towards the SL player it still counts on that clubs salary cap total.

The other point is that just the same as last year dual reg players have to play a certain percentage of qualifying games throughout the season to be able to play in the Championship play-offs, so a club can't just bring in top player at the end of the season.

Only clubs that are linked can use the dual registering process. Clubs not so linked can still loan players for a minimum of 28 days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting quote from last nights inside story was that people have been predicting rugby leagues demise since the 1890s.

The cumulative debt in super league being around £70million.

See link below from BBC Sport website. Is this what you mean?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/21211330

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets sum up the pros ond cons on this topic it seems the pros are Warrington help us out with players and training facility's the cons our own players get pushed threw the door the kids don't have to spend any money from there T.V money on players we will lose our identity we will never get a new stadium and will soon be playing our games at Warrington we might as well jump into bed with Salford and become there feeder club and play our games there it's a JOKE we need to be SWINTON and have our own players our own identity our own ground the club owners will have to stand up and be counted for the sake of SWINTON LIONS or sit back and be swallowed up by super league

Ive been trying to get my point across about the size of swintons squad for a while now,i worry at why swinton have only been able to recruit 17 players is it by choice or is there other reasons why players won't come to swinton.Most champ clubs have 20/25 squad players plus dr players, i think the size of the squad could have a big impact on swintons season ( hope im wrong ). I think this sunday will be a good indication as to how swinton will go, workington having only just come up.

Good luck for the season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - April 2017

League Express - Mon 10th April 2017