Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

guess who

Kylie Leuluai and Richard Moore in Hunslets squad to face Leigh on sunday.

84 posts in this topic

That's nice. But sending a Hull KR junior or 5 up to Barrow on a wet and windy Thursday night is a bit much.

Looking by the names which are circulating 2 games in I don't think this arrangment is focusing on youth in the slightest.

I'd be happy to have a couple of HKR youngsters on loan for the season if it benefited our squad mind you, they do seem to have a couple of good young players knocking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HKR already have a link up with Gateshead Thunder but seeing as Barrow is in Cumbria then any SL club could link with them as the SL clubs second linked team. All SL clubs can have two linked clubs providing the second club is in one of the areas nominated, i.e. Wales, South West, Midlands, Cumbria, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Parky, but I think having their wages bill cut by around a third might have been a major factor in their decision.

How does this work Terry??

It was said that SL clubs would save £100K a year "using" CC clubs. It was also said that if Hunslet use say Hood and Kleinhorst all year their wages will be paid by Leeds in full, but erm "a sum would be set against Hunslet's salary cap of £300K".

I assume that we don't spend anywhere near that. Maybe we can afford say £120K. If Leeds want to shower us with players there'll be a limit based on the theoretical value of the players in which once we have £180K's worth of Leeds players we can have no more Leeds players.

But how will we "save a third in wages" unless we cut our own input down allowing Leeds to pay for as many players as we can get? I suppose it's a good thing if CC clubs can use this to cut their input into the wages bill down to what they can afford. It helps them survive.

Thinking about it to control finance Leeds would have to look at what Hunslet are making and ensure that revenue goes towards the team so that Hunslet aren't making a profit from Leeds?? Looks to me like it's not just sharing players but finances.

ANYWAY

Hunslet.v.Barrow 2011 attendance 500

Hunslet.v.Barrow 2013 attendance 500

Doesn't look like it's having any effect on the fans, but it does have a financial advantage for both clubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being reported on twitter that Kylie can not play for Hunslet due to the terms of his visa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being reported on twitter that Kylie can not play for Hunslet due to the terms of his visa.

T&A reported he'd taken British citizenship, which is why he could play. I haven't taken it as gospel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T&A reported he'd taken British citizenship, which is why he could play. I haven't taken it as gospel.

Peter Smith Yorkshire Post Leeds correspondent has tweeded it so I would say it is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this work Terry??

It was said that SL clubs would save £100K a year "using" CC clubs. It was also said that if Hunslet use say Hood and Kleinhorst all year their wages will be paid by Leeds in full, but erm "a sum would be set against Hunslet's salary cap of £300K".

I assume that we don't spend anywhere near that. Maybe we can afford say £120K. If Leeds want to shower us with players there'll be a limit based on the theoretical value of the players in which once we have £180K's worth of Leeds players we can have no more Leeds players.

But how will we "save a third in wages" unless we cut our own input down allowing Leeds to pay for as many players as we can get? I suppose it's a good thing if CC clubs can use this to cut their input into the wages bill down to what they can afford. It helps them survive.

Thinking about it to control finance Leeds would have to look at what Hunslet are making and ensure that revenue goes towards the team so that Hunslet aren't making a profit from Leeds?? Looks to me like it's not just sharing players but finances.

ANYWAY

Hunslet.v.Barrow 2011 attendance 500

Hunslet.v.Barrow 2013 attendance 500

Doesn't look like it's having any effect on the fans, but it does have a financial advantage for both clubs.

If the salary cap is a straight £300k with no rider on turnover, and Hunslet have £180k of 'spare' cap they could in theory play 3 players earing over £100kpa and 2 on 60-100kpa in every league game and not break the cap and it wouldn't actually cost them a penny.

The fact that high earmners had a value placed on them at the outset tells me that this 'scheme' was never intended to be for bringing on the juniors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the salary cap is a straight £300k with no rider on turnover, and Hunslet have £180k of 'spare' cap they could in theory play 3 players earing over £100kpa and 2 on 60-100kpa in every league game and not break the cap and it wouldn't actually cost them a penny.

The fact that high earmners had a value placed on them at the outset tells me that this 'scheme' was never intended to be for bringing on the juniors.

Thanks for that. The attempt to play Leuluai and Moore is clearly using Hunslet as an "A" team.

What I am unsure about is just how far this can go and whether it can affect the independent clubs.

Powell and Aston were worried about such as Hunslet having a couple of SL players in their ranks on the cheap, but I don't think Hunslet will be any threat to Featherstone or Sheffield in that situation.

The situation that could evolve is the maximisation of SL players by such as Leeds into the Hunslet team.

The cap is a constraint as is the number of players Leeds could release to play for Hunslet.

But the day that "A" teams start beating independant ambitious teams will be a significant one. But can this happen?

It may be these "A" teams remain cannon fodder for Rovers and Eagles in which you can go on to sit on the shoulder of SL until they let you in. But if they end up blocking the queue for SL???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. The attempt to play Leuluai and Moore is clearly using Hunslet as an "A" team.

What I am unsure about is just how far this can go and whether it can affect the independent clubs.

Powell and Aston were worried about such as Hunslet having a couple of SL players in their ranks on the cheap, but I don't think Hunslet will be any threat to Featherstone or Sheffield in that situation.

The situation that could evolve is the maximisation of SL players by such as Leeds into the Hunslet team.

The cap is a constraint as is the number of players Leeds could release to play for Hunslet.

But the day that "A" teams start beating independant ambitious teams will be a significant one. But can this happen?

It may be these "A" teams remain cannon fodder for Rovers and Eagles in which you can go on to sit on the shoulder of SL until they let you in. But if they end up blocking the queue for SL???

If I understand your last phrase..........

Another way of looking at this is : Are the top clubs in SL looking to create a barrier to SL entry by stacking Swinton, Dewsbury and Hunslet with SL squad players so that they block the likes of Fev and Halifax from winning the Championship and the NR Cup, thereby not being able to apply for SL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? Are you putting up roadblocks?

Fans travel miles to see clubs, why do you go against all logic and reason and state with no evidence at all that the good people of Keighley and district will not be attracted to Superleague and the Bulls.

Because I grew up there and I know. They will go to Burnley football before they go to Osdsal. The town will be lost to RL if the Cougars die.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I understand your last phrase..........

Another way of looking at this is : Are the top clubs in SL looking to create a barrier to SL entry by stacking Swinton, Dewsbury and Hunslet with SL squad players so that they block the likes of Fev and Halifax from winning the Championship and the NR Cup, thereby not being able to apply for SL?

I think we all love a conspiracy theory Shaun.

I think SL clubs would love to cement their positions in SL forever, and would welcome obtaining the resources of their local CC clubs for themselves. Wigan would probably like a couple of thousand more fans and the LSV as their second team home, with the kids from Leigh miners and rangers all busting a gut to play for Wigan one day.

Leeds are well on the way to securing SLS as their second team ground, the locals mainly watch Leeds and the best kids bust a gut to play for Leeds, McShane was educated a drop kick from both Parkside and SLS.

An intentional ploy to keep Leigh, Fev and Fax out?

I should not think so Leigh and Fax suffer from the size of their local rivals. Featherstone are a different kettle of fish, but if they could become the big club the (Lower)Calder area needs then I'm sure SL would want them to get on with it ASAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because I grew up there and I know. They will go to Burnley football before they go to Osdsal. The town will be lost to RL if the Cougars die.

We've heard this for years that RL will die if the local championship club goes under.

They said all the Rugby fans in east hull would go to Hull City if there was no HKR.

The old men may not be able to change their ways but Bradford Bulls will be loking to the new generations of fans in keighley and guess what - you DON'T know any of them.......

The reality is that Leeds captured the south Leeds market, and cosying up to Hunslet will complete the process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An intentional ploy to keep Leigh, Fev and Fax out?

I should not think so Leigh and Fax suffer from the size of their local rivals. Featherstone are a different kettle of fish, but if they could become the big club the (Lower)Calder area needs then I'm sure SL would want them to get on with it ASAP.

The area of Calderdale is more than big enough for Fax not to be bothered about Huddersfield or Bradford.

Whether or not they do anything to try and attract people to watch the games in their numbers, is a different matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've heard this for years that RL will die if the local championship club goes under.

They said all the Rugby fans in east hull would go to Hull City if there was no HKR.

The old men may not be able to change their ways but Bradford Bulls will be loking to the new generations of fans in keighley and guess what - you DON'T know any of them.......

The reality is that Leeds captured the south Leeds market, and cosying up to Hunslet will complete the process.

News flash. There are very few new generations of RL fans in Keighley. The last time Keighley attracted the youth, the future fans was in the Cougarmania era. Hunslet, I can't speak for because I don't know. Keighley is a depressed town. There is not a lot of money kicking around. Any fans, young or old, who are there are not likely to spend the money to get to Bradford, pay SL admission prices, nevermind that there is an antipathy to all things Bradford from politics to sport within the town.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what explains the fairly high number of Keighley people who go to Bradford City? They won't pay SL prices but they will pay football prices?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've heard this for years that RL will die if the local championship club goes under.

They said all the Rugby fans in east hull would go to Hull City if there was no HKR.

The old men may not be able to change their ways but Bradford Bulls will be loking to the new generations of fans in keighley and guess what - you DON'T know any of them.......

The reality is that Leeds captured the south Leeds market, and cosying up to Hunslet will complete the process.

Come on Phil, They dont need to cosy with us or parter with us secure the South Leeds market, they secured this along time ago, i tell you the year 1999! That year basically killed any chance of Hunslet regaining South Leeds as its own, i remember the years from 1995 to 1999 well, we were on the crest of a wave, a bit like Fev are now, we won two league titles and played at Wembley, we were averaging nearly 2000 supporters a game (more than we get in 5 games now), we had ex GB international in our team, were brining through great youngsters like Richard Baker Jamie Thackray etc, we had a player pathway, you would see people in the clubs and pubs, walking around South Leeds in Hunslet tops.The day the RFL blocked us, that was it. Thats the year South Leeds was lost to Hunslet forever.

And its the same issue which has pushed 90% of Championship clubs into these dual reg partnerships, what is it, its simple, A CLOSED SHOP FOR SUPER LEAGUE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what explains the fairly high number of Keighley people who go to Bradford City? They won't pay SL prices but they will pay football prices?

Do you have any figures on that and i mean for league games not the massive public interest League Cup games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any figures on that and i mean for league games not the massive public interest League Cup games.

Of course not but there are quite a few that go regardless of the current cup run. And even then I bet a fair few are going to Wembley.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. The attempt to play Leuluai and Moore is clearly using Hunslet as an "A" team.

What I am unsure about is just how far this can go and whether it can affect the independent clubs.

Powell and Aston were worried about such as Hunslet having a couple of SL players in their ranks on the cheap, but I don't think Hunslet will be any threat to Featherstone or Sheffield in that situation.

The situation that could evolve is the maximisation of SL players by such as Leeds into the Hunslet team.

The cap is a constraint as is the number of players Leeds could release to play for Hunslet.

But the day that "A" teams start beating independant ambitious teams will be a significant one. But can this happen?

It may be these "A" teams remain cannon fodder for Rovers and Eagles in which you can go on to sit on the shoulder of SL until they let you in. But if they end up blocking the queue for SL???

There is an argument that with the bottom clubs in the championship having access to some super league fringe players, they will provide better competition to the likes of Fev, Fax & Sheffield and therefore actually make those clubs better prepared for super league.

It's a pretty grim opinion of the tops clubs in the championship if people really think that over the course of a season they couldn't compete very well against some of the bottom clubs, simply because they have access to some super league fringe players on a week by week basis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an argument that with the bottom clubs in the championship having access to some super league fringe players, they will provide better competition to the likes of Fev, Fax & Sheffield and therefore actually make those clubs better prepared for super league.

It's a pretty grim opinion of the tops clubs in the championship if people really think that over the course of a season they couldn't compete very well against some of the bottom clubs, simply because they have access to some super league fringe players on a week by week basis.

It might not be at the top where the problems arise. Maybe a team will be relegated who previously wouldn't deserve to go down because of the use of established SL players to help win games against other relegation rivals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It might not be at the top where the problems arise. Maybe a team will be relegated who previously wouldn't deserve to go down because of the use of established SL players to help win games against other relegation rivals.

But isn't that the same for all clubs? All those who think they might get relegated, could (if they choose) link with a SL club, and then it's up to them to do a good deal with their SL link. Those who get the best deals will do best, same as those championship clubs who recruit best generally, or have the best links with their local community clubs will tend to do better.

If I were a Hunslet or Gloucester fan, I'd be well chuffed that my club had linked with Leeds, probably the best club in the game. If I were a Doncaster fan, I'd be less excited about the link with Wakey, might get one or two half-decent fringe players, but unlikely to get anything else that will help shape Doncaster as a club for years to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But isn't that the same for all clubs? All those who think they might get relegated, could (if they choose) link with a SL club, and then it's up to them to do a good deal with their SL link. Those who get the best deals will do best, same as those championship clubs who recruit best generally, or have the best links with their local community clubs will tend to do better.

If I were a Hunslet or Gloucester fan, I'd be well chuffed that my club had linked with Leeds, probably the best club in the game. If I were a Doncaster fan, I'd be less excited about the link with Wakey, might get one or two half-decent fringe players, but unlikely to get anything else that will help shape Doncaster as a club for years to come.

SL teams can only link with one CC club so once the "best club in the game" have made a link then it's only an inferior team after that. So what you are saying is that it's all about getting your link sorted sooner rather than later so you get best dibs on a SL club. Congrats to Hunslet. The link ups have been abused so IMO it doesn't matter who you link up with the integrity of the CC has been compromised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SL teams can only link with one CC club so once the "best club in the game" have made a link then it's only an inferior team after that. So what you are saying is that it's all about getting your link sorted sooner rather than later so you get best dibs on a SL club. Congrats to Hunslet. The link ups have been abused so IMO it doesn't matter who you link up with the integrity of the CC has been compromised.

Certainly an element of first come, first served for sure, and location has an impact too. But these things work in lots of different ways. For example Dewsbury have benefited for many years by picking up lads from Wakey who can't quite make the grade at SL level, whereas Workington & Whitehaven have had access to lots of quality Cumbrian players, because it's not worth it for them to travel to other championships clubs.

I'm pretty sure we'll still see the best clubs at the top and the worst clubs down the bottom, come the end of the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure we'll still see the best clubs at the top and the worst clubs down the bottom, come the end of the season.

Time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time will tell.

The common purpose of the move is to prevent relegation from the Championship to the third tier where the fixture list will be (with respect) unattractive to what fans clubs will have left, and gates for such as Hunslet could end up averaging under 200 and then that would be that for the club.

So many of the tie up clubs are looking downwards or over their shoulders. The ones looking to SL were worried dual reg that went too far would knock them off their perch where they are waiting for a chance to get in SL.

The idea stronger CC clubs will better prepare top CC clubs for SL is a non starter. It's a semi pro/"A" team league.

The tie ups in Leeds Bradford and Wakefield look to me like one hope is the SL club will start to draw fans from their tie up areas. If your a family in Donny trying RL for the first time at the keepmoat, you may after realising Donny are just a junior partner to wakefield decide to go for Superleague...

Leeds already chase all the RL fans in south leeds and get most of them. There are several thousand people in Doncaster who have in the past paid to watch RL when the Dons were doing well, Wakefeld would love to get them coming up the donny Road. Bradford already park the season ticket bus in Batley. Now it'll start parking up in Dewsbury as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.