Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Daddy

Rugby League in the UK has become insular and self absorbed

59 posts in this topic

Why do you always look for and comment on our clubs failures instead of our clubs positives? Once a capper always a capper but in your case that doesn't mean a thing to you does it? (A true capper I think not). The BOD we have got now is probably the best BOD we have ever had and all you can do is knock our club.( that club you used to support may I add).

 

 

Why do you always look for and comment on our clubs failures instead of our clubs positives? Once a capper always a capper but in your case that doesn't mean a thing to you does it? (A true capper I think not). The BOD we have got now is probably the best BOD we have ever had and all you can do is knock our club.( that club you used to support may I add).

I do no such thing: open your other eye

I have never criticised the current regime at the club some of them are good friends of mine

 

no the capper shtick doesn't apply to me: some things are more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly don't see how the business model for this split leagues thing can work. It's a bit like a schools grading system to try and get competitive games. As I've said on another thread, I don't think that there is the playing depth for more than 10 teams at the top level, I think the financial kid match will make the middle lot just daft. For once I agree with tony smith

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot on, whoever decided to wire the mic up that was in front of Mullaney to the speakers really made a blunder.

Haha, like it Larry. There were times when I wished it hadn't been wired up as well let me tell you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it could have been worse: the club would have been stuck with a death trap like castleford's

 

I'm no expert on these things, but I am amazed that it gets a safety certificate.  Like I said though, I'm not expert on fire risk/structures.

 

I remember the West stand a Belle Vue, it can't have been any worse than the stand at Castleford but it came down pretty sharpish after the fire at Valley Parade.  It was also a fine piece of architecture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to help you out here.

 

At the time in question Wakefield were forced to pull down their main stand ,which for those that don't know was along the touchline where those few portacabins are now.

 

Where the benidorm flats now stand there was  a large terraced bank with a good covered stand. The dimensions were very simillar to what still exists at the other end of the pitch. They were forced to remove all of this.

 

They also had a decent set of floodlights on 8 pylons (4 down eac side) these were at the back of the stands behind the spectators. These were probably some of the newest in the league at the time. However they also had to demolish these and replace them with the present ones.

 

This came as a masive blow to the club and it is still feeling the effects today.

 

However the same local authority that forced these demands onto Wakefield completely ignored the wooden main stand at castleford and their much older floodlights were also allowed to remain. Health and safety has moved on greatly since those days but people in power still turn a blind eye to that main stand at Castleford which should have been pulled down years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to help you out here.

 

At the time in question Wakefield were forced to pull down their main stand ,which for those that don't know was along the touchline where those few portacabins are now.

 

Where the benidorm flats now stand there was  a large terraced bank with a good covered stand. The dimensions were very simillar to what still exists at the other end of the pitch. They were forced to remove all of this.

 

They also had a decent set of floodlights on 8 pylons (4 down eac side) these were at the back of the stands behind the spectators. These were probably some of the newest in the league at the time. However they also had to demolish these and replace them with the present ones.

 

This came as a masive blow to the club and it is still feeling the effects today.

 

However the same local authority that forced these demands onto Wakefield completely ignored the wooden main stand at castleford and their much older floodlights were also allowed to remain. Health and safety has moved on greatly since those days but people in power still turn a blind eye to that main stand at Castleford which should have been pulled down years ago.

 

That doesn't tally with my memory, I thought that the terracing had been demolished as part of a hair-brained scheme to build a supermarket where the flats are now, and I seem to think that this was well before the Bradford City fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to help you out here.

 

At the time in question Wakefield were forced to pull down their main stand ,which for those that don't know was along the touchline where those few portacabins are now.

 

Where the benidorm flats now stand there was  a large terraced bank with a good covered stand. The dimensions were very simillar to what still exists at the other end of the pitch. They were forced to remove all of this.

 

They also had a decent set of floodlights on 8 pylons (4 down eac side) these were at the back of the stands behind the spectators. These were probably some of the newest in the league at the time. However they also had to demolish these and replace them with the present ones.

 

This came as a masive blow to the club and it is still feeling the effects today.

 

However the same local authority that forced these demands onto Wakefield completely ignored the wooden main stand at castleford and their much older floodlights were also allowed to remain. Health and safety has moved on greatly since those days but people in power still turn a blind eye to that main stand at Castleford which should have been pulled down years ago.

Belle Vue was a fantastic ground and as Larry says, the old main stand was a magnificent and unique feature. The story of its demise is a sorry one especially in view of the apparent comparative leniency afforded to Cas. For some reason I was always under the impression that the big covered terrace was demolished on the say so of chairman, Trevor Woodward who had plans for improved development at that end of the ground but obviously never happened. Have I got that wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was deemed to be unsafe and unstable and too near to the houses behind it. The council said it had to be strenghtened or removed. The club went for the least cost option and then decided to make something out of a bad job and came up with the Woodward scheme.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, The Woodward plan was to knock down the South Terrace which he did. Then remove the present North terrace. Move the ground 20/30 yards south and build the supermarket where the present North Terrace is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, The Woodward plan was to knock down the South Terrace which he did. Then remove the present North terrace. Move the ground 20/30 yards south and build the supermarket where the present North Terrace is.

Thanks for that Agbrigg, looks like Trinity felt the full weight of the safety regs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was deemed to be unsafe and unstable and too near to the houses behind it. The council said it had to be strenghtened or removed. The club went for the least cost option and then decided to make something out of a bad job and came up with the Woodward scheme.

 

I can't question the decision by the council, as I'm not sure whether or not my memory of the stand is real or peiced together from watching This Sporting Life.  If you know more please post more, this is fascinating to me.  Can you remember the timing of the demolition?  I'm fairly certain it was well before the Bradford fire.

 

By the way, The Woodward plan was to knock down the South Terrace which he did. Then remove the present North terrace. Move the ground 20/30 yards south and build the supermarket where the present North Terrace is.

 

I had always wondered how they were going to fit a supermarket at the southern end.  That would be one hell of a civil engineering project to move the north bank, and dare I say it a completely unsuitable place to put a supermarket.  I don't suppose you know the chain involved do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Agbrigg, looks like Trinity felt the full weight of the safety regs

 

I have no issue with that, so long as they were appropriate.  That stand was brilliant though, if a little small.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The South bank was just a large as the North bank so yes it was a massive civil engineering project just to remove it.

 

Unlike today where you would fence it off and pull it down it wasn't done like that. The stand was actually used whilst the work was taking place. The covered stand was removed first whilst the terracing was still in use. The terracing was removed from top to bottom because I can remember watching a game stood on the last few yards of remaing terrace.

 

Time wise I would say around 1977  but the work could have taken a season to complete

I can't question the decision by the council, as I'm not sure whether or not my memory of the stand is real or peiced together from watching This Sporting Life.  If you know more please post more, this is fascinating to me.  Can you remember the timing of the demolition?  I'm fairly certain it was well before the Bradford fire.

 

 

I had always wondered how they were going to fit a supermarket at the southern end.  That would be one hell of a civil engineering project to move the north bank, and dare I say it a completely unsuitable place to put a supermarket.  I don't suppose you know the chain involved do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The South bank was just a large as the North bank so yes it was a massive civil engineering project just to remove it.

 

Unlike today where you would fence it off and pull it down it wasn't done like that. The stand was actually used whilst the work was taking place. The covered stand was removed first whilst the terracing was still in use. The terracing was removed from top to bottom because I can remember watching a game stood on the last few yards of remaing terrace.

 

Time wise I would say around 1977  but the work could have taken a season to complete

 

Thanks.  You and Terry would have been around forty back then I'd guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main stand at Castleford whilst being obsolete conforms to safety standards. No favouritism was shown to the club by the council. The law is the law and the stand and the way it is used conforms to it. The current main stand at Belle Vue: the east stand  is as obsolete as the main stand at Castleford and has similar issues- and as with Castleford's conforms with the law.

 

It was the entirely Club's decision to demolish the beautiful if inadequate West Stand at Belle Vue. They chose not to go to the expense of making it conform with the law.

 

The Agbrigg Road end was demolished in 1979, taking the fairly modern covering with it. It became a farm building and might well still exist. This as has been said was part of an abortive super market development.

 

What has happened at Belle Vue was entirely relative to decision making at the club.

 

I dont know what people are getting nostalgic about the old Belle Vue Floodlights for, they as with the Castleford ones interrupted sight lines and gave poor illumination. The current ones are superb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.  You and Terry would have been around forty back then I'd guess.

 

I still have the looks of a forty year old. Last time I was with Terry though I remarked  how the years had not been kind to him :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pulled out my This Sporting Life DVD to have a look at Belle Vue.  The West stand looks great, the South I don't think is on the same scale as the North, but certainly looked good packed full.

 

I actually think the film gives a great record of Belle Vue, so much better than sterile stills.  Nice shot of the grander bit of Thrum Hall too if I remember rightly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have the looks of a forty year old. Last time I was with Terry though I remarked  how the years had not been kind to him :D

 

Is he still sporting that tash?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main stand at Castleford whilst being obsolete conforms to safety standards. No favouritism was shown to the club by the council. The law is the law and the stand and the way it is used conforms to it. The current main stand at Belle Vue: the east stand  is as obsolete as the main stand at Castleford and has similar issues- and as with Castleford's conforms with the law.

 

I dont know what people are getting nostalgic about the old Belle Vue Floodlights for, they as with the Castleford ones interrupted sight lines and gave poor illumination. The current ones are superb.

 

I agree about the floodlights.  I've never really been in the east stand at Belle Vue, except during the monsoon-like downpour that arrived in the second half of Trinity's record high score when we we benevolently rounded up by the club from the terraces to avoid us drowning.  However my memory is that it is not a hollow wooden structure like at Cas but a rather solid lump of bricks/concrete.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree about the floodlights.  I've never really been in the east stand at Belle Vue, except during the monsoon-like downpour that arrived in the second half of Trinity's record high score when we we benevolently rounded up by the club from the terraces to avoid us drowning.  However my memory is that it is not a hollow wooden structure like at Cas but a rather solid lump of bricks/concrete.

 

 

I agree about the floodlights.  I've never really been in the east stand at Belle Vue, except during the monsoon-like downpour that arrived in the second half of Trinity's record high score when we we benevolently rounded up by the club from the terraces to avoid us drowning.  However my memory is that it is not a hollow wooden structure like at Cas but a rather solid lump of bricks/concrete.

you are probable right. I was referring to the bogs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original proposition of this thread was that RL in UK has become insular and self-absorbed.

 

 

Does anyone think that the posts that followed supported or disproved this?

 

 

 

Just asking! :rolleyes:

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have the looks of a forty year old. Last time I was with Terry though I remarked how the years had not been kind to him :D

What are you two on about? I'm still only a lad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he still sporting that tash?

No it's gone and makes me look even younger. Anyway you should know I saw you at Belle Vue last season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original proposition of this thread was that RL in UK has become insular and self-absorbed.

Does anyone think that the posts that followed supported or disproved this?

Just asking! :rolleyes:

 

Middle aged blokes reminiscing about floodlights, stands and 'tashes of yesteryear. What do you reckon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Middle aged blokes reminiscing about floodlights, stands and 'tashes of yesteryear. What do you reckon?

cheaply made porn flick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - June 2017

League Express - Mon 17th July 2017