Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Stevens

Super League League Reconstruction

Super League Format   129 members have voted

  1. 1. Which opition/format for Super league do you want from 2015 onwards?

    • Option 1 - Super League reverts to a 12-team competition (from 14) and a 10 or 12-team Championship, with one club promoted and relegated each year.
      48
    • Option 2 - A two division Super League with each division comprising of 10 teams.
      19
    • Opition 3 - Two divisions of 12 in Super League with teams playing each other one to provide 11 fixtures before spliting into 3 groups of 8 in mi-season then playing each other home & away to provide 14 more Matches.
      62

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

442 posts in this topic

Alarming decline in crowds over the past few years? really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Toulouse would add to the average SL crowds?  Catalans get most of their away crowds from the UK because it's a once-a-year trip for fans, it'd have to be a pretty committed fan who'll do two foreign trips.

 

On the rest, it would just shift the locked-in ceiling a bit lower and creates a different group of angry clubs that feel slighted.  It also gives the Championship sides no incentive to improve their grounds and club as long as their competitors don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's quite alarming in our game is the decline in crowds over the past few years I know we're not in great times but for me mainly its do with the current structure of the comp.

I'd like to see a 12 team super league with toulose given a 3 year licence top 6 playoff and bottom place going down and then go with a strong 8 team championship that could be full time with grand final winners going up but no relegation from this league. Underneath that 2 national leagues with 1 up 1 down anyone wishing to join the championship must apply thoughts?

 

Having experienced an 8 team league back in 1991 when each team played the other 4 times I would not wish that on any other clubs.   It was a complete turn-off for most fans of the 8 clubs stuck in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. So which club brings more to Superleague then Les Catalans or Widnes. Pick the latter and there's no point in debating any more.

2. Who were they and how did they stay up??

a. Hull FC with the MONEY a big following brought them?

b. HKR with the half a million a year MONEY Hudgell pumped into them?

c. Salford with the millions of MONEY wilkinson put in

d. Huddersfield with the millions of MONEY Davey puts in

I've given you a clue in terms of how promotion works in our game, it generally only works when you have millions to bridge the gap. For Hull the KC grew the crowds, they did it by growth.

There's no growth in the championships. And no money.

 

You forgot Wakefield and Salford. both of whom had investors.

 

I'll give you a club how licencing works. it always works when the clubs have millions to keep them in SL. So it makes no difference jhow a club gets into SL, via p and r, or by being given a licence, once they get there they rely on investors. Looking at the championships, it looks Fev and Fax have investors already and if p and r is an option, who knows which other Championship teams might attract some. For you to say they don't exist is just as much wihful thinking as me saying they do. Only the return of p and r will flush them out or not.

 

As for the Catalans V Widnes argument, it;s not an either or scenario. Both clubs bring value to SL in different ways. Whether they stay in SL should be decided on the field of play or by the expansion of SL to keep them both at the table.

 

I think Catalans are a good thing and have been the saviour of French RL but their inclusion in the British league is only for the sake of expediency. A far better thing would be to have a French SL comprising 10 or more strong clubs, being to France what SL is to the UK.

 

Then there could be a European competiton between the two leagues a la WCC or Heineken cup in RU.

 

That would be way better than one or two French clubs keeping British clubs out of their own competition. but, for now, I say keep them in SL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, running a RL comp is not rocket science. It's all very SIMPLE:

 

Super league

 

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for Manchester magic weekend), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion, 12th placegetter is relegated to Championship.

 

Championship

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for their own "magic" weekend at a 20,000-odd seat venue like headingly or Huddersfield), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion and promoted to Super League ASSUMING MINIMUM SUPER LEAGUE STANDARDS ARE MET, 12th placegetter is relegated to Championship 1

 

 

Championship 1

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for their own "magic" weekend at a 10,000-odd seat venue like Salford or Leigh), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion and promoted to Championship ASSUMING MINIMUM CHAMPIONSHIP STANDARDS ARE MET, 12th placegetter stays.

 

Any new teams that want to be a pro RL comp can join Championship 1, or a semi-pro Championship 2 (or Championship 2 North and Championship 2 South) can eventually form.

 

Each comp has as its ABSOLUTE climax an exciting GF, where the winner becomes champion (and is promoted where applicable)

 

Reduced number of games = higher quality games = increased interest and crowds (which will make up for reduced revenue of less games)

 

Reduced number of games also mean games become more of an EVENT

 

Battles to get into Top 5 and/or avoid relegation will also increase interest 

 

NO bonus points, NO choose-your-playoff opposition or other ridiculous gimmicks; just keep EVERYTHING in the structure simple, so it becomes easy to follow for everyone - and it is LOGICAL

 

It's not hard !!!!!

 

Yours

Concerned Oz RL internationalist

 

PS: Any move to a 12x2 SL, which splits into 3x8 structure to be resisted AS IT IS CONFUSING AND UTTERLY LUDICROUS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, running a RL comp is not rocket science. It's all very SIMPLE:

 

Super league

 

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for Manchester magic weekend), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion, 12th placegetter is relegated to Championship.

 

Championship

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for their own "magic" weekend at a 20,000-odd seat venue like headingly or Huddersfield), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion and promoted to Super League ASSUMING MINIMUM SUPER LEAGUE STANDARDS ARE MET, 12th placegetter is relegated to Championship 1

 

 

Championship 1

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for their own "magic" weekend at a 10,000-odd seat venue like Salford or Leigh), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion and promoted to Championship ASSUMING MINIMUM CHAMPIONSHIP STANDARDS ARE MET, 12th placegetter stays.

 

Any new teams that want to be a pro RL comp can join Championship 1, or a semi-pro Championship 2 (or Championship 2 North and Championship 2 South) can eventually form.

 

Each comp has as its ABSOLUTE climax an exciting GF, where the winner becomes champion (and is promoted where applicable)

 

Reduced number of games = higher quality games = increased interest and crowds (which will make up for reduced revenue of less games)

 

Reduced number of games also mean games become more of an EVENT

 

Battles to get into Top 5 and/or avoid relegation will also increase interest 

 

NO bonus points, NO choose-your-playoff opposition or other ridiculous gimmicks; just keep EVERYTHING in the structure simple, so it becomes easy to follow for everyone - and it is LOGICAL

 

It's not hard !!!!!

 

Yours

Concerned Oz RL internationalist

 

PS: Any move to a 12x2 SL, which splits into 3x8 structure to be resisted AS IT IS CONFUSING AND UTTERLY LUDICROUS

 

That's so logical, understandable and possible that it has no chance of happening.

 

The RFL want this 3 eights confusathon with the resultant six or so unchanging top teams playing at Old Trafford every year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, running a RL comp is not rocket science. It's all very SIMPLE:

Super league

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for Manchester magic weekend), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion, 12th placegetter is relegated to Championship.

Championship

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for their own "magic" weekend at a 20,000-odd seat venue like headingly or Huddersfield), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion and promoted to Super League ASSUMING MINIMUM SUPER LEAGUE STANDARDS ARE MET, 12th placegetter is relegated to Championship 1

Championship 1

12 teams, 22 rounds (add a 23rd for their own "magic" weekend at a 10,000-odd seat venue like Salford or Leigh), top 5 playoff, GF winner is the champion and promoted to Championship ASSUMING MINIMUM CHAMPIONSHIP STANDARDS ARE MET, 12th placegetter stays.

Any new teams that want to be a pro RL comp can join Championship 1, or a semi-pro Championship 2 (or Championship 2 North and Championship 2 South) can eventually form.

Each comp has as its ABSOLUTE climax an exciting GF, where the winner becomes champion (and is promoted where applicable)

Reduced number of games = higher quality games = increased interest and crowds (which will make up for reduced revenue of less games)

Reduced number of games also mean games become more of an EVENT

Battles to get into Top 5 and/or avoid relegation will also increase interest

NO bonus points, NO choose-your-playoff opposition or other ridiculous gimmicks; just keep EVERYTHING in the structure simple, so it becomes easy to follow for everyone - and it is LOGICAL

It's not hard !!!!!

Yours

Concerned Oz RL internationalist

PS: Any move to a 12x2 SL, which splits into 3x8 structure to be resisted AS IT IS CONFUSING AND UTTERLY LUDICROUS

Jim - nothing wrong with the 3x8 split. It isnt rocket science and has bags of excitement.

Btw there is nothing more ludicrous than the golden point and bye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Under my logical plan there is neither golden points nor byes.

Or enough games for clubs to survive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the championships, it looks Fev and Fax have investors already and if p and r is an option, who knows which other Championship teams might attract some. For you to say they don't exist is just as much wihful thinking as me saying they do. Only the return of p and r will flush them out or not.

I'd agree if P & R had never been tried before, Since Superleague ran on P & R for 12 years I have the reality on my side that big investors do not want to waste their money on small clubs, those who maybe did have recently declared they have had enough.

You just cannot dismiss chunks of real history and real facts like this because it doesn't suit you.

What sort of an argument is it to say "lets try P & R and see if rich men want to pick up our small clubs"?

It just completely dismisses the 12 years that proved they didn't want to do this.

In 1996 it was a brave new world for RL and that was the best time for the game to have attracted the rich men. It didn't happen to the extent we needed it so why argue this process is yet to come, why deny history??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or enough games for clubs to survive.

Then why don't clubs play 30 or even 40 rounds? Then they'll be awash with cash, presumably ....

 

No, more games = less intensity/less quality/greater disinterest and lower crowds.

 

Te NFL in the US has a short home-and-away series of rounds, yet they are awash with cash.

 

It's all about quality: quality games, intensity and above all ADMINISTRATION

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd agree if P & R had never been tried before, Since Superleague ran on P & R for 12 years I have the reality on my side that big investors do not want to waste their money on small clubs, those who maybe did have recently declared they have had enough.

You just cannot dismiss chunks of real history and real facts like this because it doesn't suit you.

What sort of an argument is it to say "lets try P & R and see if rich men want to pick up our small clubs"?

It just completely dismisses the 12 years that proved they didn't want to do this.

In 1996 it was a brave new world for RL and that was the best time for the game to have attracted the rich men. It didn't happen to the extent we needed it so why argue this process is yet to come, why deny history??

 

Hudgell came to Hull KR when they were in Div 2. Salford spent several different seasons in the lower leagues and Wilkinson never wavered. Huddersfield were in the lower divisions and dAVY  was there with them. Crusaders started in CC1 with Samuels who took them all the way to SL. Leigh had an investor as did Barrow both of whom had to quit but still they did invest. Fev and Fax currently have investors.

 

Its you who are denying chunks of history that don t suit you. It s you who are denying history. We used to regulalry thrash the Aussies and British RL was way bigger than the Aussie version which, at senior level, was confined to one city. That is history but guess what, it didn t repeat itself. So, guess what, this time around p and r might just suceed. Maybe we have learned from our mistakes hence standards based p and r. Come on Parky, Dare to dream because, after all he who dares, wins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its you who are denying chunks of history that don t suit you.

Come on Parky, Dare to dream because, after all he who dares, wins.

There have been about 34 clubs in the Rugby League in the first 12 years of the game under P & R between championship and Superleague.

Only four of the 34 clubs have had a rich man with staying power take them over and boost them on and off the field.

There is therefore no evidence at all to back the wishful thinking that P & R returning will throw up a series of rich owners, indeed it's a myth promotion ever went away as rich men with little staying power have received promotion in recent years.

no need to reply, that's my final position..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been about 34 clubs in the Rugby League in the first 12 years of the game under P & R between championship and Superleague.

Only four of the 34 clubs have had a rich man with staying power take them over and boost them on and off the field.

There is therefore no evidence at all to back the wishful thinking that P & R returning will throw up a series of rich owners, indeed it's a myth promotion ever went away as rich men with little staying power have received promotion in recent years.

no need to reply, that's my final position..

 

Well, it's not up to you to dtermine when a thread will end. If there have been and only ever will be four men to take clubs forward to promotion and beyond, what are you and the other crusaders for the staus quo afraid of ?

 

Maybe you are wrong ? Its happened before. After all, we now know the earth is not flat and the sun is just a minor star.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it's not up to you to dtermine when a thread will end. If there have been and only ever will be four men to take clubs forward to promotion and beyond, what are you and the other crusaders for the staus quo afraid of ?

Maybe you are wrong ? Its happened before. After all, we now know the earth is not flat and the sun is just a minor star.

If I may

He hasn't said the thread has ended

Merely that has no wish to take further part in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it's not up to you to dtermine when a thread will end. If there have been and only ever will be four men to take clubs forward to promotion and beyond, what are you and the other crusaders for the staus quo afraid of ?

Maybe you are wrong ? Its happened before. After all, we now know the earth is not flat and the sun is just a minor star.

If I may

He hasn't said the thread has ended

Merely that has no wish to take further part in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I may

He hasn't said the thread has ended

Merely that has no wish to take further part in it.

Thank you.

I refer my right honourable friend to the answer I gave in post #438

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - June 2017

League Express - Mon 17th July 2017