Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

parky

Mr.Chambers.

36 posts in this topic

If the rumours are true about the return of academy under 23s then obviously it won't continue in its present guise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your figures may be an accurate record mark but surely Mendeika, Riley and Shaw would have played more if Warrington hadn't loaned them out to various clubs including themselves!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your figures may be an accurate record mark but surely Mendeika, Riley and Shaw would have played more if Warrington hadn't loaned them out to various clubs including themselves!!!

The same can also be said for Gareth O'Brien and Danny Bridge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They aren't my figures Keith they are the figures. Maybe they would maybe they wouldn't.

A few matches here and there by anyone won't make much difference to the point made as a whole.

Thanks Phil for adding your tuppence worth. Always a pleasure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is it true that the players and coaching staff have not been getting paid? that may be the cause of most of the problems rather than the actual link up with Warrington

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is it true that the players and coaching staff have not been getting paid? that may be the cause of most of the problems rather than the actual link up with Warrington

 

Is that the win bonuses you are referring to? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the u23s are brought back, does it have to mean the linked clubs will need to part company?. There will still be players coming back from injury and younger players that the mother club thinks would gain from playing in a higher standard comp

The question is 

a) would they be able to renew the contracts ( & afford) the players which have come frpm Warrington on a one year deal ?

B) Would Warrington be able to field an Under23's without the players they reluctantly had to let go ( due to the acadmey structure) 

C) where would the players prefer to be playing next year

D) Do they think champ 1 is a better standard ( comp) then SL under 23's

 

expecially if relegation happended!

 

Its not just yourselves in this predicament I can see rochdale havng to recruit again next year 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 24th July 2017

Rugby League World - August 2017