Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oldrover

weired

61 posts in this topic

does anyone else think it's weired, all this talk of new signings for next season when this one isn't even finished. i think we have a very exciting end of season to come, and all this transfer talk is distracting. it's not as if we know what the league and academy structures are going to be next season. let's go unbeaten now, and get this grand final won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone else think it's weired, all this talk of new signings for next season when this one isn't even finished. i think we have a very exciting end of season to come, and all this transfer talk is distracting. it's not as if we know what the league and academy structures are going to be next season. let's go unbeaten now, and get this grand final won.

Agree OR if the transfer rumours are to be believed we will have a A team a B team and a C team with all the players linked to our club

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Agree OR if the transfer rumours are to be believed we will have a A team a B team and a C team with all the players linked to our club .

Two new directors with business accumen. All this talk is to make us feel that we are going in the right direction. A prelude to you know what. Not mentioned? I reckon it will be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two new directors with business accumen. All this talk is to make us feel that we are going in the right direction. A prelude to you know what. Not mentioned? I reckon it will be.

What you mean col? As I see it they have been brought in to make us a successful business. Great move I reckon as it should make us self sufficient in time hopefully.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree anyone that can improve the club should be welcomed with open arms and if the men in charge think these two new directors can make things better thats only good for us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two new directors with business accumen. All this talk is to make us feel that we are going in the right direction. A prelude to you know what. Not mentioned? I reckon it will be.

I haven't a bloody clue what you're going on about colin???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't a bloody clue what you're going on about colin???

neither have you, have you col lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have said it before. This is a prelude to selling the land. I don't think we should rush into anything until it is all weighed up. I know the pro's and cons and hope that we consider them before we lose our biggest asset, which in my opinion could happen. Want my ideas? Let them build on OUR land and then share the rental income. I am not saying don't use the land. But it will be an appreciating asset and if we don't get the income from crowd sources any money received if sold will slowly disappear. End result no land and no money. Far better to hold on to it and give long term leases and share the income. There is an alternative. Sell half the land and build in the other half ourselves. Thereby obtaining an investment bulk sum that give us a source of building and a subsequent income whilst retaining that land. Talking rubbish? We shall see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have said it before. This is a prelude to selling the land. I don't think we should rush into anything until it is all weighed up. I know the pro's and cons and hope that we consider them before we lose our biggest asset, which in my opinion could happen. Want my ideas? Let them build on OUR land and then share the rental income. I am not saying don't use the land. But it will be an appreciating asset and if we don't get the income from crowd sources any money received if sold will slowly disappear. End result no land and no money. Far better to hold on to it and give long term leases and share the income. There is an alternative. Sell half the land and build in the other half ourselves. Thereby obtaining an investment bulk sum that give us a source of building and a subsequent income whilst retaining that land. Talking rubbish? We shall see.

So to cut that short col. Your saying probiz/feisal are only after our land?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So to cut that short col. Your saying probiz/feisal are only after our land?

It was said at a fans forum by MC that Probiz are not after the land and never were. I understand people thinking this but why not believe what we were told by the BOD Things are on the up lets enjoy the road ahead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feizal is a business man. There are 17 acres. If you were in his shoes and could get it for a relative pittance what would you do? I could be wrong of course but just want people not to be blinded by the razmataz. I think he is even handed and the club would benefit but not as much as him in the long term if we just sell. I reckon my ideas would be better. We shall see. I mentioned the introduction of new directors and was shouted down (if your memory goes back that far). So don't be blinded by possible short term gains is my message.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It was said at a fans forum by MC that Probiz are not after the land and never were. I understand people thinking this but why not believe what we were told by the BOD Things are on the up lets enjoy the road ahead

 Good point. But don't forget that he now controls who will be a director from the 'B' side anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feizal is a business man. There are 17 acres. If you were in his shoes and could get it for a relative pittance what would you do? I could be wrong of course but just want people not to be blinded by the razmataz. I think he is even handed and the club would benefit but not as much as him in the long term if we just sell. I reckon my ideas would be better. We shall see. I mentioned the introduction of new directors and was shouted down (if your memory goes back that far). So don't be blinded by possible short term gains is my message.

Yeah col but as we keep getting told he was at fax and C@s before us. Their was no land in them clubs for him. Maybe he just wants to be part of the rugby league world. (That's how i see it anyway).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bloke is a multi millionare what would he want with a bit of land in fev????

The board running our club at the min are not idiots

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not part of Cas now. Left when they wouldn't sell him the club. Or have I got that wrong. I admire Feisal as a business man and as such I reckon he wont miss opportunities when they arise TG. If I am wrong then let me know what plans we will have for the land in question. For us to move forward and a big investment being made in the club the land HAS to come into it. These guys are not do-gooders they are businessmen with rich Middle East connections, looking for good investments with good returns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not part of cas now because the lied to him about there situation, i reckon the bloke is that rich a bit of spare land in Fev will not be his motivating factor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The bloke is a multi millionare what would he want with a bit of land in fev????

The board running our club at the min are not idiots

  

The bloke is a multi millionare what would he want with a bit of land in fev????

The board running our club at the min are not idiots

17 acres of building land worth around 15 million quid and land prices are due to rise. How do you reckon he became a multi millionaire? My remarks are for the 'A' share holders hoping they are not blinded with short terms gains. How many directors now he has a majority holding wont see thing his way especially as he will be able to put them in place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All your comment is supposition colin. You have no evidence whatsoever to suggest he's remotely interested in the land. The board have repeatedly said the land is not for sale. What more does it take??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  

17 acres of building land worth around 15 million quid and land prices are due to rise. How do you reckon he became a multi millionaire? My remarks are for the 'A' share holders hoping they are not blinded with short terms gains. How many directors now he has a majority holding wont see thing his way especially as he will be able to put them in place.

it is green belt land not building land and worth no where near 15 million

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 acres of building land worth around 15 million quid and land prices are due to rise. How do you reckon he became a multi millionaire? My remarks are for the 'A' share holders hoping they are not blinded with short terms gains. How many directors now he has a majority holding wont see thing his way especially as he will be able to put them in place.

Just a thought col but isn't most of the 17 acres green belted anyway? But I personally don't think he's in it for the land anyway myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is green belt land not building land and worth no where near 15 million

at current circumstances you are correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is green belt land not building land and worth no where near 15 million

You bet me too it lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

at current circumstances you are correct.

but if you leave a lump of coyle in the ground long enough itl turn into a diamond

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So are we saying he is going to put money into the club with no return? You are right Robin it is supposition based on 40 years commercial experience. My comments, as I said , are aimed at the 'A' share holders to make them aware of the possible pitfalls. He will of course control the people elected to the 'B' share holding. So what will the board say then? Whatever he tells them as they will be his 'yes' men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So are we saying he is going to put money into the club with no return? You are right Robin it is supposition based on 40 years commercial experience. My comments, as I said , are aimed at the 'A' share holders to make them aware of the possible pitfalls. He will of course control the people elected to the 'B' share holding. So what will the board say then? Whatever he tells them as they will be his 'yes' men.

For the life of me cant ever see our chairman been a yes man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - June 2017

League Express - Mon 24th July 2017