Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Marauder

David Gents letter to the Community Clubs

48 posts in this topic

What's your take on this letter that's been circulated to all Community Clubs by David Gent.

 

IMO it's an attempt to provoke clubs into signing up to the Operational rules when it's just about nothing to do with the lads death, what he also fails to say is a16 years old collapsed during a game and died shortly afterwards, it seems everyone at the RFL have forgotten about him.

 

The difference with this event and the open age death was that the 16 year-old died from an existing medical condition rather than an injury sustained on the field.

 

I like the including BARLA have approved a draft of the Operational rules, this is a clear lie

 

SIMPLY BECAUSE B.A.R.L.A. ARE STILL WAITING THE FEED BACK FROM CLUBS, DISTRICTS AND PLAYING LEAGUES

 

Dear Community Club

 

As you may be aware the RFL Community Board (including BARLA) recently approved a draft, game wide set of Operational Rules to service the whole of the Community Game. The Board unanimously approved a consultation period and wants all Leagues to approve the adoption of these Rules so that they can come into force in March 2014 for ‘summer’ based leagues and September 2014 for ‘winter’ based leagues.

 

The background to the creation of these Rules comes from the Coroner’s decision in the unfortunate case of (Players name deleted) deceased in September 2009. In that case the Coroner was highly critical of the fact that there did not appear to be a clear single set of rules that dealt with minimum standards of care, roles and responsibilities and operational matters within the Community Game.

 

As a result of that finding, the RFL through the Community Board (and including BARLA) concluded that it was not only the right thing to do but that it was imperative to protect Community Game players that one set of rules governing all operational matters setting out roles, responsibilities and minimum standards of levels of care was required.

 

A draft consultation of these Rules has been sent to all the playing leagues for them to read, consider and feedback. If you would like to view a copy of these then please email vicky.turner@rfl.uk.com should you then have any comments please feed these in to a playing league or an RFL Club and Competition Manager.

 

The formal consultation period with leagues will run from the 16th June until 5pm on the 16th September 2013. The purpose of the consultation is to ensure;

 

  1. Each community/amateur league understands the role and purpose of the rules and why they are needed;
  2. Determine if any alterations are needed to be made to the operational rules to meet the requirements of the league, and;
  3. Obtain the in principle approval of the league to the operational rules.

 

Assuming that there is general agreement across the leagues to the operational rules then the Community Board at its 16th October 2013 meeting will approve the one set of operational rules for the Community Game as a whole and the rules will take affect from March 2014 for all community and amateur leagues.

 

 

 

 

 

The RFL wishes to meet with every League Management Group to discuss and consider their views on these Rules. These Rules are designed to clarify the wider issues of the Community Game and it is envisaged that each Competition will still have its own specific Competition Rules that sit underneath the Operational Rules in order to allow Competitions to run as normal and maintain their integrity.

 

Before the various playing leagues accept the operational rules they will call an SGM or use their leagues AGM to inform your participating teams of any changes.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Players name deleted because I wouldn't want to use a death to win brownie points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that Barla have agreed to the production of the Draft rules and they are exactly what they are which is a starting point to a finished agreed document .

 

There are several elements which many leagues are not happy with , what I do not like is the way IMO the RFL are individulising the issue when it should be a game wide decision .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the including BARLA have approved a draft of the Operational rules, this is a clear lie

 

 

As taxi states this is not a lie. At the community board in May the then Chair of BARLA agreed to the operational rules on behalf of BARLA although he was prompted several times that this is the point where you object he said, and I quote, "apart from a couple of changes BARLA accept and are OK with the operational rules. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Players name deleted because I wouldn't want to use a death to win brownie points.[/size]

Are you suggesting the RFL are using a player's death as a "convenient" vehicle to pursue their "agenda"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine... a sport where the rules are set and issued from a central governing body... no other sport would put up with such a dictatorship...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine... a sport where the rules are set and issued from a central governing body... no other sport would put up with such a dictatorship...

Nail. Head. If, one of the issues a few individuals on here seam to have about operational rules is the ability of "contracted" pro players playing "amateur" rugby league they should wonder about the irony of 1. Denying an individual a game who wants one and 2. The 100 year fight RL had in order for RL players to play "shamateur" RU and vice versa. It wasn't a RU accident they declared their game "open". Some "amateur" RL protagonists are worse than some RU ones ever were. Lets play the game. Too many are playing smoke and dagger petty politics for their own agendas and wallowing in a so called demise of "amateur" RL as proof of their prejudices.

The fact is that pro RL would not survive without amateur RL, in the same way they amateur RL would gain a status akin to Cumberland wrestling if the kids didn't have a pro game to aspire to.

Time for the game and individuals to get a grip and commit to improving the sport for all concerned. The little green men on Mars rubbish that keep getting churned out on here is getting a bit tedious.

It's been several weeks since the NWC 16-18 meeting and there's been no movement from the agitators who were filing through their rule book that night. Time to back if or back off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been several weeks since the NWC 16-18 meeting and there's been no movement from the agitators who were filing through their rule book that night. Time to back if or back off.

 

A spot of fishing?

 

Sorry wrong bait!

 

All will become apparent in due course  ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A spot of fishing?

Sorry wrong bait!

All will become apparent in due course ;)

Due course. Is this before or after the signatures from the relevant club secretaries is collected? That was 30% wasn't it? How many you got so far?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nail. Head. If, one of the issues a few individuals on here seam to have about operational rules is the ability of "contracted" pro players playing "amateur" rugby league they should wonder about the irony of 1. Denying an individual a game who wants one and 2. The 100 year fight RL had in order for RL players to play "shamateur" RU and vice versa. It wasn't a RU accident they declared their game "open". Some "amateur" RL protagonists are worse than some RU ones ever were. Lets play the game. Too many are playing smoke and dagger petty politics for their own agendas and wallowing in a so called demise of "amateur" RL as proof of their prejudices.

The fact is that pro RL would not survive without amateur RL, in the same way they amateur RL would gain a status akin to Cumberland wrestling if the kids didn't have a pro game to aspire to.

Time for the game and individuals to get a grip and commit to improving the sport for all concerned. The little green men on Mars rubbish that keep getting churned out on here is getting a bit tedious.

It's been several weeks since the NWC 16-18 meeting and there's been no movement from the agitators who were filing through their rule book that night. Time to back if or back off.

So far the game under the RFL guidance has become like a body with moderate hypothermia and in 2014 it will be going into the severe early stages as it closes super league down from 14 to 12 clubs. 

 

 

In other words all the RFL want is the elite part of the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Due course. Is this before or after the signatures from the relevant club secretaries is collected? That was 30% wasn't it? How many you got so far?

86%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Due course. Is this before or after the signatures from the relevant club secretaries is collected? That was 30% wasn't it? How many you got so far?

 

More fishing.........must be really bothering you just what us "Amateur Activists" are up to and where we are at with it all  ;)

 

Due course............as and when appropriate.

 

Better hope all the other parties that are jocking for position have everything in hand   :help:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More fishing.........must be really bothering you just what us "Amateur Activists" are up to and where we are at with it all ;)

Due course............as and when appropriate.

Better hope all the other parties that are jocking for position have everything in hand :help:

All this before ratification in October?

If you're so concerned about secrecy why not state loud and proud what your position or plan is. The constitution is as it is. You get the numbers you get the gig.

Imagine you were talking to a room full of amateur activists, brought together let's say because you had got 30% of secretaries to provide support for an EGM.

Imagine again that most of that room hadn't bothered reading the draft OR because they just want to get on a play rugby, not politics.

What is it that YOU would say to that room that the draft OR causes problems with regard to the day to day administration of the game and players being able to play rugby.

Nows your chance, you've said enough to suggest problems with other people's motives about the situation . What is it YOU want? What should that room know,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All this before ratification in October?

If you're so concerned about secrecy why not state loud and proud what your position or plan is. The constitution is as it is. You get the numbers you get the gig.

Imagine you were talking to a room full of amateur activists, brought together let's say because you had got 30% of secretaries to provide support for an EGM.

Imagine again that most of that room hadn't bothered reading the draft OR because they just want to get on a play rugby, not politics.

What is it that YOU would say to that room that the draft OR causes problems with regard to the day to day administration of the game and players being able to play rugby.

Nows your chance, you've said enough to suggest problems with other people's motives about the situation . What is it YOU want? What should that room know,

I Just wonder why David Gent felt the need to send his letter to community clubs  :sclerosis:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Just wonder why David Gent felt the need to send his letter to community clubs :sclerosis:

Because the changes would affect them?

Seriously, if some of the professional committee politicians on here put their petty grievances, malignant politicking and ludicrous lack of judgement reference the relative importance of different issues to one side, the game would be thriving at all levels.

The RFL and above them the RLIF should be the sole point(s) of authority for the UK game. Any other bodies should be advisory only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Just wonder why David Gent felt the need to send his letter to community clubs :sclerosis:

Haven't you been calling for the information to be circulated further than district/regional leagues?

Perhaps they thought a few individuals in positions of influence were failing to pass on any/balanced information?

I'm with NEC the sooner there is one point of authority for the game the better. We complain the RFU get this that and the other and yet are in control of the games destiny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Just wonder why David Gent felt the need to send his letter to community clubs  :sclerosis:

Maybe he thought if he just sent it to the leagues it wouldn't be passed on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All this before ratification in October?

If you're so concerned about secrecy why not state loud and proud what your position or plan is. The constitution is as it is. You get the numbers you get the gig.

Imagine you were talking to a room full of amateur activists, brought together let's say because you had got 30% of secretaries to provide support for an EGM.

Imagine again that most of that room hadn't bothered reading the draft OR because they just want to get on a play rugby, not politics.

What is it that YOU would say to that room that the draft OR causes problems with regard to the day to day administration of the game and players being able to play rugby.

Nows your chance, you've said enough to suggest problems with other people's motives about the situation . What is it YOU want? What should that room know,

 

That room will get to hear all it needs to when its convened at an EGM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The emails asking for an EGM went out at the end of June, 6 weeks ago?  Surely an EGM would of been called by now if the numbers were there, especially as everyone wanted the EGM?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to the operational rules, the RFL see's the need for them, BARLA see the need for them, every other sport has them?  Why the nashing of teeth? 

 

RU restricted RL players less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The emails asking for an EGM went out at the end of June, 6 weeks ago?  Surely an EGM would of been called by now if the numbers were there, especially as everyone wanted the EGM?

 

Not strictly true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not strictly true.

The posting on here was on the 23rd June?  Copying an email sent to all clubs?  Does it take that long to sort an EGM?  If so it sort of highlights a problem in the emergency bit of the name?

 

That thread went quiet but I'm sure its all in hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The posting on here was on the 23rd June?  Copying an email sent to all clubs?  Does it take that long to sort an EGM?  If so it sort of highlights a problem in the emergency bit of the name?

 

That thread went quiet but I'm sure its all in hand.

 

Your correct BR..........its all in hand  ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The posting on here was on the 23rd June?  Copying an email sent to all clubs?  Does it take that long to sort an EGM?  If so it sort of highlights a problem in the emergency bit of the name?

 

That thread went quiet but I'm sure its all in hand.

Committee men/women go on Holidays as well, you know the same problem that is stopping summer clubs being at full strength.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the changes would affect them?

Seriously, if some of the professional committee politicians on here put their petty grievances, malignant politicking and ludicrous lack of judgement reference the relative importance of different issues to one side, the game would be thriving at all levels.

The RFL and above them the RLIF should be the sole point(s) of authority for the UK game. Any other bodies should be advisory only.

Think you need to go and buy a copy of this weeks league express ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The emails asking for an EGM went out at the end of June, 6 weeks ago? Surely an EGM would of been called by now if the numbers were there, especially as everyone wanted the EGM?

They got an email back from the NWC management telling them what they had to do in accordance with the constitution. They didn't do it and the ordinary meeting came and went, during which certain individuals spent their time thumbing through their copy handbooks wondering what to do. Not sure who's inbox the NWC email had been sat in between the time it was sent and the NWC meeting, but it was a couple of weeks at least.

LC keeps saying its a in hand but unless they get the agreement of 30% of the NWC club secretarys and EGM ain't going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - June 2017

League Express - Mon 17th July 2017