Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

JohnM

The price of a cyclist's life: 240 hours unpaid work

142 posts in this topic

No, I'm suggesting that a responsible cyclist wouldn't choose to cycle down a very busy dual carriageway at a peak time on one of the busiest days of the year

 

But if that's the direction they're heading in and that's the time they need to travel and that's the best way to get there ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As ever after these threads I did a little count on my way home.  This is from just 15 minutes walking by along one road.

 

Number of cars passing through a red light: 2

Number of cars turning without indicating: 4

Number of cars crossing a zebra crossing which had people on: 1

Number of motorists using a phone: 3

 

Number of bikes passing through a red light: 2

Number of bikes turning without indicating: 0

Number of bikes crossing a zebra crossing which had people on: 0

Number of cyclists using a phone: 0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I'm suggesting that a responsible cyclist wouldn't choose to cycle down a very busy dual carriageway at a peak time on one of the busiest days of the year. Apart from being unsafe it's downright ignorant. It's not about blame its about making sensible choices.

How is it ignorant?

If people drive in accordance with the law why would it be unsafe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is it ignorant?

If people drive in accordance with the law why would it be unsafe?

 

Just imagine how angry he must get following a tractor or a horse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or a hearse.

 

I just hope there's not a procession.

 

At least not on the A64 when some people want to drive like really fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is it ignorant?

If people drive in accordance with the law why would it be unsafe?

The environment and location are unsafe, not necessarily their manner of riding. There's a big difference.

Again, I'm simply questioning why any sane person would expose themself to such a risk. If they wish to do so then fine, that's their right, but don't cry about it if the risk materialises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The environment and location are unsafe, not necessarily their manner of riding. There's a big difference.

Again, I'm simply questioning why any sane person would expose themself to such a risk. If they wish to do so then fine, that's their right, but don't cry about it if the risk materialises.

Good Lord.

You should be a defence lawyer in rape cases, and highlight the length of the victim's skirt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As ever after these threads I did a little count on my way home.  This is from just 15 minutes walking by along one road.

 

Number of cars passing through a red light: 2

Number of cars turning without indicating: 4

Number of cars crossing a zebra crossing which had people on: 1

Number of motorists using a phone: 3

 

Number of bikes passing through a red light: 2

Number of bikes turning without indicating: 0

Number of bikes crossing a zebra crossing which had people on: 0

Number of cyclists using a phone: 0

What was the ratio of cars to bicycles ? 100:1 ? 1000:1? Does it really come as a shock that motorists have a higher volume of incidents than cyclists ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the ratio of cars to bicycles ? 100:1 ? 1000:1? Does it really come as a shock that motorists have a higher volume of incidents than cyclists ?

Probably nearer 10:1.

How many cars can go through red lights before we accept there is a genuine problem with careless and dangerous motorists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably nearer 10:1.

How many cars can go through red lights before we accept there is a genuine problem with careless and dangerous motorists.

The police don't give two hoots about motoring offences, the gap in my fence is testimony to it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Lord.

You should be a defence lawyer in rape cases, and highlight the length of the victim's skirt.

You are deranged. If you can't see that cycling and high-speed roads with many cars, HGVs etc on them aren't a good combination then you need help. Motorists speed on those types of road, it's a fact of life, therefore accidents will happen. I'm neither condoning or defending that, just accepting it as a fact. So, if you as a cyclist think motorists drive too fast and are all idiots then why would you voluntarily put yourself at even greater risk from their incompetence ? Cyclists are going to be even more vulnerable on those roads than anywhere else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are deranged. If you can't see that cycling and high-speed roads with many cars, HGVs etc on them aren't a good combination then you need help. Motorists speed on those types of road, it's a fact of life, therefore accidents will happen. I'm neither condoning or defending that, just accepting it as a fact. So, if you as a cyclist think motorists drive too fast and are all idiots then why would you voluntarily put yourself at even greater risk from their incompetence ? Cyclists are going to be even more vulnerable on those roads than anywhere else.

 

Build decent cycle infrastructure (and indeed better pedestrian infrastructure) and you will reduce motorised traffic congestion & stop those cyclists getting in your way.

 

Win/win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are deranged. If you can't see that cycling and high-speed roads with many cars, HGVs etc on them aren't a good combination then you need help. Motorists speed on those types of road, it's a fact of life, therefore accidents will happen. I'm neither condoning or defending that, just accepting it as a fact. So, if you as a cyclist think motorists drive too fast and are all idiots then why would you voluntarily put yourself at even greater risk from their incompetence ? Cyclists are going to be even more vulnerable on those roads than anywhere else.

Women are stupid for leaving the house when sex offenders could be lurking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The environment and location are unsafe, not necessarily their manner of riding. There's a big difference.

Again, I'm simply questioning why any sane person would expose themself to such a risk. If they wish to do so then fine, that's their right, but don't cry about it if the risk materialises.

The location is fine, it's the bad drivers that make it dangerous. The solution to this problem is to educate drivers, not stop cyclists from using the roads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can this thread be locked now please? The Jeremy clarksons of the forum have now proved that any accident involving a cyclist is the cyclist's fault. The huge metal penis substitutes they drive round are obviously incapable of doing any harm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I'm suggesting that a responsible cyclist wouldn't choose to cycle down a very busy dual carriageway at a peak time on one of the busiest days of the year. Apart from being unsafe it's downright ignorant. It's not about blame its about making sensible choices.

As an ardent cyclist this is my way of thinking. Just because I have a right, or I am within the law does not mean that I am safe or comfortable

I am lucky my commute is to the countryside, but when I cycle I have two options

1 ride down a busy dual carriageway with a motorway roundabout at the end - 12 miles

2 ride down rural country roads which snake arround the dual carriageway and miss the motorway roundabout - 18 miles

I chose option 2 it is by far a more pleasant ride although it adds about 15 mins to my journey, oh and because I only hit a town at the end I always wait inline in traffic in the primary postion and never kerb crawl. This tactic works in that almost all the drivers respect your patience and give you the same room as a car, because let's face it cyclist get annoyed at car drivers inpatience

When I got out on a weekend ride I plan my ride to avoid main arterial routes, and stick to yellow and brown roads (OS landranger)

As a cyclist you must not forget why you are cycling,for enjoyment, there is no joy in being passed within a couple of feet by 2 tons of metal travelling at 70 mph. Cyclists want respect from other road users, but some fail to appreciate that respect should be a two way attitude.

BUT this has thread has been derailed by cycling trolls. In this case There was no issue of the cyclist being at fault in this case and I did state earlier that in some incidents cyclist MAY be culpable, but definitely not in this case.

I would like to ask all the posters on this thread to leave the generalisations behind for one post and say if they thought in this case the cyclist was at fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Women are stupid for leaving the house when sex offenders could be lurking.

Err pretty cheap shot that, sex offences are still quite rare in that they tend to make the national news, whereas cyclist deaths are just regional issues.

If (as the daily mail would have us believe) there is a sexual deviant on every corner, who on conviction got a community service sentence then yes, I would recommend that girls didn't wear short skirts etc. Derwent wasn't suggesting that the cyclist were wrong, just pointing out that they were putting themselves at risk due to the lack of deterrent that exists if a car kills them. So the car drivers will drive with impunity, until a real deterrent is actioned upon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Err pretty cheap shot that, sex offences are still quite rare in that they tend to make the national news, whereas cyclist deaths are just regional issues.

If (as the daily mail would have us believe) there is a sexual deviant on every corner, who on conviction got a community service sentence then yes, I would recommend that girls didn't wear short skirts etc. Derwent wasn't suggesting that the cyclist were wrong, just pointing out that they were putting themselves at risk due to the lack of deterrent that exists if a car kills them. So the car drivers will drive with impunity, until a real deterrent is actioned upon.

What's the conviction rate on rape cases these days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the conviction rate on rape cases these days?

Fair point

Edit: Am I allowed to do this or should I just go of on a pedantic rant about grammar. And move the point away from this to something totally irrelevant to the OP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Can this thread be locked now please? The Jeremy clarksons of the forum have now proved that any accident involving a cyclist is the cyclist's fault. The huge metal penis substitutes they drive round are obviously incapable of doing any harm.

Jeez, talk about being a drama queen.

Nobody is suggesting anything of the sort, and quite clearly and unequivocally the driver was at fault in the incident that started this thread.

The point, which you and Rhubarbtriangulist seem to have missed by some distance, is that a lot of drivers show little regard for other road users (including other drivers) at the best of times. So, given that cyclists are the most vulnerable road user of all, surely its up to them to take additional precautions regarding their own safety in the knowledge that nobody else will. Whether they should have to is a different issue altogether, but the reality is that they need to. Yes in a perfect world all road users would show each other courtesy and not endanger each other but that doesn't and never will happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Build decent cycle infrastructure (and indeed better pedestrian infrastructure) and you will reduce motorised traffic congestion & stop those cyclists getting in your way.

 

Win/win.

No arguments on the point about infrastructure.

On your second point, its not about cyclists getting in anyone's way. Living in rural Cumbria I am well used to dealing with slow moving vehicles as a fact of life. It is about their safety and risk mitigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other side of the coin, I was recently strolling alongside the River Mersey with family members when a dozen cyclists came roaring past at speed. Other families with children had to quickly get out of the way. I have been since and must admit there are many cyclists who are totally inconsiderate to those walking. It's very scary when a cyclist brushes past you at speed without any warning. I, too, have been a cyclist in my time but always showed consideration when near to walkers. 

 

As for the cyclists in Krakow! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Returning to the OP, would a custodial sentence really be appropriate for what was a momentary lapse in concentration? I’m sure we’re all guilty of that at some time or other whilst driving, I know I am. But fortunately when it has happened to me the consequences have been nowhere near as serious. I know it lead to a tragic loss of life, but from what I’ve read in the report there was absolutely no malice or wilful negligence involved and the drive has demonstrated great remorse. 

 

Compare this case with the one I posted about the coach crash that claimed three lives. In this case there was wilful negligence clearly demonstrated on behalf of the coach operator (one of the tyres was 19 years old!) and yet the sentence was still ridiculously light. Strangely there has been very little outrage or condemnation of this on here. Why? This incident was far worse IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - June 2017

League Express - Mon 17th July 2017