Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

weloveyouwakefield2

Salford's surprise signing is..

94 posts in this topic

How classless can one man be. Not even announced and he's named a horse after him. Can't stand the bloke and hope it all goes pearshaped at Salford next season.

How very sad for you then. Dr K is just the sort of person we want in rugby league. Just consider how much more interesting Salford have been since he bought them. There is a real chance that Salford could compete for something next year, which is a massive step forward. If I was unlucky enough to be a Salford fan, I'd be quite looking forward to 2014.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How classless can one man be. Not even announced and he's named a horse after him. Can't stand the bloke and hope it all goes pearshaped at Salford next season.

Dearie me Snapski - think outside of Cas for a minute. The Dr has helped to stabilise Cas & Wakey by paying (unheard of nowadays) transfer fees to the CLUBS. It stays in the game not in a players pocket. We need many more Koukash`s in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to the guy who told me this earlier today to tell him looks like it ain't true and he told me its still happening and that rejection was days ago. ! Will see hey. You seem to disapprove of anything i put on here yet i guess you'll find out in a few days.

I know now!

It is not happening

I suggest you find a new source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the 'sugar daddy' comments quite poor from people in official roles. It reads a little like feeling sorry for yourself.

 

The biggest and best clubs are the biggest and best clubs because they are run the best - irrespective of a sugar daddy.

Think you're being over sensitive but now you've brought it up,

Do you honestly think Warrington would be we're they are without Morans money or willingness to underwright the profitable initiatives that have helped wire become sustainable.

Would Huddersfield be looking at winning the LLS without Davy's money behind them, seriously, on crowds of 6,000 or 7,000?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you're being over sensitive but now you've brought it up,

Do you honestly think Warrington would be we're they are without Morans money or willingness to underwright the profitable initiatives that have helped wire become sustainable.

Would Huddersfield be looking at winning the LLS without Davy's money behind them, seriously, on crowds of 6,000 or 7,000?

maybe, maybe not.

I do suspect though that quite often lower clubs have had at least as much shareholder investment as clubs with so-called sugar daddies.

We know that Wilkinson at Salford and Hudgell (?) at KR have invested millions for example, but because the infrastructures of those clubs werent great that investment was just to pay bills. Same with Hughes and others at London.

Morans investment was able to be spent on nice additional things to drive the club forward due to a whole range of other things being right about the club, including local investment, good crowds and strong management.

Weaker clubs fail due to poor infrastructure not lack of sugar daddy. Clubs with sugar daddies still fail if the infrastructure is not right - that is my point, and Wakefield blaming a lack of sugar daddy for their woes is a poor excuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weaker clubs fail due to poor infrastructure not lack of sugar daddy. Clubs with sugar daddies still fail if the infrastructure is not right - that is my point, and Wakefield blaming a lack of sugar daddy for their woes is a poor excuse.

 

Not for me. Don't want to list them all but most clubs who have failed cannot plug financial gaps of typically £half a million.

 

Without the money being gifted either they overspend to win games and keep the crowds up and get into debt deeper, or they cut the playing budget and lose games and the fans drift off and they spiral down anyway. Wakefield's sale of Tim Smith is to plug the gap in the finances. Had Moran been at Wakefield he'd have been buying in such as Chase.

 

To me the economics are simple, all M62 clubs have a sum they need to get to to buy a competitive team. They need a nice ground to maximise the fans and the take from the fans, and if that isn't enough they need a private input of cash to make up the shortfall.

I don't understand what income "infrastructure" creates for a club unless you mean a modern ground. Wire have managed to get their's Castleford for instance haven't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It also leaves us without a big name full back ( although I would be perfectly happy with Niall Evalds)

 

Marc Sneyd has spent a large part of the season at full back, so another option is to keep him at the club. Hope so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Federation trained is that they spent 3 seasons basically with a SL team before they were 21. Club trained is that they spent it with that club. Jordan Davies probably wasn't with a SL team for 3 seasons before he was 21 so should be non-federation trained. There may be some work around, but the idea is to encourage clubs to produce their own players & clearly Jordan Davies isn't a product of the Salford system.

 

Is there any exemption for players rescued from RU?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not for me. Don't want to list them all but most clubs who have failed cannot plug financial gaps of typically £half a million.

 

Without the money being gifted either they overspend to win games and keep the crowds up and get into debt deeper, or they cut the playing budget and lose games and the fans drift off and they spiral down anyway. Wakefield's sale of Tim Smith is to plug the gap in the finances. Had Moran been at Wakefield he'd have been buying in such as Chase.

 

To me the economics are simple, all M62 clubs have a sum they need to get to to buy a competitive team. They need a nice ground to maximise the fans and the take from the fans, and if that isn't enough they need a private input of cash to make up the shortfall.

I don't understand what income "infrastructure" creates for a club unless you mean a modern ground. Wire have managed to get their's Castleford for instance haven't.

 

Without wishing to put words in someone else's mouth (and yet doing exactly that). I'd guess the other correspondent was using the term 'infrastructure' in the broadest sense to include the way the club conducts itself in its relations with its supporters and the wider community, rather than just referring to tangible assets like the stadium. Off the top of my head I'd include things like having atttractive merchandise available, having an on-line presence, making tickets easy to obtain, having an attractive 'matchday experience', that kind of stuff. Behind the scenes, ensuring that the training facilities are top notch to help attract better players. It all costs money, and clubs without money tend to leave these behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not for me. Don't want to list them all but most clubs who have failed cannot plug financial gaps of typically £half a million.

Without the money being gifted either they overspend to win games and keep the crowds up and get into debt deeper, or they cut the playing budget and lose games and the fans drift off and they spiral down anyway. Wakefield's sale of Tim Smith is to plug the gap in the finances. Had Moran been at Wakefield he'd have been buying in such as Chase.

To me the economics are simple, all M62 clubs have a sum they need to get to to buy a competitive team. They need a nice ground to maximise the fans and the take from the fans, and if that isn't enough they need a private input of cash to make up the shortfall.

I don't understand what income "infrastructure" creates for a club unless you mean a modern ground. Wire have managed to get their's Castleford for instance haven't.

the fact there are large gaps is exactly my point. the best clubs have large turnovers irrespective of 'sugar daddies'.

tbh it sounds like we were agreeing and you missed my point slightly.

if Moran was at Wakefield he'd probably have to spend his investment plugging the gap just like Hughes at London and Hudgell at KR and Wilkinson at Salford. I wouldnt be surprised to hear that they had spent more than Moran.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without wishing to put words in someone else's mouth (and yet doing exactly that). I'd guess the other correspondent was using the term 'infrastructure' in the broadest sense to include the way the club conducts itself in its relations with its supporters and the wider community, rather than just referring to tangible assets like the stadium. Off the top of my head I'd include things like having atttractive merchandise available, having an on-line presence, making tickets easy to obtain, having an attractive 'matchday experience', that kind of stuff. Behind the scenes, ensuring that the training facilities are top notch to help attract better players. It all costs money, and clubs without money tend to leave these behind.

correct John, thanks.

Anyway apologies for taking this ott somewhat.

Exciting times for Salford, looking forward to more detail coming out next week.

I do hope that the fans get behind them and are patient. I remember when we signed Langer, Gee and Nikau and were still rubbish. There are no guarantees of success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know now!

It is not happening

I suggest you find a new source

haha

 

I really wish I could tell you the source, then you might believe me!! Not bothered whether you doubt me or not, just tryingt o clear up some of the rumours for more solid facts from the horses mouth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that if the majority of the strongly rumoured signings come off I'd be suspicious that Salford would be breaching the cap. I know the likes of Leeds and Wire have a lot of big name players, but they're big clubs who constantly challenge for silverware, so players would likely sign smaller contracts to be there. Salford aren't a big side and a lot of their appeal for players must surely be large contracts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

It also leaves us without a big name full back ( although I would be perfectly happy with Niall Evalds)

 

 

Lance Hohaia - NZ international fullback

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lance Hohaia - NZ international fullback

 

Chris Sandow. SH for the Eels to play FB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris Sandow. SH for the Eels to play FB

  I am beginning to think you are Neil Barker. :onthequiet:

  If,on Thursday,Chris Sandow is on the link,from the rehab clinic,and he has signed for Salford,it will be the biggest shock,for me,for over the last 12 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tbh i dont know nothing about him as I havent followed NRL for a while in any great detail, its just the name I was told about. Strieks me as odd that hes always played int eh halves, to come as a FB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that if the majority of the strongly rumoured signings come off I'd be suspicious that Salford would be breaching the cap. I know the likes of Leeds and Wire have a lot of big name players, but they're big clubs who constantly challenge for silverware, so players would likely sign smaller contracts to be there. Salford aren't a big side and a lot of their appeal for players must surely be large contracts?

 

If all the rumours were correct Koukash would be unveiling a squad of 35 , thats why rumours are called ......rumours , best way would be to wait two more days and hear it ' from the horses mouth ' .

Post announcement before the avalanche  of Salary cap experts converge onto the forum to cry ' foul play ' . remember that Salford were assett stripped in 2012 & over the close season with all their high wage earners departed or retired - Patten - Moon . Matty Smith , Holdsworth , other higher contracted players were let go - Paleaasina -Vinnie Anderson - Adamson. 

The remainder of the squad a high proportion  will not be retained or have been let go already:- another 10-12 further players.

The end result salford  will be left with a nucleus of young Academy Players , the recent signings - Griffin - Emmitt , and more available Salary cap to spend than any other SL club , and spent it they will .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 10th April 2017

Rugby League World - April 2017