Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Larry the Leit

Who should replace Wakefield Trinity in Superleague 2014 ?

41 posts in this topic

Yep! Not sure on timescales, but as I understand it, only a small part of the site can be developed until after the stadium has been built, so there are financial drivers for others to build the stadium. However with the current economic situation, it's not going to be a priority for development in the very short-term.

 

But form a financing and long term loaning of investment monies now is the "best of times" with historically low interest rates on the financial markets.  It will never be so favourable a time as the financial markets will move soon with the improved economic conditions.

 

If it doesn't make financial sense now it never will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

with the way super league is going we will be lucky to have 12 team by 2015.It seem every other week theres a club in crisis this year. We have bradford , salford , rumblings at hull kr and now wakefield not to mention london. I think the sooner we cut to 12 the the better and lets the teams who cant compete drop down. If feateherstone can prove there finances let them come up give them ago, before there investors get bored and walk away in frustration.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12? The sooner we cut to 10 the better. Maybe even fewer.

Leeds

Wigan

Warrington

Sts

Hull

Cats

Huddersfield

Hull KR

A.N. Other French Club

Combined Cumbrian Team (let people whine but do it anyway)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12? The sooner we cut to 10 the better. Maybe even fewer.

Leeds

Wigan

Warrington

Sts

Hull

Cats

Huddersfield

Hull KR

A.N. Other French Club

Combined Cumbrian Team (let people whine but do it anyway)

I agree with ten Ive been bang that drum for years hence my chat name but people seem to be against it while clubs are struggling along. Ten seems right its just a matter of which ten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you have both Hull clubs and then insist on a combined Cumbrian team??

Because you've got to start somewhere. It doesn't have to be a combined Cumbrian team, it could be Wakefield/whoever, but at some point the clubs who currently are the most "successful" are going to have to cut bait from the rest in order to grow. I've become disillusioned not by the game but by the sheer stupidity in trying to please everyone all the time and this is what this 8x3 nonsense is.

I'd make punishments ridiculously punitive; players not paid - their contracts are null and void, non-payment of taxes - instant relegation that kind of thing.

Failure is tolerated because people are scared of how it looks, heartstrings are tugged with the premise that 34 blokes playing catch with an oval ball actually matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

leigh..........

Ive alway's liked Leigh .Ive alway's found their fans very friendly and chatty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12? The sooner we cut to 10 the better. Maybe even fewer.

Leeds

Wigan

Warrington

Sts

Hull

Cats

Huddersfield

Hull KR

A.N. Other French Club

Combined Cumbrian Team (let people whine but do it anyway)

 

Why would you exclude a cashed up Salford, with an investor and a new stadium and recruiting players aplenty and catering to the Manunian megapolis.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you exclude a cashed up Salford, with an investor and a new stadium and recruiting players aplenty and catering to the Manunian megapolis.?

See. This is what I'm talking about, why not them? why them? It doesn't matter which 8,9,10 but you're better off starting with the "bigger" clubs then take it from there. Salford have been catering to the Mancunian metropolis for years and they've done little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carter will have set his budget and he has announced that the U19s will go full time next year.

That will bring quite an increase in costs I'd have thought so he must be certain that he can afford it.

I know they started a lottery or similar to fund the U19s, maybe it's that income which has decided Carter he can afford it. Otherwise the U19s full time is out of context with the message in the statement.

 

 

They will be full time college students who as part of their course will benefit from full time training its a college set up by the club plus the lottery funds the development of the younger players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They will be full time college students who as part of their course will benefit from full time training its a college set up by the club plus the lottery funds the development of the younger players.

Presumably as a college, Wakey get a fee for every full- time student studying there. Is that how it works?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See. This is what I'm talking about, why not them? why them? It doesn't matter which 8,9,10 but you're better off starting with the "bigger" clubs then take it from there. Salford have been catering to the Mancunian metropolis for years and they've done little.

 

You were talking money by advocating a reduction to 10 which gives each of the ten approx £2.5M more money.

 

Then you advocate a combined Cumbria where none of the directors have any money to put in, so that will fail on low crowds, whilst excluding Salford whose director has and is putting in £Millions before you very eyes.

 

You also exclude the Wakefield area in which there are 20,000 RL fans who'll pay to watch the SL game

 

Of course the 8,9,10 matters.

 

If combining clubs is part of your solution Hull/HKR, Cas/Fev/Wakey, Bradford/Halifax/Hudds etc etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(1)You were talking money by advocating a reduction to 10 which gives each of the ten approx £2.5M more money.

 

(2)Then you advocate a combined Cumbria where none of the directors have any money to put in, so that will fail on low crowds, whilst excluding Salford whose director has and is putting in £Millions before you very eyes.

 

(3)You also exclude the Wakefield area in which there are 20,000 RL fans who'll pay to watch the SL game

 

(4)Of course the 8,9,10 matters.

 

(5)If combining clubs is part of your solution Hull/HKR, Cas/Fev/Wakey, Bradford/Halifax/Hudds etc etc.

(1) Where did i talk money?

(2) I wasn't clear, I didn't mean a merger. Still, if everyone's getting an extra £2.5m that'll help. So far he's bought Adrian Morley.

(3)Yes, I excluded them from my initial list, yet there they are a couple of posts later. So, thats almost half of the 20k back, now if only they can pay their bills.

(4) Not really if you're having a "year zero", but wait, oh look, there it is; 

 It doesn't matter which 8,9,10 but you're better off starting with the "bigger" clubs then take it from there 

 

(5)So it's everyone or no-one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worryingly, I had heard a couple of months ago from someone generally in the know about things that SL would be down to 12 teams next year (losing London and Wakefield). This was round about the time of talk of a winding up petition (http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/news/12208/8823779/Super-League-Wakefield-Wildcats-Andrew-Glover-allays-winding-up-order-fears), but I'd already read the statement allaying the fears and figured it would be OK. Perhaps not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why should anyone replace Wakefield in any event? Any substitute club from the Championship is sure to be in a worse position.

 

Anyway, let nature take its course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(1) Where did i talk money?...........(2)  if everyone's getting an extra £2.5m that'll help.

 

Not really if you're having a "year zero"

 

By advocating 10 clubs your talking a solution that gives the remainder more money.

 

Year Zero would be nice. Roll all the fans and clubs up to one in Hull, three each in Yorks/Lancs two in France and bankroll a top London club. But neither the fans or the chairmen who are fans with money, will wear it and so IMHO the best solution is one that the "clubs" supporters themselves scupper.

 

That's the problem with dragging 100 years of history behind us I suppose?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



Rugby League World - April 2017

League Express - Mon 10th April 2017