Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Larry the Leit

Murderer should be shown leniency says a posh bloke that's never met him.

111 posts in this topic

since forever in any conflict you can name

 

they are still digging up the bodies of the 'disappeared' in Northern Ireland

 

when does the savage urge born out of training and experience, to kill your enemy, an enemy who hates you and wants to kill you: and the urge to show mercy to a damaged fellow human being end and begin? It's a grey area

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course he should be shown leniency. After all, he's a 'hero'. Right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you train people to be dispassionate about killing, then don't be surprised when they kill people dispassionately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kill your enemy or be killed by your enemy should be the motto of war.

War is silly and big business yet look's like the PC brigade is going on in the battlefield's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kill your enemy or be killed by your enemy should be the motto of war.

War is silly and big business yet look's like the PC brigade is going on in the battlefield's.

I think in this case the enemy wasn't really in a position to kill anyone, what with the marines able to do a comedy sketch and make a home movie while stood over him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This PC brigade, are they armed?

Yes with banner's/sandal's/PHD's and ticket's for a working class SWP book fair ?.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shooting a defenceless, injured combatant; isn't this a war crime?

Yes, that's why he is being punished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shooting a defenceless, injured combatant; isn't this a war crime?

If it was the other way round do you think the Taliban fighter's would been more lenient ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24877081

Awful story really. I wonder how widespread this type of crime is and has been in the conflict zones over the past few decades.

This squaddie wasn't caught because his colleagues turned him in, which to me should see them dismissed from the army.

He is being punished and he deserves to be punished but few of us on this board have been in his situation and we should not be too critical of the views of people who have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was the other way round do you think the Taliban fighter's would been more lenient ?

No, but isn't that what we are supposed to be fighting against?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is being punished and he deserves to be punished but few of us on this board have been in his situation and we should not be too critical of the views of people who have.

A professional soldier acted contrary to the Geneva convention and against his training. I think that's worthy of a heap of criticism, and the mug on the radio this morning who wasn't even familiar with the facts called for leniency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think people are trained to shoot dead injured defenseless people Frank.

no they aren't: they are trained to shoot people...the circumstances in which they shoot them aren't defined.

and I'm not trying to legitimise the actions of this man far from it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A professional soldier acted contrary to the Geneva convention and against his training. I think that's worthy of a heap of criticism, and the mug on the radio this morning who wasn't even familiar with the facts called for leniency.

He is being punished that's more than criticism. I can't see how he can avoid jail and dismissal.

However whether or not the general is familiar with the specifics, I'm sure he is more familiar than almost anybody here with the pressures that soldiers are under out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was the other way round do you think the Taliban fighter's would been more lenient ?

we are supposed to be better than the taliban, that's supposed to be the whole point

 

however the idea of warfare is to destroy your enemy and military personel are hyped up to do just that when they are in action.

I empathise with Larry's point, but recognise the grey areas involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but isn't that what we are supposed to be fighting against?

No, we went out to fight against Al Qaeda. God knows what we are fighting for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kill your enemy or be killed by your enemy should be the motto of war.

War is silly and big business yet look's like the PC brigade is going on in the battlefield's.

poor literacy skills I can live with

but rank silliness along with triteness is another issue altogether.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shooting a defenceless, injured combatant; isn't this a war crime?

what should the punishment be for a sniper who kills a Taliban member from over a mile away with a high powered rifle? after all the Taliban member is defenceless against that attack, and poses no risk to the sniper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what should the punishment be for a sniper who kills a Taliban member from over a mile away with a high powered rifle? after all the Taliban member is defenceless against that attack, and poses no risk to the sniper.

I'm pretty sure snipers aren't tasked with killing the seriously injured.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what should the punishment be for a sniper who kills a Taliban member from over a mile away with a high powered rifle? after all the Taliban member is defenceless against that attack, and poses no risk to the sniper.

 

But that combatant has not been captured by the accused and under his control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what should the punishment be for a sniper who kills a Taliban member from over a mile away with a high powered rifle?

 

It would rather depend why he was shooting him.  The punishment could range from the Victoria Cross to life imprisonment, depending.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 24th July 2017

Rugby League World - August 2017