Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ckn

UKIP and Nigel Farage

228 posts in this topic

Don't you mean "coloured"

No, he meant "supermarket".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they don't all come here ...

 

Bcv1NXVIUAAQH-q.jpg

I am going to stick up for Jon, perhaps because I assume we are both from the same immigrant stock.

 

Accepting you graph, would it be fair to say that it is good that it is shared round?  Would there be issues if all asylum seekers realized that driving on the right is daft and that there is only one country in Europe that makes decent tea and curry (thanks to previous immigration)?  It seems reasonable to say that sharing or new arrivals is generally for the best, particularly if that is the choice of the people seeking asylum/refuge?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to stick up for Jon, perhaps because I assume we are both from the same immigrant stock.

 

Accepting you graph, would it be fair to say that it is good that it is shared round?  Would there be issues if all asylum seekers realized that driving on the right is daft and that there is only one country in Europe that makes decent tea and curry (thanks to previous immigration)?  It seems reasonable to say that sharing or new arrivals is generally for the best, particularly if that is the choice of the people seeking asylum/refuge?

 

I'm happy that asylym seekers go first to where there is quality handball.

 

And Belgium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy that asylym seekers go first to where there is quality handball.

 

And Belgium.

Racist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not really understand your point or having anything clever to write, so I just threw that in.

 

Sorry about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the scale of Jon's graphic is misleading

 

Sweden:

Population: ~10million

Asylum Seekers: 4590 per million of population = ~ 45,900

 

UK:

Population: ~60million

Asylum Seekers: 440 per million of population = ~ 26,400

 

1975-2010 figures indicate the accelerating scale of the financial burden on the UK.

 

 

http://www.irr.org.uk/research/statistics/asylum/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the scale of Jon's graphic is misleading

Sweden:

Population: ~10million

Asylum Seekers: 4590 per million of population = ~ 45,900

UK:

Population: ~60million

Asylum Seekers: 440 per million of population = ~ 26,400

1975-2010 figures indicate the accelerating scale of the financial burden on the UK.

http://www.irr.org.uk/research/statistics/asylum/

What was misleading about the graph. Very simple to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't muzzle the hounds...muzzle the huntsmen and women.

I realise that balance is not the forum's forte but here goes. For balance; muzzle the illegal hare coursers who plague lincolnshire at this time of year...but i forget...they aren't upper class ##### ..oops ...twits .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't muzzle the hounds...muzzle the huntsmen and women.

I realise that balance is not the forum's forte but here goes. For balance; muzzle the illegal hare coursers who plague lincolnshire at this time of year...but i forget...they aren't upper class ##### ..oops ...twits .

I agree, John.  It is not as though hare coursing it legal though, it is illegal.

 

Even though they aren't upper class ##### ..oops ...twits .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either way, a proportion of my taxes is going to foreign spongers who contribute knack all to this country.

 

As for your claim that most Bangladeshis are asylum seekers; I suspect that it's you who don't know what you are talking about. Bangladesh is a constitutional democracy.

 

Doesn't your heart bleed for these pour souls.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2383868/Bogus-ID-gang-let-250-Bangladeshi-immigrants-exploit-UK-benefits-gold-mine.html

I didn't say most Bangladeshis were asylum seekers

Whether they are or not they have scarcely the advantages of the new Zealanders and eastern European immigrants 

 

This country has a proud history of giving shelter to foreign spongers

Perhaps the Jewish children fleeing Hitler in the thirties, the Hungarians fleeing the ruthless backlash of the uprising in1956, the Ugandan Asians in the 70s should have been left to their fate. There were those who thought so at the time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

People from Bangladesh come from impoverished third world countries with poor education and have poor if any English skills. They are probably asylum seekers not mmigrants

 

 

I didn't say most Bangladeshis were asylum seekers

 

 

Says it all, really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was misleading about the graph. Very simple to read.

 

 

The graphics compare the proportion of immigrants to population in Sweden and the Uk.

 

The  graphic block diagram for Sweden is ten times the size of the UK one.

 

In terms of actual immigrants arriving, it would only be double the size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The graphics compare the proportion of immigrants to population in Sweden and the Uk.

The graphic block diagram for Sweden is ten times the size of the UK one.

In terms of actual immigrants arriving, it would only be double the size.

Oh dear.

Yes, but the chart is designed to display the former NOT the latter. If you really need the latter graphically representing you can draw that chart with your crayons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Says it all, really.

You are right

But my error hardly detracts from the central point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

Oh dear.

Yes, but the chart is designed to display the former NOT the latter. If you really need the latter graphically representing you can draw that chart with your crayons.

 

 

The chart is designed to camouflage the latter.

 

Is that a subtle way of telling everyone that you got some crayons for Christmas?

;)B)

Share this post


Link to post

The graphics compare the proportion of immigrants to population in Sweden and the Uk.

 

The  graphic block diagram for Sweden is ten times the size of the UK one.

 

In terms of actual immigrants arriving, it would only be double the size.

 

But in terms of impact on a country the numbers in relation to population are the important bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

 

But my error hardly detracts from the central point

 

which is ....

 

 

 

 

This country has a proud history of giving shelter to foreign spongers

 

Share this post


Link to post

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

But in terms of impact on a country the numbers in relation to population are the important bit.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

Anyway Nigel says only Syrian Christians should be allowed in

Share this post


Link to post

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

 

which is ....

 

 

 

 

This country has a proud history of giving shelter to foreign spongers

 

 

Correct

The Jewish kids should have been made to stay in Germany and be gassed

Share this post


Link to post

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

So now you're calling Jews spongers ... but not, apparently, Somalis and Bangladeshis.

 

That'll go down well where you live

Share this post


Link to post

Posted · Hidden by ckn, December 31, 2013 - No reason given

So now you're calling Jews spongers ... but not, apparently, Somalis and Bangladeshis.

 

That'll go down well where you live

I'm calling nobody anything

It's you that's doing that and you include the jewish children and families who were given shelter here in the thirties

Share this post


Link to post

:D  :D  :D

 

One major error in that article:  "Mr Bloom’s chief crime was to have hit a journalist on the head with a Ukip brochure."  He didn't hit a journalist, he hit Michael Crick...and nowhere near hard enough,

 

​I wonder, though. the anti-Cameron forces try to recruit Farage as the man most likely, too. that would be good as it would marginalise the loony right, leaving the main party to get on with the job and making the Coalition more effective.

 

Anyway, what is a Torty? A party member? A voter? or those Old Labourites who are anti-immigration, anti-EU?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 10th April 2017

Rugby League World - April 2017