Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Bleep1673

McDermott & London

40 posts in this topic

As long as it takes?

 

Considering half the clubs in the traditional areas are complete basket cases after over a 100yrs, you are certainly right!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering half the clubs in the traditional areas are complete basket cases after over a 100yrs, you are certainly right!

Yes but they're heartland clubs, you're not allowed to discuss them in the same way. You don't get this, do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't get this, do you?

 

I do; I just like to buck the trend and actually bring a bit of common sense and reality to the discussion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do; I just like to buck the trend and actually bring a bit of common sense and reality to the discussion!

Good luck with that! It's a noble quest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but they're heartland clubs, you're not allowed to discuss them in the same way. You don't get this, do you?

Indeed. You wouldn't get anywhere arguing that Rochdale should be given a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

London should be given as long as any founder club that is still going, that gives them longer than any of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

London should be given as long as any founder club that is still going, that gives them longer than any of them.

I don't think that McDermott was arguing that Broncos should be allowed to exist just as Rochdale or Batley exist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that McDermott was arguing that Broncos should be allowed to exist just as Rochdale or Batley exist. 

My post was aimed elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BM argues not to judge London by the fact that the professional team aren't that successful and see the wider picture. Good luck with that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

How much help has the RFL given to the Bulls in recent years compared to London?

Would the RFL have bought the lease of Londons ground like it did Bradfords?

Would the RFL have advanced London money like they did the Bulls?

 

Goodnight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not many people seem to consider how badly run the London club has been leading up to this current situation. Their own fans and past players have actually alluded to this but yet generally on here it always seems to be someone else's fault. It would be great to have a successful London club attracting huge support but, in reality, have they done all they can as a club to try to achieve that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much help has the RFL given to the Bulls in recent years compared to London?

Would the RFL have bought the lease of Londons ground like it did Bradfords?

Would the RFL have advanced London money like they did the Bulls?

 

Goodnight.

Not as much.

London don't have a ground to bargain with, although if they had an area the size of Odsal (peace be upon it) in London then they would be quids in.

Yes, almost certainly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not many people seem to consider how badly run the London club has been leading up to this current situation. Their own fans and past players have actually alluded to this but yet generally on here it always seems to be someone else's fault. It would be great to have a successful London club attracting huge support but, in reality, have they done all they can as a club to try to achieve that?

I'd suggest that the most promising period in the history of the Broncos was when Richard Branson was their owner during the mid-late 90's. They were building a good fanbase, attracting decent crowds and were very competitive. Sadly, that progress all came crashing down when they moved to The Valley and lost all momentum. I guess that, back then, they were being run by people who knew what they were doing. If the right people were in charge down there, I'm sure that they could achieve long term success. As always, however, the million dollar question is ; 'how do we ensure that those people are put in place?'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest that the most promising period in the history of the Broncos was when Richard Branson was their owner during the mid-late 90's. They were building a good fanbase, attracting decent crowds and were very competitive. Sadly, that progress all came crashing down when they moved to The Valley and lost all momentum. I guess that, back then, they were being run by people who knew what they were doing. If the right people were in charge down there, I'm sure that they could achieve long term success. As always, however, the million dollar question is ; 'how do we ensure that those people are put in place?'.

As you say, it's the million dollar question. Perhaps it's a case of London being considered as a 'protected species' for so long by the RFL that has led to complacency and ultimately their possible demise. Hopefully not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest that the most promising period in the history of the Broncos was when Richard Branson was their owner during the mid-late 90's. They were building a good fanbase, attracting decent crowds and were very competitive. Sadly, that progress all came crashing down when they moved to The Valley and lost all momentum. I guess that, back then, they were being run by people who knew what they were doing. If the right people were in charge down there, I'm sure that they could achieve long term success. As always, however, the million dollar question is ; 'how do we ensure that those people are put in place?'.

Check your facts - it was the move to The Stoop that stopped progress AFTER leaving The Valley in 1996

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your facts - it was the move to The Stoop that stopped progress AFTER leaving The Valley in 1996

I'm well aware that they left The Valley at the end of the 1996 season, however in their first season at The Stoop they finished the league season in 2nd place - their best ever finish. They then moved back to The Valley in 1999, which seems to coincide with the start of their downturn in fortune. Either way, the Branson era does seem to indicate that - if well run by competent people, there's a chance of making the club a success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do; I just like to buck the trend and actually bring a bit of common sense and reality to the discussion!

Heretic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BBC report Leeds coach Brian McDermott as saying rugby league in London should be given a chance.

 

It has been 34 years since Fulham launched, how long does he want to give it FFS

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/25928537

 

So what do you want to do about Salford then? they've been given 119 years??.

 

How about Halifax - another 119 years to get where??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either way, the Branson era does seem to indicate that - if well run by competent people, there's a chance of making the club a success.

 

Indeed.

 

Anyway what do Larndan fans think of the move to Barnet in light of the new Superleague deal?

 

Did Hughes know this may well have been coming??

 

Should those who believe this season is the beginning of the end revise that to a "new start"?*

 

Wlll Broncos thrive on the new format, does it suit their position in the game??

 

( please no more prejudice, no more "how many new starts do they want", many northern clubs have had new starts for over a century, no more people in London don't like RL, really?They don't like it in Manchester either, but don't tell Marwan)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what do you want to do about Salford then? they've been given 119 years??.

 

How about Halifax - another 119 years to get where??

You are the one who constantly argues that London should be given special treatment. I don't recall anyone saying similar for Salford or Halifax. But that doesn't fit your agenda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are the one who constantly argues that London should be given special treatment. I don't recall anyone saying similar for Salford or Halifax. But that doesn't fit your agenda.

 

It's been said for Salford.  Normally by people who think they should take over the northwest and call themselves Manchester.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 10th April 2017

Rugby League World - April 2017