Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ramsfandan

Hookers

23 posts in this topic

where was ryan wright is he injured or not picked? hes miles better than hemingway at hooker in my opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

where was ryan wright is he injured or not picked? hes miles better than hemingway at hooker in my opinion

Wasn't picked again,looks like he's out of favour I don't know why because he's a good player,could he be the next rising star to leave???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leavei it to glen as we've been told on other threads he knows best but I agree with ramsfandan wrighty adds far more to the side than the predictable hemingway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't picked again,looks like he's out of favour I don't know why because he's a good player,could he be the next rising star to leave???

dont know graham mate i hope not but hemingways defence worries me u cant play hooker with a poor defence as his

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i will leave it to glen reg gasnier mate! get wrighty on now or am not going!!!!!!!!! jus jokin ther by the way lol  :tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont know graham mate i hope not but hemingways defence worries me u cant play hooker with a poor defence as his

 

 

Wright has been injured for a while - upper arm I believe. He also is a poor tackler though. Farrell deserves a run, at least from the bench based on Sunday's performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So do we drop Farrell to let Wright play?

Nah we drop Hemmingway and let both Farrell and Wright share the role. Hemmingway offers nothing in terms of passing or defence playing as a hooker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah we drop Hemmingway and let both Farrell and Wright share the role. Hemmingway offers nothing in terms of passing or defence playing as a hooker.

BSJ says Wright is a poor tackler. Maybe it's a matter of opinion. And let's not forget that Barrow are not the strongest opposition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BSJ says Wright is a poor tackler. Maybe it's a matter of opinion. And let's not forget that Barrow are not the strongest opposition.

This is true it is opinion and only one counts that's the coach so I'll support whoever he picks. Just don't like Hemmingway at hooker that's all it's not his position and he can't play the role. His distribution from dummy half is shocking and that's so important being it's the start of every play we have, the amount of bad passes and wrong decisions he has made in the last 3 weeks is unacceptable. We have two natural hookers in Faz and Wrighty both who have looked much better when they came on in my humble opinion but that's all it is mate just my opinion I'm far from an expert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wright has been injured for a while - upper arm I believe. He also is a poor tackler though. Farrell deserves a run, at least from the bench based on Sunday's performance.

wrighty not been injured all seaon had flu at xmas THATS IT.. ....last 2 games he played he turned games around ie swinton and whitehaven ... ....another rising star given no chances and about to exit if hemmingways an hooker i,m superman ....9 times out of 10 he always goes to the right to pass...and goes hiding on defensive dutys....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with ralfers and bov hemingways never seen a hooker and wright is alot better than hemingway in that position but as ive said before i will continue to support the team no matter who glen picks in his team as he is the coach not me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with ralfers and bov hemingways never seen a hooker and wright is alot better than hemingway in that position but as ive said before i will continue to support the team no matter who glen picks in his team as he is the coach not me

 

 

That's the kind of loyalty we need - so I'm told.

 

Hemingway does a lot more organising and has a decent kicking game. His distribution from the ptb is poor however and Wright's isn't a great deal better - balls to head or ankles tells the story. Watch Farrell's skills in this area and they are an improvement - godwin's are also very good, but it is easy to overlook someone doing things right rather tha someone doing them wrong.

 

The good thing at present is that we actually do have a number of options to choose from, hence this debate.The selection against halifax will be an indicator of GM's preference, and it will be Hemingway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the "which hookers should make the 17" thread.

 

looks like the "Forum Police" are trying to take control :lol: 

 

Where are the dissidents Coolie and BSJ, not being Waterboarded I hope :download:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like the "Forum Police" are trying to take control :lol:

 

Where are the dissidents Coolie and BSJ, not being Waterboarded I hope :download:

 

 

  :assassin:   :help:     :bye:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just given the discussion its own thread so it's easier for everyone to spot, rather than being buried in multiple pages in the Barrow match thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This we should start with Farrell at hooker, Hyde at 6, and Wright on the bench,possibly rest Hemmingway but this all depends on the extent of the injuries suffered in the Barrow match

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the kind of loyalty we need - so I'm told.

 

Hemingway does a lot more organising and has a decent kicking game. His distribution from the ptb is poor however and Wright's isn't a great deal better - balls to head or ankles tells the story. Watch Farrell's skills in this area and they are an improvement - godwin's are also very good, but it is easy to overlook someone doing things right rather tha someone doing them wrong.

 

The good thing at present is that we actually do have a number of options to choose from, hence this debate.The selection against halifax will be an indicator of GM's preference, and it will be Hemingway.

Amazing how we percieve things differently. I don't really see Farrell as a hooker - yes he has a decent pass, but it is slow, and he isn't busy enough in the position. He is however, a really strong and powerful lad, who should be groomed for second row IMO. He bounced Harrison out of the way on Sunday, and that takes some doing. Wright still the best option for me, with TH on the bench, and Farrell as forward cover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing how we percieve things differently. I don't really see Farrell as a hooker - yes he has a decent pass, but it is slow, and he isn't busy enough in the position. He is however, a really strong and powerful lad, who should be groomed for second row IMO. He bounced Harrison out of the way on Sunday, and that takes some doing. Wright still the best option for me, with TH on the bench, and Farrell as forward cover.

 

 

Full back it will be then!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to complain that the title of this thread is misleading

And has nothing to do with wives/girlfriends or girls of Batley

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originating from Dewsbury but falling for the charms of a Batley lass I left my old friends from Shawcross behind me. I bumped into one of said friends a few days ago and we chatted over old times. He told me a tale of how he was once caught in the act by his girlfriend's mother! OMG I said what did she say?

 

 

He said......

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baaaaa :onthequiet:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



League Express - Mon 24th July 2017

Rugby League World - August 2017