Posted 17 July 2010 - 10:38 PM
Without being sarcastic, TO are hardly a household name and as such unlikely to confuse the assorted chimernee sweeps and pickpockets that follow Skolars or Quins.
Me old bamboo
You can't throw me to the lions - I'm Charlton Heston!
Posted 18 July 2010 - 06:34 AM
They should follow Crusaders example and relocate to Chester or thereabouts.
A man is getting along on the road of wisdom when he realises that his opinion is just an opinion
Posted 18 July 2010 - 07:42 AM
Posted 18 July 2010 - 08:48 AM
Somtimes these things get out before any official link. I am sure there will be one along shortly
Anyway like I said it may only be a couple of games for a trial period and may never happen.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 08:52 AM
Posted 18 July 2010 - 10:28 AM
As a culture, it is about as far from Rugby League's as I can imagine, and I include Twickenham in that.
Rubbish. Its a flawless stadium. On a retail park (not industrial!) like most new stadii. And a short bus ride from the pubs of Bletchley and Fenny Stratford, which are traditional English town areas of MK. It would be the smartist move London RL ever made IF it happens. On the M1, 45 miles nearer the north and a proper local market to sell to.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 11:38 AM
if that did happen they could call themselves London Olympians Rugby League Club. a big plus for Rugby League IMHO which would make more people aware that Rugby League is played in London at the olympic stadium.
It's a nice idea (and I've thought that name would be great previously) but West Ham may move there and with the football season starting ever earlier I think they'd be too much overlap before you even consider rental costs etc. Plus a few of the GP RU clubs have already been sniffing around too.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 02:08 PM
If it happened, it might be the smartest move Bronquins ever made but you could hardly say the same for London RL. Milton Keynes is not only outside London, it isn't even in the South East.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 02:19 PM
Milton Keynes is in the South East it is only 50 miles from London.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 02:22 PM
Technically speaking it is, the South East has a strange border that includes the Thames Valley area.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 02:24 PM
Posted 18 July 2010 - 05:37 PM
if West Ham move in they wont share with a union club as the wont want the pitch carved up, which the union game will do. IF they have share, they would sooner share with a Rugby League club as Rugby League does even less damage to a pitch that Soccer, and a majority of the Rugby League games would be played in the Soccer off season.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 05:42 PM
If West Ham move in they want it keeping/developing into a 55/60000 seater stadium which would make it a waste of time for Quins anyway
Posted 18 July 2010 - 07:05 PM
who knows, perhaps a move to the Olympic stadium might be the catalyst that brings in a lot more supporters to watch Qunins RL, or what ever they will be known as then.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 07:10 PM
50,000 more fans???
Posted 18 July 2010 - 07:43 PM
not overnight, but from little acorns mighty oaks do grow. i think Quins RL as they are known today have possibly one more move to get it right in London. i dont think gates are going to get much better if at all at the Stoop. the options as i see it for them are a move to the olympic stadium after 2012, or a move to a west London soccer staduim. i did live in London for a while a few years back, and i must admit that when the London Bronco's as they were then started playing out of the valley i did think that Rugby League in London would take off, sadly i was wrong.
Posted 18 July 2010 - 08:42 PM
Typical Wakefield fan - taking pride in another club's downwards spiral even though it's on a par with their own.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users